These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22371536)
1. Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of ten years: results from an independent centre. Coulter G; Young DA; Dalziel RE; Shimmin AJ J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Mar; 94(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 22371536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A medium-term comparison of hybrid hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients. Baker RP; Pollard TC; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Feb; 93(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21282752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Results of Birmingham hip resurfacing at 12 to 15 years: a single-surgeon series. Daniel J; Pradhan C; Ziaee H; Pynsent PB; McMinn DJ Bone Joint J; 2014 Oct; 96-B(10):1298-306. PubMed ID: 25274912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical and radiographic results of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with a minimum ten-year follow-up. Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Gruen TA; Wisk LE J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Nov; 92(16):2663-71. PubMed ID: 21084576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The outcome of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing in patients aged < 50 years up to 14 years post-operatively. Matharu GS; McBryde CW; Pynsent WB; Pynsent PB; Treacy RB Bone Joint J; 2013 Sep; 95-B(9):1172-7. PubMed ID: 23997127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum follow-up of ten years. Treacy RB; McBryde CW; Shears E; Pynsent PB J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Jan; 93(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21196539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. Pollard TC; Baker RP; Eastaugh-Waring SJ; Bannister GC J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 May; 88(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 16645103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. Steffen RT; Pandit HP; Palan J; Beard DJ; Gundle R; McLardy-Smith P; Murray DW; Gill HS J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Apr; 90(4):436-41. PubMed ID: 18378915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Metal ion levels from well-functioning Birmingham Hip Resurfacings decline significantly at ten years. Van Der Straeten C; Van Quickenborne D; De Roest B; Calistri A; Victor J; De Smet K Bone Joint J; 2013 Oct; 95-B(10):1332-8. PubMed ID: 24078528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up. Heilpern GN; Shah NN; Fordyce MJ J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1137-42. PubMed ID: 18757951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Survivorship and clinical outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: a minimum ten years' follow-up. Azam MQ; McMahon S; Hawdon G; Sankineani SR Int Orthop; 2016 Jan; 40(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 25820838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ten-year clinical, radiological and metal ion analysis of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: from a single, non-designer surgeon. Holland JP; Langton DJ; Hashmi M J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Apr; 94(4):471-6. PubMed ID: 22434461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Five to Ten-Year Results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Implant in the U.S.: A Single Institution's Experience. Ford MC; Hellman MD; Kazarian GS; Clohisy JC; Nunley RM; Barrack RL J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Nov; 100(21):1879-1887. PubMed ID: 30399083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Birmingham hip resurfacing: the prevalence of failure. Carrothers AD; Gilbert RE; Jaiswal A; Richardson JB J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Oct; 92(10):1344-50. PubMed ID: 20884969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Birmingham hip resurfacing in patients who are seventy years of age or older. Carrothers AD; Gilbert RE; Richardson JB Hip Int; 2011; 21(2):217-24. PubMed ID: 21462151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Canadian Arthroplasty Society's experience with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. An analysis of 2773 hips. Canadian Arthroplasty Society Bone Joint J; 2013 Aug; 95-B(8):1045-51. PubMed ID: 23908418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of head size and sex on the outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing. McBryde CW; Theivendran K; Thomas AM; Treacy RB; Pynsent PB J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2010 Jan; 92(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 20048102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with 28-mm diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a randomised study with six to nine years' follow-up. Vendittoli PA; Rivière C; Roy AG; Barry J; Lusignan D; Lavigne M Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11):1464-73. PubMed ID: 24151264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The early outcome of Birmingham hip resurfacing: an independent Thai surgeon experiences. Larbpaiboonpong V; Turajane T; Pragtong P J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Dec; 92 Suppl 6():S134-40. PubMed ID: 20120675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical and Functional Outcomes of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing System. Pascual-Garrido C; Morris BL; Dayton MR Orthopedics; 2016; 39(2):e236-9. PubMed ID: 26840695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]