These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22371536)
21. Mid-Term Results and Predictors of Patient-Reported Outcomes of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing. Oak SR; Strnad GJ; O'Rourke C; Higuera CA; Spindler KP; Brooks PJ J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27480827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in young patients: outcomes and activity levels at minimum ten-year follow-up. Chana R; Facek M; Tilley S; Walter WK; Zicat B; Walter WL Bone Joint J; 2013 Dec; 95-B(12):1603-9. PubMed ID: 24293588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. High prevalence of pseudotumors in patients with a Birmingham Hip Resurfacing prosthesis: a prospective cohort study of one hundred and twenty-nine patients. Bisschop R; Boomsma MF; Van Raay JJ; Tiebosch AT; Maas M; Gerritsma CL J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Sep; 95(17):1554-60. PubMed ID: 24005195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Outcomes with cementless total hip resurfacing: 5 year follow-up. Radtke K; Ettinger M; Heidgen H; Floerkemeier T; Noll Y; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Windhagen H; von Lewinski G Technol Health Care; 2014 Jan; 22(2):263-72. PubMed ID: 24898864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 10 years: results from an independent centre. Moroni A; Miscione MT; Orsini R; Micera G; Mosca S; Sinapi F; De Girolamo L; Banfi G Hip Int; 2017 Mar; 27(2):134-139. PubMed ID: 28362050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A well-fixed femoral stem facing a failed acetabular component: to exchange or not? A 5- to 15-year follow-up study. de Thomasson E; Conso C; Mazel C Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Feb; 98(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 22245150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The concentric all-polyethylene Exeter acetabular component in primary total hip replacement. Veitch SW; Whitehouse SL; Howell JR; Hubble MJ; Gie GA; Timperley AJ J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Oct; 92(10):1351-5. PubMed ID: 20884970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An 18-year comparison of hybrid total hip replacement and Birmingham hip resurfacing in active young patients. Jonas SC; Whitehouse MR; Bick S; Bannister GC; Baker RP Hip Int; 2019 Nov; 29(6):630-637. PubMed ID: 30672350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Independent predictors of revision following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data. Jameson SS; Baker PN; Mason J; Porter ML; Deehan DJ; Reed MR J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Jun; 94(6):746-54. PubMed ID: 22628587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Minimum ten-year results of primary bipolar hip arthroplasty for degenerative arthritis of the hip. Pellegrini VD; Heiges BA; Bixler B; Lehman EB; Davis CM J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1817-25. PubMed ID: 16882907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review of the first 230 hips. Hing CB; Back DL; Bailey M; Young DA; Dalziel RE; Shimmin AJ J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Nov; 89(11):1431-8. PubMed ID: 17998177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Articular surface replacement of the hip: a prospective single-surgeon series. Jameson SS; Langton DJ; Nargol AV J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Jan; 92(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 20044675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Medium-term effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty with straight tapered rectangular femoral prosthesis]. Liu H; Gu W; Sun J Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 May; 27(5):594-8. PubMed ID: 23879099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Femoral revision with the Wagner tapered stem: a ten- to 15-year follow-up study. Regis D; Sandri A; Bonetti I; Braggion M; Bartolozzi P J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Oct; 93(10):1320-6. PubMed ID: 21969429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radiographic evaluation of the results of total hip arthroplasty with the cementless Zweymüller endoprosthesis. Pietrzak K; Piślewski Z; Strzyzewski W; Pucher A; Kaczmarek W Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2010; 12(4):310-9. PubMed ID: 20876924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients fifty years of age or younger: a minimum ten-year follow-up. Takenaga RK; Callaghan JJ; Bedard NA; Liu SS; Klaassen AL; Pedersen DR J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Dec; 94(23):2153-9. PubMed ID: 23224386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Function and survival after revision of hip resurfacing. Jaiswal A; Gilbert RE; Sunil Kumar KH; Carrothers AD; Kuiper JH; Richardson JB Hip Int; 2011; 21(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 21960447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The relationship of sporting activity and implant survivorship after hip resurfacing. Le Duff MJ; Amstutz HC J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 May; 94(10):911-8. PubMed ID: 22617919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The use of a cementless modular stem in the treatment of subtrochanteric femoral fractures in conjunction with ipsilateral coxarthrosis. Oztürkmen Y; Uzümcügil O; Sükür E; Karamehmetoğlu M; Caniklioğlu M Orthopedics; 2011 Jan; 34(1):13. PubMed ID: 21210621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Short and mid-term outcomes and functional results in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty at 5 years follow-up: the Spanish experience. Pérez-Moro OS; Fernández-Cuadros ME; Neira-Borrajo I; Aranda-Izquierdo E; Albaladejo-Florin MJ; Llopis-Miró R BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Apr; 20(1):172. PubMed ID: 30992064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]