These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22371840)

  • 1. X-ray microtomographic evaluation of the influence of two preparation types on marginal fit of CAD/CAM alumina copings: a pilot study.
    Krasanaki ME; Pelekanos S; Andreiotelli M; Koutayas SO; Eliades G
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 22371840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of different fabrication steps on the marginal adaptation of two types of glass-infiltrated ceramic crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology.
    Alghazzawi TF; Liu PR; Essig ME
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 22372838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
    Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Oliver-Parra R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of marginal fit between all-porcelain margin versus alumina-supported margin on Procera Alumina crowns.
    Limkangwalmongkol P; Kee E; Chiche GJ; Blatz MB
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 19178619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vertical marginal and internal adaptation of all-ceramic copings made by CAD/CAM technology.
    Al-Rabab'ah MA; Macfarlane TV; McCord JF
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Sep; 16(3):109-15. PubMed ID: 19051552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
    Akbar JH; Petrie CS; Walker MP; Williams K; Eick JD
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide crowns in preparations with two different finish lines.
    Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Brufau-de Barberà M; Gomes-Azevedo S
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 22372886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal and internal adaptation of milled cobalt-chromium copings.
    Kane LM; Chronaios D; Sierraalta M; George FM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Nov; 114(5):680-5. PubMed ID: 26182851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional fit of CAD/CAM-made zirconia copings.
    Moldovan O; Luthardt RG; Corcodel N; Rudolph H
    Dent Mater; 2011 Dec; 27(12):1273-8. PubMed ID: 21983002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal fit of 14-unit zirconia fixed dental prosthesis retainers.
    Beuer F; Neumeier P; Naumann M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Feb; 36(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 18976261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Full-ceramic CAD/CIM anterior crowns and copings.
    Bindl A; Windisch S; Mörmann WH
    Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Apr; 2(2):97-111. PubMed ID: 11351494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of preparation depth differences on the marginal fit of zirconia crown copings: an in vitro study.
    Azar MS; Lehmann KM; Dietrich H; Weibrich G; Schmidtmann I; Scheller H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(3):264-6. PubMed ID: 21519575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the marginal fit of different coping materials and designs produced by computer aided manufacturing systems.
    Karataşli O; Kursoğlu P; Capa N; Kazazoğlu E
    Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 21282881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of CAD/CAM scanning method and tooth-preparation design on the vertical misfit of zirconia crown copings.
    Castillo Oyagüe R; Sánchez-Jorge MI; Sánchez Turrión A
    Am J Dent; 2010 Dec; 23(6):341-6. PubMed ID: 21344834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of convergence angle and cement space on adaptation of zirconium dioxide ceramic copings.
    Iwai T; Komine F; Kobayashi K; Saito A; Matsumura H
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2008 Aug; 66(4):214-8. PubMed ID: 18607834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of marginal fit of Lava CAD/CAM crown-copings with two finish lines.
    Re D; Cerutti F; Augusti G; Cerutti A; Augusti D
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(3):426-35. PubMed ID: 25126621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
    Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology.
    Quante K; Ludwig K; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1311-5. PubMed ID: 18384869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Circumferential fit assessment of CAD/CAM single crowns--a pilot investigation on a new virtual analytical protocol.
    Matta RE; Schmitt J; Wichmann M; Holst S
    Quintessence Int; 2012 Oct; 43(9):801-9. PubMed ID: 23041996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical marginal and internal gaps of In-Ceram crowns fabricated using the GN-I system.
    Kokubo Y; Nagayama Y; Tsumita M; Ohkubo C; Fukushima S; Vult von Steyern P
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Oct; 32(10):753-8. PubMed ID: 16159354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.