These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22372269)

  • 1. The effects of lubrication on the static frictional resistance of orthodontic brackets.
    Al-Mansouri N; Palmer G; Moles DR; Jones SP
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 22372269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Static frictional resistances of polycrystalline ceramic brackets with metal slot inserts.
    Rajakulendran J; Jones S
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17203579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of dental arch convexity and type of archwire on frictional forces.
    Fourie Z; Ozcan M; Sandham A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):14.e1-7; discussion 14-5. PubMed ID: 19577138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Frictional forces between lingual brackets and archwires measured by a friction tester.
    Park JH; Lee YK; Lim BS; Kim CW
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):816-24. PubMed ID: 15673146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative in vitro study of frictional resistance between lingual brackets and stainless steel archwires.
    Ozturk Ortan Y; Yurdakuloglu Arslan T; Aydemir B
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 21239394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of frictional resistance after immersion of metal brackets and orthodontic wires in a fluoride-containing prophylactic agent.
    Kao CT; Ding SJ; Wang CK; He H; Chou MY; Huang TH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):568.e1-9. PubMed ID: 17110251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role of lubricants on friction between self-ligating brackets and archwires.
    Leal RC; Amaral FL; França FM; Basting RT; Turssi CP
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Nov; 84(6):1049-53. PubMed ID: 24665889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Frictional resistances of different bracket-wire combinations.
    Kapur Wadhwa R; Kwon HK; Close JM
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 May; 20(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15233584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An ex vivo laboratory study to determine the static frictional resistance of a variable ligation orthodontic bracket system.
    Haskova JE; Palmer G; Jones SP
    J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 35(2):112-8; discussion 110. PubMed ID: 18525074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of artificial saliva on the frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and archwires.
    Downing A; McCabe JF; Gordon PH
    Br J Orthod; 1995 Feb; 22(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 7786865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Static frictional resistance with the slide low-friction elastomeric ligature system.
    Jones SP; Ben Bihi S
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 20043548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of chlorhexidine-containing prophylactic agent on the surface characterization and frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwires: an in vitro study.
    Hosseinzadeh Nik T; Hooshmand T; Farazdaghi H; Mehrabi A; Razavi ES
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Nov; 14(1):48. PubMed ID: 24325758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems.
    Read-Ward GE; Jones SP; Davies EH
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 9459030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Static frictional force and surface roughness of various bracket and wire combinations.
    Doshi UH; Bhad-Patil WA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 21195280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resistance to sliding of titanium brackets tested against stainless steel and beta-titanium archwires with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states.
    Whitley JQ; Kusy RP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Mar; 131(3):400-11. PubMed ID: 17346598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the frictional coefficients for selected archwire-bracket slot combinations in the dry and wet states.
    Kusy RP; Whitley JQ; Prewitt MJ
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(4):293-302. PubMed ID: 1763840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The friction and wear patterns of orthodontic brackets and archwires in the dry state.
    Michelberger DJ; Eadie RL; Faulkner MG; Glover KE; Prasad NG; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Dec; 118(6):662-74. PubMed ID: 11113802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of Super Slick elastomeric modules in reducing friction during sliding: a comparative in vitro study.
    Pattan SK; Peddu R; Bandaru SK; Lanka D; Mallavarapu K; Pathan AB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Sep; 15(5):543-51. PubMed ID: 25707823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of stainless steel inserts on the resistance to sliding of esthetic brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states.
    Thorstenson G; Kusy R
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Apr; 73(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 12725373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vitro investigation on friction generated by ceramic brackets.
    Tecco S; Teté S; Festa M; Festa F
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e133-44. PubMed ID: 21490982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.