These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2237259)

  • 1. Reproducibility of hearing threshold measurements. Supplementary data on bone-conduction and speech audiometry.
    Laukli E; Fjermedal O
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 2237259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation and test-retest reliability of the IHR-McCormick Automated Toy Discrimination Test.
    Summerfield Q; Palmer AR; Foster JR; Marshall DH; Twomey T
    Br J Audiol; 1994 Jun; 28(3):165-79. PubMed ID: 7841901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical validation of the AMTAS automated audiometer.
    Eikelboom RH; Swanepoel de W; Motakef S; Upson GS
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 23548148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identification of conductive hearing loss using air conduction tests alone: reliability and validity of an automatic test battery.
    Convery E; Keidser G; Seeto M; Freeston K; Zhou D; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 24080948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
    Wong LL; Cheung C; Wong EC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic Hearing Assessment in Schools: Validity and Time Efficiency of Automated Audiometry.
    Mahomed-Asmail F; Swanepoel de W; Eikelboom RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 26809325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; van der Pouw CT; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting speech recognition thresholds from pure tone hearing thresholds.
    Coren S; Hakstian AR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1994 Oct; 79(2):1003-8. PubMed ID: 7870486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bone-conducted speech: intelligibility functions and threshold force levels for spondees.
    Beattie RC; Smiarowski RA
    Am J Otol; 1981 Oct; 3(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 7304720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity of diagnostic computer-based air and forehead bone conduction audiometry.
    Swanepoel de W; Biagio L
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Apr; 8(4):210-4. PubMed ID: 21391065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Audiological and subjective benefit results in bone-anchored hearing device users.
    Boleas-Aguirre MS; Bulnes Plano MD; de Erenchun Lasa IR; Ibáñez Beroiz B
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):494-503. PubMed ID: 22472615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical measurements of speech reception threshold in noise.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 6719016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram.
    Smoorenburg GF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):421-37. PubMed ID: 1737889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Amplification of transcutaneous and percutaneous bone-conduction devices with a test-band in an induced model of conductive hearing loss.
    Park MJ; Lee JR; Yang CJ; Yoo MH; Jin IS; Choi CH; Park HJ
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):653-7. PubMed ID: 27347717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binaural application of the bone-anchored hearing aid.
    Snik AF; Beynon AJ; Mylanus EA; van der Pouw CT; Cremers CW
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1998 Mar; 107(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 9525238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Masked high-frequency bone-conduction audiometry: test reliability.
    McDermott JC; Fausti SA; Henry JA; Frey RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1991 Apr; 2(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 1768879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Our auditory results using the Vibrant Soundbridge on the long process of the incus: 20 years of data.
    Grégoire A; Van Damme JP; Gilain C; Bihin B; Garin P
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Feb; 45(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 28285827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and evaluation of a tablet-based diagnostic audiometer.
    Thoidis I; Vrysis L; Markou K; Papanikolaou G
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Aug; 58(8):476-483. PubMed ID: 30987489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fixed-Level Frequency Threshold Testing for Ototoxicity Monitoring.
    Rieke CC; Clavier OH; Allen LV; Anderson AP; Brooks CA; Fellows AM; Brungart DS; Buckey JC
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):e369-e375. PubMed ID: 28362673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.