These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22372614)

  • 1. Direct to consumer genetic testing: a systematic review of position statements, policies and recommendations.
    Skirton H; Goldsmith L; Jackson L; O'Connor A
    Clin Genet; 2012 Sep; 82(3):210-8. PubMed ID: 22372614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a systematic review of european guidelines, recommendations, and position statements.
    Rafiq M; Ianuale C; Ricciardi W; Boccia S
    Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2015 Oct; 19(10):535-47. PubMed ID: 26313927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Informed choice in direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTCGT) websites: a content analysis of benefits, risks, and limitations.
    Singleton A; Erby LH; Foisie KV; Kaphingst KA
    J Genet Couns; 2012 Jun; 21(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 22194036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.
    Covolo L; Rubinelli S; Ceretti E; Gelatti U
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Dec; 17(12):e279. PubMed ID: 26677835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct-to-consumer genetic tests providing health risk information: A systematic review of consequences for consumers and health services.
    Nolan JJ; Ormondroyd E
    Clin Genet; 2023 Jul; 104(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 36994636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Helping Patients Make Informed Choices.
    Mahon SM
    Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2018 Feb; 22(1):33-36. PubMed ID: 29350705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct-to-consumer genomic testing: systematic review of the literature on user perspectives.
    Goldsmith L; Jackson L; O'Connor A; Skirton H
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2012 Aug; 20(8):811-6. PubMed ID: 22333900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Guidance for patients considering direct-to-consumer genetic testing and health professionals involved in their care: development of a practical decision tool.
    Jackson L; Goldsmith L; Skirton H
    Fam Pract; 2014 Jun; 31(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 24473677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: where and how does genetic counseling fit?
    Middleton A; Mendes Á; Benjamin CM; Howard HC
    Per Med; 2017 May; 14(3):249-257. PubMed ID: 29767582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consumer involvement in Quality Use of Medicines (QUM) projects - lessons from Australia.
    Kirkpatrick CM; Roughead EE; Monteith GR; Tett SE
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2005 Dec; 5():75. PubMed ID: 16318638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct-to-consumer genomic testing from the perspective of the health professional: a systematic review of the literature.
    Goldsmith L; Jackson L; O'Connor A; Skirton H
    J Community Genet; 2013 Apr; 4(2):169-80. PubMed ID: 23322235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Who are you going to call? Primary care patients' disclosure decisions regarding direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
    Wasson K; Cherny S; Sanders TN; Hogan NS; Helzlsouer KJ
    Narrat Inq Bioeth; 2014; 4(1):53-68. PubMed ID: 24748260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are health professionals ready for direct-to-consumer genetic and genomic testing?
    Skirton H; Jackson L; Goldsmith L; O'Connor A
    Per Med; 2013 Sep; 10(7):673-682. PubMed ID: 29768754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct to consumer genetic testing and the libertarian right to test.
    Bonython WE; Arnold BB
    J Med Ethics; 2018 Nov; 44(11):787-789. PubMed ID: 28824006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Understanding and perception of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Hong Kong.
    Hui VCC; Li HC; Chow JHK; Ng CSC; Lui CYW; Fung JLF; Mak CCY; Chung BHY; Lau KK
    J Genet Couns; 2021 Dec; 30(6):1640-1648. PubMed ID: 33938075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of direct-to-consumer genetic testing on Australian clinical genetics services.
    Millward M; Tiller J; Bogwitz M; Kincaid H; Taylor S; Trainer AH; Lacaze P
    Eur J Med Genet; 2020 Sep; 63(9):103968. PubMed ID: 32502649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consumer and carer perspectives in the development of a mental health research, treatment and teaching facility: A thematic analysis.
    Katsikitis M; Lane BR; Ozols I; Statham D
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2017 Sep; 24(7):534-544. PubMed ID: 28449291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Awareness, attitudes and perspectives of direct-to-consumer genetic testing in Greece: a survey of potential consumers.
    Mavroidopoulou V; Xera E; Mollaki V
    J Hum Genet; 2015 Sep; 60(9):515-23. PubMed ID: 26040209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrating values and consumer involvement in guidelines with the patient at the center: article 8 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.
    Kelson M; Akl EA; Bastian H; Cluzeau F; Curtis JR; Guyatt G; Montori VM; Oliver S; Schünemann HJ;
    Proc Am Thorac Soc; 2012 Dec; 9(5):262-8. PubMed ID: 23256169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Current landscape of direct-to-consumer genetic testing and its role in ophthalmology: a review.
    Sanfilippo PG; Kearns LS; Wright P; Mackey DA; Hewitt AW
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 43(6):578-90. PubMed ID: 25676199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.