These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22372614)

  • 21. Direct-to-consumer online genetic testing and the four principles: an analysis of the ethical issues.
    Wasson K; Cook ED; Helzlsouer K
    Ethics Med; 2006; 22(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 17115513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Joint SOGC-CCMG Opinion for Reproductive Genetic Carrier Screening: An Update for All Canadian Providers of Maternity and Reproductive Healthcare in the Era of Direct-to-Consumer Testing.
    Wilson RD; De Bie I; Armour CM; Brown RN; Campagnolo C; Carroll JC; Okun N; Nelson T; Zwingerman R; Audibert F; Brock JA; Brown RN; Campagnolo C; Carroll JC; De Bie I; Johnson JA; Okun N; Pastruck M; Vallée-Pouliot K; Wilson RD; Zwingerman R; Armour C; Chitayat D; De Bie I; Fernandez S; Kim R; Lavoie J; Leonard N; Nelson T; Taylor S; Van Allen M; Van Karnebeek C
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Aug; 38(8):742-762.e3. PubMed ID: 27638987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Nutrigenomics and ethics interface: direct-to-consumer services and commercial aspects.
    Ries NM; Castle D
    OMICS; 2008 Dec; 12(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 19040371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Committee Opinion No. 724 Summary: Consumer Testing for Disease Risk.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 130(5):1176-1177. PubMed ID: 29064967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Direct-to-Consumer Genomic Testing Through an Ethics Lens: Oncology Nursing Considerations.
    VerStrate CA; Mahon SM
    Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2023 Jul; 27(4):380-388. PubMed ID: 37677769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: good, bad or benign?
    Caulfield T; Ries NM; Ray PN; Shuman C; Wilson B
    Clin Genet; 2010 Feb; 77(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 19968666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Direct to consumer genetic and genomic testing with associated implications for advanced nursing practice.
    Aleman KM; Chipman M; Peck JL; Hughes AK; Murphey C
    J Am Assoc Nurse Pract; 2021 Jun; 34(2):381-388. PubMed ID: 34107502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Consumers' views of direct-to-consumer genetic information.
    McBride CM; Wade CH; Kaphingst KA
    Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet; 2010; 11():427-46. PubMed ID: 20690815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2397-406. PubMed ID: 12692171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Human Genetics Society of Australasia Position Statement: Online DNA Testing.
    Savard J; Terrill B; Dunlop K; Samanek A; Metcalfe SA;
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2020 Aug; 23(4):256-258. PubMed ID: 32838824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Transparency of genetic testing services for 'health, wellness and lifestyle': analysis of online prepurchase information for UK consumers.
    Hall JA; Gertz R; Amato J; Pagliari C
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2017 Aug; 25(8):908-917. PubMed ID: 28703222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Where there's a web, there's a way: commercial genetic testing and the Internet.
    Williams-Jones B
    Community Genet; 2003; 6(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 12748438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: to test or not to test, that is the question.
    Dandara C; Greenberg J; Lambie L; Lombard Z; Naicker T; Ramesar R; Ramsay M; Roberts L; Theron M; Venter P; Bardien-Kruger S
    S Afr Med J; 2013 Jul; 103(8):510-2. PubMed ID: 23885726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Committee Opinion No. 724: Consumer Testing for Disease Risk.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 130(5):e270-e273. PubMed ID: 29064973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Direct to consumer testing in reproductive contexts--should health professionals be concerned?
    Skirton H
    Life Sci Soc Policy; 2015; 11():4. PubMed ID: 26085310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Advantages and disadvantages of direct-to-consumer genetic tests].
    Christiansen CW; Gerdes AA
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2017 Mar; 179(11):. PubMed ID: 28330535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. "It's our DNA, we deserve the right to test!" A content analysis of a petition for the right to access direct-to-consumer genetic testing.
    Su Y; Borry P; Otte IC; Howard HC
    Per Med; 2013 Sep; 10(7):729-739. PubMed ID: 29768761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Telemedicine for the Medicare population: pediatric, obstetric, and clinician-indirect home interventions.
    Hersh WR; Wallace JA; Patterson PK; Shapiro SE; Kraemer DF; Eilers GM; Chan BK; Greenlick MR; Helfand M
    Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ); 2001 Aug; (24 Suppl):1-32. PubMed ID: 11569328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Behavioural changes, sharing behaviour and psychological responses after receiving direct-to-consumer genetic test results: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Stewart KFJ; Wesselius A; Schreurs MAC; Schols AMWJ; Zeegers MP
    J Community Genet; 2018 Jan; 9(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 28664264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Good laboratory practices for biochemical genetic testing and newborn screening for inherited metabolic disorders.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Recomm Rep; 2012 Apr; 61(RR-2):1-44. PubMed ID: 22475884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.