These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22372961)

  • 1. A new, simple implant-level impression technique for dental implants in limited interproximal space.
    Saboury A; Hadi A
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):328-30. PubMed ID: 22372961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Developing a fixture level cast for implants with interfering axial convergence.
    Ahuja SA; Wicks RA; Brandt RL
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2010; 90(2):28-9; quiz 30-1. PubMed ID: 20698434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The O-ring universal impression technique.
    Hussaini S
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Oct; 17(7):599-600. PubMed ID: 18761567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A simple method of making an implant-level impression when presented with limited space, unfavorable implant positions, or problematic implant angulations.
    Chaimattayompol N; Arbree NS; Wong SX
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):684-7. PubMed ID: 12131893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A technique for verifying implant analog positions in the definitive cast.
    Sadid-Zadeh R; O'Neal SJ; Liu PR; Aponte-Wesson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 23522369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants.
    Lee YJ; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Angled Abutment Transfer Jig: A Technical Report.
    Imam AY; Al-Dabbagh RA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 May; 21(5):593-596. PubMed ID: 32690846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Master cast accuracy in single-tooth implant replacement cases: an in vitro comparison. A technical note.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):455-60. PubMed ID: 15973958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis.
    Del'Acqua MA; Arioli-Filho JN; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 18548918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of impressions for internal-connection implant prostheses with various divergent angles.
    Jang HK; Kim S; Shim JS; Lee KW; Moon HS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1011-5. PubMed ID: 22010084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster.
    Wise M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The accuracy of an implant impression technique using digitally coded healing abutments.
    Eliasson A; Ortorp A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e30-8. PubMed ID: 21453396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A review of implant abutments--abutment classification to aid prosthetic selection.
    Karunagaran S; Paprocki GJ; Wicks R; Markose S
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2013; 93(2):18-23; quiz 23-4. PubMed ID: 24611217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional accuracy of implant and abutment level impression techniques: effect on marginal discrepancy.
    Alikhasi M; Siadat H; Monzavi A; Momen-Heravi F
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Dec; 37(6):649-57. PubMed ID: 20594060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study.
    Papaspyridakos P; Lal K; White GS; Weber HP; Gallucci GO
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 22167432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An alternative technique for the accurate transfer of periimplant soft tissue contour.
    Man Y; Qu Y; Dam HG; Gong P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 23395340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Making an implant-level impression using solid plastic, press-fit, closed-tray impression copings: a clinical report.
    Selecman AM; Wicks RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):158-9. PubMed ID: 19231566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of the implant impression in abutment selection: a technical note.
    Kupeyan HK; Lang BR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 7672844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Displacement of implant components from impressions to definitive casts.
    Kim S; Nicholls JI; Han CH; Lee KW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):747-55. PubMed ID: 17066636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.