These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22373851)
1. [Assessment of the sensitizing potency of cosmetic ingredients and commodities. How will the ingredients of cosmetics and commodities be tested in Europe today and tomorrow?]. Peiser M; Platzek T; Luch A Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2012 Mar; 55(3):373-9. PubMed ID: 22373851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cosmetics as causes of allergic contact dermatitis. Dooms-Goossens A Cutis; 1993 Nov; 52(5):316-20. PubMed ID: 8299396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contact allergy to the 26 specific fragrance ingredients to be declared on cosmetic products in accordance with the EU cosmetics directive. Heisterberg MV; Menné T; Johansen JD Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Nov; 65(5):266-75. PubMed ID: 21943251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Safety assessment of personal care products/cosmetics and their ingredients. Nohynek GJ; Antignac E; Re T; Toutain H Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2010 Mar; 243(2):239-59. PubMed ID: 20005888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Strategy to decrease the risk of adverse effects of fragrance ingredients in cosmetic products. Jansson T; Lodén M Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Sep; 12(3):166-9. PubMed ID: 11526523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Natural ingredients in cosmetic products-A suggestion for a screening series for skin allergy. Bruusgaard-Mouritsen MA; Johansen JD; Zachariae C; Kirkeby CS; Garvey LH Contact Dermatitis; 2020 Oct; 83(4):251-270. PubMed ID: 32248558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New aspects in allergic contact dermatitis. Mortz CG; Andersen KE Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol; 2008 Oct; 8(5):428-32. PubMed ID: 18769196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Allergy to cosmetics: a literature review. Alani JI; Davis MD; Yiannias JA Dermatitis; 2013; 24(6):283-90. PubMed ID: 24201464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assuring consumer safety without animal testing: a feasibility case study for skin sensitisation. Maxwell G; Aleksic M; Aptula A; Carmichael P; Fentem J; Gilmour N; Mackay C; Pease C; Pendlington R; Reynolds F; Scott D; Warner G; Westmoreland C Altern Lab Anim; 2008 Nov; 36(5):557-68. PubMed ID: 19025323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in European legislation make it timely to introduce a transparent market surveillance system for cosmetics. Lodén M; Ungerth L; Serup J Acta Derm Venereol; 2007; 87(6):485-92. PubMed ID: 17989885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The way forward for assessing the human health safety of cosmetics in the EU - Workshop proceedings. Rogiers V; Benfenati E; Bernauer U; Bodin L; Carmichael P; Chaudhry Q; Coenraads PJ; Cronin MTD; Dent M; Dusinska M; Ellison C; Ezendam J; Gaffet E; Galli CL; Goebel C; Granum B; Hollnagel HM; Kern PS; Kosemund-Meynen K; Ouédraogo G; Panteri E; Rousselle C; Stepnik M; Vanhaecke T; von Goetz N; Worth A Toxicology; 2020 Apr; 436():152421. PubMed ID: 32119890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of non-animal alternatives in the safety evaluations of cosmetics ingredients by the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS). Vinardell MP Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2015 Mar; 71(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 25555996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]