492 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22373922)
81. Comparison of digital PCR systems for the analysis of liquid biopsy samples of patients affected by lung and colorectal cancer.
Crucitta S; Ruglioni M; Novi C; Manganiello M; Arici R; Petrini I; Pardini E; Cucchiara F; Marmorino F; Cremolini C; Fogli S; Danesi R; Del Re M
Clin Chim Acta; 2023 Feb; 541():117239. PubMed ID: 36736684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
82. Digital PCR to assess hematopoietic chimerism after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
Stahl T; Böhme MU; Kröger N; Fehse B
Exp Hematol; 2015 Jun; 43(6):462-8.e1. PubMed ID: 25795523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
83. Histological tumor grade correlates with HER2/c-erB-2 status in invasive breast cancer: a comparative analysis between immunohistochemical (CB11 clone and Herceptest), FISH and differential PCR procedures.
López-Guerrero JA; Navarro S; Noguera R; Almenar S; Pellin A; Vázquez C; Llombart-Bosch A
Arkh Patol; 2003; 65(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 12669615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
84. Group B
Lin Y; Ye J; Luo M; Hu B; Wu D; Wen J; Yang C; Li Y; Ning Y
Anal Chem; 2019 Aug; 91(15):9466-9471. PubMed ID: 31269399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
85. Clinical utility of droplet digital PCR for human cytomegalovirus.
Sedlak RH; Cook L; Cheng A; Magaret A; Jerome KR
J Clin Microbiol; 2014 Aug; 52(8):2844-8. PubMed ID: 24871214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
86. Quantitative PCR analysis of c-erb B-2 (HER2/neu) gene amplification and comparison with p185(HER2/neu) protein expression in breast cancer drill biopsies.
de Cremoux P; Martin EC; Vincent-Salomon A; Dieras V; Barbaroux C; Liva S; Pouillart P; Sastre-Garau X; Magdelenat H
Int J Cancer; 1999 Oct; 83(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 10471520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
87. Virtual-Partition Digital PCR for High-Precision Chromosomal Counting Applications.
Jacky L; Yurk D; Alvarado J; Leatham B; Schwartz J; Annaloro J; MacDonald C; Rajagopal A
Anal Chem; 2021 Dec; 93(51):17020-17029. PubMed ID: 34905685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
88. Direct elicitation of template concentration from quantification cycle (Cq) distributions in digital PCR.
Mojtahedi M; Fouquier d'Hérouël A; Huang S
Nucleic Acids Res; 2014; 42(16):e126. PubMed ID: 25104023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
89. [Development of molecular analysis by digital PCR for clinical practice: positioning, current applications and perspectives].
Denis JA; Perrier A; Nectoux J; Lamy PJ; Alary AS; Sarafan-Vasseur N; Henaff D; Busser B; Appay R; Pedini P; Romanet P; Taly V; Fina F
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2019 Dec; 77(6):619-637. PubMed ID: 31859639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
90. Chip-based digital PCR as a direct quantification method for residual DNA in mRNA drugs.
Fan W; Zhao L; Yu L; Zhou Y
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2024 Jan; 238():115837. PubMed ID: 37952451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
91. High-throughput microfluidic single-cell digital polymerase chain reaction.
White AK; Heyries KA; Doolin C; Vaninsberghe M; Hansen CL
Anal Chem; 2013 Aug; 85(15):7182-90. PubMed ID: 23819473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
92. Digital PCR on an integrated self-priming compartmentalization chip.
Zhu Q; Qiu L; Yu B; Xu Y; Gao Y; Pan T; Tian Q; Song Q; Jin W; Jin Q; Mu Y
Lab Chip; 2014 Mar; 14(6):1176-85. PubMed ID: 24481046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
93. dPCR Mutational Analyses in Cell-Free DNA: A Comparison with Tissues.
Takeshita T; Iwase H
Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1909():105-118. PubMed ID: 30580426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
94. Influence of microfabrication on digital PCR performance in bead-based microwell array assays.
McCarthy Riley BF; Ward CL; Linz TH
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2020 Oct; 412(25):6917-6926. PubMed ID: 32772126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
95. Next-generation sequencing for tumor mutation quantification using liquid biopsies.
Provencio M; Pérez-Barrios C; Barquin M; Calvo V; Franco F; Sánchez E; Sánchez R; Marsden D; Cristóbal Sánchez J; Martin Acosta P; Laza-Briviesca R; Cruz-Bermúdez A; Romero A
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2020 Jan; 58(2):306-313. PubMed ID: 31469650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
96. Basic Concepts and Validation of Digital PCR Measurements.
Pinheiro L; Emslie KR
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1768():11-24. PubMed ID: 29717435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
97. Amplifications of oncogene erbB-2 and chromosome 20q in breast cancer determined by differentially competitive polymerase chain reaction.
Deng G; Yu M; Chen LC; Moore D; Kurisu W; Kallioniemi A; Waldman FM; Collins C; Smith HS
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1996; 40(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 8883970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
98. Impact of variance components on reliability of absolute quantification using digital PCR.
Jacobs BK; Goetghebeur E; Clement L
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Aug; 15(1):283. PubMed ID: 25147026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
99. Application of digital PCR with chip-in-a-tube format to analyze Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) somatic mosaicism.
Kahyo T; Iwaizumi M; Yamada H; Tao H; Kurachi K; Sugimura H
Clin Chim Acta; 2017 Dec; 475():91-96. PubMed ID: 29055690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
100. Validation of the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique for the determination of HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer.
Farshid G; Cheetham G; Davies R; Moore S; Rudzki Z
Diagn Mol Pathol; 2011 Mar; 20(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 21326034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
