494 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22373922)
101. Application of digital PCR with chip-in-a-tube format to analyze Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) somatic mosaicism.
Kahyo T; Iwaizumi M; Yamada H; Tao H; Kurachi K; Sugimura H
Clin Chim Acta; 2017 Dec; 475():91-96. PubMed ID: 29055690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
102. Validation of the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique for the determination of HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer.
Farshid G; Cheetham G; Davies R; Moore S; Rudzki Z
Diagn Mol Pathol; 2011 Mar; 20(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 21326034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
103. Measuring fetal brain and lung transcripts in amniotic fluid supernatant: a comparison of digital PCR and RT-qPCR methods.
Hui L; Beard S; Hannan NJ
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Dec; 31(23):3191-3196. PubMed ID: 28805106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
104. Modified direct-double-differential PCR for gene dosage quantification of HER2.
Zaczek A; Welnicka-Jaskiewicz M; Buerger H; Brandt BH; Bielawski KP
Oncol Rep; 2005 May; 13(5):971-5. PubMed ID: 15809766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
105. Requirement of cyclin-dependent kinase function for hepatitis B virus cccDNA synthesis as measured by digital PCR.
Bao CY; Hung HC; Chen YW; Fan CY; Huang CJ; Huang W
Ann Hepatol; 2020; 19(3):280-286. PubMed ID: 31964596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
106. [Digital PCR as a Highly Sensitive Diagnostic Tool: A Review].
Kopylova KV; Kasparov EW; Marchenko IV; Smolnikova MV
Mol Biol (Mosk); 2023; 57(5):771-781. PubMed ID: 37752642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
107. Benchmarking digital PCR partition classification methods with empirical and simulated duplex data.
Chen Y; De Spiegelaere W; Trypsteen W; Gleerup D; Vandesompele J; Lievens A; Vynck M; Thas O
Brief Bioinform; 2024 Mar; 25(3):. PubMed ID: 38555473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
108. Digital PCR for Single-Cell Analysis.
Fang W; Liu X; Maiga M; Cao W; Mu Y; Yan Q; Zhu Q
Biosensors (Basel); 2024 Jan; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 38391982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
109. Accurate quantification of DNA using on-site PCR (osPCR) by characterizing DNA amplification at single-molecule resolution.
Ding R; Liu L; Zhang J; Lv P; Zhou L; Zhang T; Li S; Zhao R; Yang Z; Xiong P; Chen H; Wang W; Wang H; Tian Z; Liu B; Chen C
Nucleic Acids Res; 2023 Jun; 51(11):e65. PubMed ID: 37194709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
110. Correspondence on "The Environmental Microbiology Minimum Information (EMMI) Guidelines: qPCR and dPCR Quality and Reporting for Environmental Microbiology".
Crank K; Papp K; Barber C; Wang P; Bivins A; Gerrity D
Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Dec; 57(48):20448-20449. PubMed ID: 37948750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
111. Rebuttal to Correspondence on "The Environmental Microbiology Minimum Information (EMMI) Guidelines: qPCR and dPCR Quality and Reporting for Environmental Microbiology".
Borchardt MA; Boehm AB; Salit M; Spencer SK; Wigginton KR; Noble RT
Environ Sci Technol; 2023 Dec; 57(48):20450-20451. PubMed ID: 37932026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
112. Considerations for digital PCR as an accurate molecular diagnostic tool.
Huggett JF; Cowen S; Foy CA
Clin Chem; 2015 Jan; 61(1):79-88. PubMed ID: 25338683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
113. The digital MIQE guidelines: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Digital PCR Experiments.
Huggett JF; Foy CA; Benes V; Emslie K; Garson JA; Haynes R; Hellemans J; Kubista M; Mueller RD; Nolan T; Pfaffl MW; Shipley GL; Vandesompele J; Wittwer CT; Bustin SA
Clin Chem; 2013 Jun; 59(6):892-902. PubMed ID: 23570709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
114. Absolute quantification by droplet digital PCR versus analog real-time PCR.
Hindson CM; Chevillet JR; Briggs HA; Gallichotte EN; Ruf IK; Hindson BJ; Vessella RL; Tewari M
Nat Methods; 2013 Oct; 10(10):1003-5. PubMed ID: 23995387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
115. Noninvasive detection of HER2 amplification with plasma DNA digital PCR.
Gevensleben H; Garcia-Murillas I; Graeser MK; Schiavon G; Osin P; Parton M; Smith IE; Ashworth A; Turner NC
Clin Cancer Res; 2013 Jun; 19(12):3276-84. PubMed ID: 23637122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
116. Methods for applying accurate digital PCR analysis on low copy DNA samples.
Whale AS; Cowen S; Foy CA; Huggett JF
PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e58177. PubMed ID: 23472156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
117. Digital PCR analysis of circulating nucleic acids.
Hudecova I
Clin Biochem; 2015 Oct; 48(15):948-56. PubMed ID: 25828047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
118. Droplet Digital™ PCR quantitation of HER2 expression in FFPE breast cancer samples.
Heredia NJ; Belgrader P; Wang S; Koehler R; Regan J; Cosman AM; Saxonov S; Hindson B; Tanner SC; Brown AS; Karlin-Neumann G
Methods; 2013 Jan; 59(1):S20-3. PubMed ID: 23036330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
119. DNA copy number concentration measured by digital and droplet digital quantitative PCR using certified reference materials.
Corbisier P; Pinheiro L; Mazoua S; Kortekaas AM; Chung PY; Gerganova T; Roebben G; Emons H; Emslie K
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2015 Mar; 407(7):1831-40. PubMed ID: 25600685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
120. Comparison of four digital PCR platforms for accurate quantification of DNA copy number of a certified plasmid DNA reference material.
Dong L; Meng Y; Sui Z; Wang J; Wu L; Fu B
Sci Rep; 2015 Aug; 5():13174. PubMed ID: 26302947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
