These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22374174)
1. Tracking motor improvement at the subtask level during robot-aided neurorehabilitation of stroke patients. Panarese A; Colombo R; Sterpi I; Pisano F; Micera S Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2012 Sep; 26(7):822-33. PubMed ID: 22374174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Taking a lesson from patients' recovery strategies to optimize training during robot-aided rehabilitation. Colombo R; Sterpi I; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Pisano F IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2012 May; 20(3):276-85. PubMed ID: 22623406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intensive sensorimotor arm training mediated by therapist or robot improves hemiparesis in patients with chronic stroke. Volpe BT; Lynch D; Rykman-Berland A; Ferraro M; Galgano M; Hogan N; Krebs HI Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2008; 22(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 18184932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional, task-specific robot therapy of the arm after stroke: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised trial. Klamroth-Marganska V; Blanco J; Campen K; Curt A; Dietz V; Ettlin T; Felder M; Fellinghauer B; Guidali M; Kollmar A; Luft A; Nef T; Schuster-Amft C; Stahel W; Riener R Lancet Neurol; 2014 Feb; 13(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 24382580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of two techniques of robot-aided upper limb exercise training after stroke. Stein J; Krebs HI; Frontera WR; Fasoli SE; Hughes R; Hogan N Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2004 Sep; 83(9):720-8. PubMed ID: 15314537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing mechanisms of recovery during robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper limb. Colombo R; Pisano F; Micera S; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Carrozza MC; Dario P; Minuco G Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2008; 22(1):50-63. PubMed ID: 17626223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of robot-assisted training on upper limb functional recovery during the rehabilitation of poststroke patients. Daunoraviciene K; Adomaviciene A; Grigonyte A; Griškevičius J; Juocevicius A Technol Health Care; 2018; 26(S2):533-542. PubMed ID: 29843276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients. Colombo R; Pisano F; Micera S; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Carrozza MC; Dario P; Minuco G IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Sep; 13(3):311-24. PubMed ID: 16200755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment-driven selection and adaptation of exercise difficulty in robot-assisted therapy: a pilot study with a hand rehabilitation robot. Metzger JC; Lambercy O; Califfi A; Dinacci D; Petrillo C; Rossi P; Conti FM; Gassert R J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Nov; 11():154. PubMed ID: 25399249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for upper-limb therapy and assessment in chronic stroke. Zollo L; Gallotta E; Guglielmelli E; Sterzi S Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2011 Jun; 47(2):223-36. PubMed ID: 21445028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke. Masiero S; Celia A; Rosati G; Armani M Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 17270510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Kwakkel G; Kollen BJ; Krebs HI Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2008; 22(2):111-21. PubMed ID: 17876068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation in sub-acute and chronic stroke: does spontaneous recovery have a limited impact on outcome? Colombo R; Sterpi I; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Pisano F NeuroRehabilitation; 2013; 33(4):621-9. PubMed ID: 24029005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of robot-aided bilateral force-induced isokinetic arm training combined with conventional rehabilitation on arm motor function in patients with chronic stroke. Chang JJ; Tung WL; Wu WL; Huang MH; Su FC Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Oct; 88(10):1332-8. PubMed ID: 17908578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Results of clinicians using a therapeutic robotic system in an inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit. Abdullah HA; Tarry C; Lambert C; Barreca S; Allen BO J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2011 Aug; 8():50. PubMed ID: 21871095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mechanisms of motor recovery in chronic and subacute stroke patients following a robot-aided training. Mazzoleni S; Puzzolante L; Zollo L; Dario P; Posteraro F IEEE Trans Haptics; 2014; 7(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 24968381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acceptability of robotic technology in neuro-rehabilitation: preliminary results on chronic stroke patients. Mazzoleni S; Turchetti G; Palla I; Posteraro F; Dario P Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Sep; 116(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 24461799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of electromyography-driven robot-aided hand training with neuromuscular electrical stimulation on hand control performance after chronic stroke. Rong W; Tong KY; Hu XL; Ho SK Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2015 Mar; 10(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 24377757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of a robotic device for the rehabilitation of severe upper limb paresis in subacute stroke: exploration of patient/robot interactions and the motor recovery process. Duret C; Courtial O; Grosmaire AG; Hutin E Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():482389. PubMed ID: 25821804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A pilot study of activity-based therapy in the arm motor recovery post stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Rabadi M; Galgano M; Lynch D; Akerman M; Lesser M; Volpe B Clin Rehabil; 2008 Dec; 22(12):1071-82. PubMed ID: 19052246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]