These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22374341)

  • 1. Sample size determination for disease prevalence studies with partially validated data.
    Qiu SF; Poon WY; Tang ML
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Feb; 25(1):37-63. PubMed ID: 22374341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of disease prevalence in two populations in the presence of misclassification.
    Tang ML; Qiu SF; Poon WY
    Biom J; 2012 Nov; 54(6):786-807. PubMed ID: 22941869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Test procedures for disease prevalence with partially validated data.
    Tang ML; Qiu SF; Poon WY; Tang NS
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(2):368-86. PubMed ID: 22251180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Homogeneity test of difference between two correlated proportions in stratified matched-pair studies.
    Tang NS; Zhang B; Li HQ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(6):1261-80. PubMed ID: 24138431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Test procedure and sample size determination for a proportion study using a double-sampling scheme with two fallible classifiers.
    Qiu SF; Zeng XS; Tang ML; Poon WY
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Apr; 28(4):1019-1043. PubMed ID: 29233082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Homogeneity testing for binomial proportions under stratified double-sampling scheme with two fallible classifiers.
    Qiu SF; Fu QX
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Dec; 29(12):3547-3568. PubMed ID: 32640937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of ordinal categorical data with misclassification.
    Poon WY; Wang HB
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Feb; 63(Pt 1):17-42. PubMed ID: 19364445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical inference of risk difference in K correlated 2 x 2 tables with structural zero.
    Wang SF; Tang NS; Zhang B; Wang XR
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(4):317-32. PubMed ID: 19152229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of disease prevalence in two populations under double-sampling scheme with two fallible classifiers.
    Qiu SF; He J; Tao JR; Tang ML; Poon WY
    J Appl Stat; 2020; 47(8):1375-1401. PubMed ID: 35706696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Homogeneity test of rate ratios in stratified matched-pair studies.
    Li HQ; Tang NS
    Biom J; 2011 Jul; 53(4):614-27. PubMed ID: 21608010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interval estimation for a proportion using a double-sampling scheme with two fallible classifiers.
    Qiu SF; Lian H; Zou GY; Zeng XS
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Aug; 27(8):2478-2503. PubMed ID: 27932666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confidence intervals for proportion difference from two independent partially validated series.
    Qiu SF; Poon WY; Tang ML
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):2250-2273. PubMed ID: 24448443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confidence intervals around Bayes Cost in multi-state diagnostic settings to estimate optimal performance.
    Batterton KA; Schubert CM
    Stat Med; 2014 Aug; 33(19):3280-99. PubMed ID: 24763997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hypothesis testing for two-stage designs with over or under enrollment.
    Zeng D; Gao F; Hu K; Jia C; Ibrahim JG
    Stat Med; 2015 Jul; 34(16):2417-26. PubMed ID: 25809924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calculation of confidence intervals for a finite population size.
    Julious SA
    Pharm Stat; 2019 Jan; 18(1):115-122. PubMed ID: 30411472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Asymptotic confidence interval construction for proportion difference in medical studies with bilateral data.
    Tang NS; Qiu SF; Tang ML; Pei YB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2011 Jun; 20(3):233-59. PubMed ID: 20181778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for proportion difference in the presence of incomplete data.
    Tang ML; Ling MH; Tian GL
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 19035467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determining sample size for a binary diagnostic test in the presence of verification bias.
    Shan G; Zhang H; Jiang T
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(6):1193-1202. PubMed ID: 29553878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample size for testing difference between two proportions for the bilateral-sample design.
    Qiu SF; Tang NS; Tang ML; Pei YB
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):857-71. PubMed ID: 20183448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An evaluation of inferential procedures for adaptive clinical trial designs with pre-specified rules for modifying the sample size.
    Levin GP; Emerson SC; Emerson SS
    Biometrics; 2014 Sep; 70(3):556-67. PubMed ID: 24766094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.