171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22374890)
1. Robotic nerve-sparing radical parametrectomy: feasibility and technique.
Magrina JF; Magtibay PM
Int J Med Robot; 2012 Jun; 8(2):206-9. PubMed ID: 22374890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nerve sparing technique in robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy: results.
Gil-Ibáñez B; Díaz-Feijoo B; Pérez-Benavente A; Puig-Puig O; Franco-Camps S; Centeno C; Xercavins J; Gil-Moreno A
Int J Med Robot; 2013 Sep; 9(3):339-44. PubMed ID: 23280808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Laparoscopic anatomical nerve sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a clinical analysis of 37 cases].
Chen Y; Li Y; Xu HC; Li JN; Li YY; Liang ZQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 May; 44(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 19573312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic radical parametrectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with invasive cervical cancer.
Ramirez PT; Schmeler KM; Wolf JK; Brown J; Soliman PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Oct; 111(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 18639329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Feasibility of unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer and evaluation of the post-surgery recovery of the bladder and rectal function].
Zhu T; Yu AJ; Shou HF; Chen X; Zhu JQ; Yang ZY; Zhang P; Gao YL
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 33(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 21575466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic radical parametrectomy in cervical cancer.
Zapardiel I; Zanagnolo V; Magrina JF; Magtibay PM
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2011; 72(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 21860209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now?
Sert B; Abeler V
Int J Med Robot; 2007 Sep; 3(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 17924449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Recent advances in the surgical management of cervical cancer.
Zakashansky K; Bradley WH; Chuang L; Rahaman J; Dottino P
Mt Sinai J Med; 2009 Dec; 76(6):567-76. PubMed ID: 20014423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [A prospective study on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer].
Li B; Zhang R; Wu LY; Zhang GY; Li X; Yu GZ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 43(8):606-10. PubMed ID: 19087497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safety and feasibility of robotic radical trachelectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Ramirez PT; Schmeler KM; Malpica A; Soliman PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Mar; 116(3):512-5. PubMed ID: 19944451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical parametrectomy for occult early-stage invasive cervical cancer after simple hysterectomy.
Li J; Xu H; Chen Y; Wang D; Li Y; Liang Z
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Oct; 22(8):1383-8. PubMed ID: 22964523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nerve plane-sparing radical hysterectomy: a simplified technique of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer.
Li B; Li W; Sun YC; Zhang R; Zhang GY; Yu GZ; Wu LY
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Jun; 124(12):1807-12. PubMed ID: 21740837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic radical hysterectomy: Technical aspects.
Magrina JF; Kho R; Magtibay PM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 19176237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A simplified technique for nerve-sparing type III radical hysterectomy: by reorganizing their surgical sequence, surgeons could more easily identify key nerves.
Charoenkwan K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Dec; 203(6):600.e1-6. PubMed ID: 21111111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic radical parametrectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy: our experience and review of the literature.
Vitobello D; Siesto G; Bulletti C; Accardi A; Iedà N
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 38(6):548-54. PubMed ID: 22425283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after robotic-assisted hysterectomy alone or with other procedures for benign and malignant indications.
Lee SJ; Calderon B; Gardner GJ; Mays A; Nolan S; Sonoda Y; Barakat RR; Leitao MM
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jun; 133(3):552-5. PubMed ID: 24736022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: feasibility and technique.
Magrina JF; Pawlina W; Kho RM; Magtibay PM
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Jun; 121(3):605-9. PubMed ID: 21419478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology.
Bandera CA; Magrina JF
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 21(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 19125000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and radical hysterectomy: a retrospective study].
Ju XZ; Li ZT; Yang HJ; Wu XH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 44(8):605-9. PubMed ID: 20003790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
