These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22375091)
21. A method for calling gains and losses in array CGH data. Wang P; Kim Y; Pollack J; Narasimhan B; Tibshirani R Biostatistics; 2005 Jan; 6(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 15618527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Detecting copy number variations from array CGH data based on a conditional random field model. Yin XL; Li J J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2010 Apr; 8(2):295-314. PubMed ID: 20401947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. DNA in situ hybridization (interphase cytogenetics) versus comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in human cancer: detection of numerical and structural chromosome aberrations. Van Dekken H; Krijtenburg PJ; Alers JC Acta Histochem; 2000 Feb; 102(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 10726167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Normalization of array-CGH data: influence of copy number imbalances. Staaf J; Jönsson G; Ringnér M; Vallon-Christersson J BMC Genomics; 2007 Oct; 8():382. PubMed ID: 17953745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Parsimonious higher-order hidden Markov models for improved array-CGH analysis with applications to Arabidopsis thaliana. Seifert M; Gohr A; Strickert M; Grosse I PLoS Comput Biol; 2012 Jan; 8(1):e1002286. PubMed ID: 22253580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bayesian Random Segmentation Models to Identify Shared Copy Number Aberrations for Array CGH Data. Baladandayuthapani V; Ji Y; Talluri R; Nieto-Barajas LE; Morris JS J Am Stat Assoc; 2010 Dec; 105(492):1358-1375. PubMed ID: 21512611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The potential of copy number gains and losses, detected by array-based comparative genomic hybridization, for computational differential diagnosis of B-cell lymphomas and genetic regions involved in lymphomagenesis. Takeuchi I; Tagawa H; Tsujikawa A; Nakagawa M; Katayama-Suguro M; Guo Y; Seto M Haematologica; 2009 Jan; 94(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 19029149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Genetic aberrations in prostate carcinoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization and microsatellite analysis: association with progression and angiogenesis. Strohmeyer DM; Berger AP; Moore DH; Bartsch G; Klocker H; Carroll PR; Loening SA; Jensen RH Prostate; 2004 Apr; 59(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 14991865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Development of a DNA-labeling system for array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Lieu PT; Jozsi P; Gilles P; Peterson T J Biomol Tech; 2005 Jun; 16(2):104-11. PubMed ID: 16030317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Detection of oncogene amplifications in medulloblastomas by comparative genomic hybridization and array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Tong CY; Hui AB; Yin XL; Pang JC; Zhu XL; Poon WS; Ng HK J Neurosurg; 2004 Feb; 100(2 Suppl Pediatrics):187-93. PubMed ID: 14758948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Pinkel D; Segraves R; Sudar D; Clark S; Poole I; Kowbel D; Collins C; Kuo WL; Chen C; Zhai Y; Dairkee SH; Ljung BM; Gray JW; Albertson DG Nat Genet; 1998 Oct; 20(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 9771718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. PAIR: paired allelic log-intensity-ratio-based normalization method for SNP-CGH arrays. Yang S; Pounds S; Zhang K; Fang Z Bioinformatics; 2013 Feb; 29(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 23196989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical array-based karyotyping of breast cancer with equivocal HER2 status resolves gene copy number and reveals chromosome 17 complexity. Gunn S; Yeh IT; Lytvak I; Tirtorahardjo B; Dzidic N; Zadeh S; Kim J; McCaskill C; Lim L; Gorre M; Mohammed M BMC Cancer; 2010 Jul; 10():396. PubMed ID: 20667129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Genomic profiling: from molecular cytogenetics to DNA arrays]. Theillet C; Orsetti B; Redon R; Manoir SD Bull Cancer; 2001 Mar; 88(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 11313203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Supervised classification of array CGH data with HMM-based feature selection. Daemen A; Gevaert O; Leunen K; Legius E; Vergote I; De Moor B Pac Symp Biocomput; 2009; ():468-79. PubMed ID: 19209723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction amplification and labeling methods on the sensitivity and specificity of metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Tsubosa Y; Sugihara H; Mukaisho K; Kamitani S; Peng DF; Ling ZQ; Tani T; Hattori T Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Apr; 158(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 15796963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparative genomic hybridization, allelic imbalance, and fluorescence in situ hybridization on chromosome 8 in prostate cancer. Cher ML; MacGrogan D; Bookstein R; Brown JA; Jenkins RB; Jensen RH Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1994 Nov; 11(3):153-62. PubMed ID: 7530484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A statistical approach for array CGH data analysis. Picard F; Robin S; Lavielle M; Vaisse C; Daudin JJ BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():27. PubMed ID: 15705208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. High frequency of common DNA copy number abnormalities detected by bacterial artificial chromosome array comparative genomic hybridization in 24 breast cancer cell lines. Saito S; Morita K; Hirano T Hum Cell; 2009 Feb; 22(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 19222606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Fast Bayesian Inference of Copy Number Variants using Hidden Markov Models with Wavelet Compression. Wiedenhoeft J; Brugel E; Schliep A PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 May; 12(5):e1004871. PubMed ID: 27177143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]