These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22375115)

  • 1. Inhibition of return is no hallmark of exogenous capture by unconscious cues.
    Fuchs I; Ansorge U
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():30. PubMed ID: 22375115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of relevant and irrelevant color singletons on inhibition of return and attentional capture.
    Ansorge U; Priess HW; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1687-702. PubMed ID: 24027028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Orienting of attention with and without cue awareness.
    Herreros L; Lambert AJ; Chica AB
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 May; 99():165-171. PubMed ID: 28284987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. S-ketamine influences strategic allocation of attention but not exogenous capture of attention.
    Fuchs I; Ansorge U; Huber-Huber C; Höflich A; Lanzenberger R
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Sep; 35():282-94. PubMed ID: 25676122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visible propagation from invisible exogenous cueing.
    Lin Z; Murray SO
    J Vis; 2013 Sep; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 24055791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visually Induced Inhibition of Return Affects the Integration of Auditory and Visual Information.
    Van der Stoep N; Van der Stigchel S; Nijboer TCW; Spence C
    Perception; 2017 Jan; 46(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 27484341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exogenous attentional capture by subliminal abrupt-onset cues: evidence from contrast-polarity independent cueing effects.
    Fuchs I; Theeuwes J; Ansorge U
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):974-88. PubMed ID: 23106374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrophysiological explorations of the cause and effect of inhibition of return in a cue-target paradigm.
    Tian Y; Klein RM; Satel J; Xu P; Yao D
    Brain Topogr; 2011 Jun; 24(2):164-82. PubMed ID: 21365310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neurophysiological Activations of Predictive and Non-predictive Exogenous Cues: A Cue-Elicited EEG Study on the Generation of Inhibition of Return.
    Vivas AB; Paraskevopoulos E; Castillo A; Fuentes LJ
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():227. PubMed ID: 30800091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence for an attentional component in saccadic inhibition of return.
    Souto D; Kerzel D
    Exp Brain Res; 2009 Jun; 195(4):531-40. PubMed ID: 19424686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What causes IOR? Attention or perception? - manipulating cue and target luminance in either blocked or mixed condition.
    Zhao Y; Heinke D
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():37-46. PubMed ID: 25199608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming.
    Marzouki Y; Grainger J; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18582840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Nature of Unconscious Attention to Subliminal Cues.
    Prasad S; Mishra RK
    Vision (Basel); 2019 Aug; 3(3):. PubMed ID: 31735839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rewards weaken cross-modal inhibition of return with visual targets.
    Qian Q; Lu M; Sun D; Wang A; Zhang M
    Perception; 2023 Jun; 52(6):400-411. PubMed ID: 37186788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. There's little return for attentional momentum.
    Snyder JJ; Schmidt WC; Kingstone A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1726-37. PubMed ID: 19968431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of different directions of attentional shift on inhibition of return in three-dimensional space.
    Wang A; Liu X; Chen Q; Zhang M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Apr; 78(3):838-47. PubMed ID: 26758976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inhibition of return affects contrast sensitivity.
    Sapir A; Jackson K; Butler J; Paul MA; Abrams RA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(7):1305-16. PubMed ID: 24321008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of temporal contingencies between cue and target onset on spatial attentional capture by subliminal onset cues.
    Schoeberl T; Ansorge U
    Psychol Res; 2019 Oct; 83(7):1416-1425. PubMed ID: 29766295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orienting of attention without awareness is affected by measurement-induced attentional control settings.
    Ivanoff J; Klein RM
    J Vis; 2003; 3(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 12678623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reaction time inhibition from subliminal cues: is it related to inhibition of return?
    Mele S; Savazzi S; Marzi CA; Berlucchi G
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Feb; 46(3):810-9. PubMed ID: 18206184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.