These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22376093)

  • 1. The impact of computer display performance on the quality of digital radiographs: a review.
    Butt A; Mahoney M; Savage NW
    Aust Dent J; 2012 Mar; 57 Suppl 1():16-23. PubMed ID: 22376093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital radiography image quality: image processing and display.
    Krupinski EA; Williams MB; Andriole K; Strauss KJ; Applegate K; Wyatt M; Bjork S; Seibert JA; ; ;
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jun; 4(6):389-400. PubMed ID: 17544140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital radiography image quality: image acquisition.
    Williams MB; Krupinski EA; Strauss KJ; Breeden WK; Rzeszotarski MS; Applegate K; Wyatt M; Bjork S; Seibert JA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jun; 4(6):371-88. PubMed ID: 17544139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital chest radiography.
    MacMahon H; Doi K
    Clin Chest Med; 1991 Mar; 12(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 2009743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality assurance tests for digital radiography in general dental practice.
    Greenall C; Drage N; Ager M
    Dent Update; 2014 Mar; 41(2):126-8, 131-4. PubMed ID: 24783881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital mammography image quality: image display.
    Siegel E; Krupinski E; Samei E; Flynn M; Andriole K; Erickson B; Thomas J; Badano A; Seibert JA; Pisano ED
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Aug; 3(8):615-27. PubMed ID: 17412136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; De Hauwere A; Voet T; Duyck P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 16442770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is digital better in dental radiography?
    Zdesar U; Fortuna T; Valantic B; Skrk D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality aspects of digital radiography in general dental practice.
    Hellén-Halme K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2007; (184):9-60. PubMed ID: 17645148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effective and quality-controlled use of digital radiography in dental practice.
    Koch S; Wagner IV; Schneider W
    Int J Comput Dent; 2000 May; 3(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 11351550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Managing patient dose in digital radiology. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.
    International Commission on Radiological Protection
    Ann ICRP; 2004; 34(1):1-73. PubMed ID: 15302167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality assurance phantom for digital dental imaging.
    Mah P; McDavid WD; Dove SB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Nov; 112(5):632-9. PubMed ID: 21862364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-aided image manipulation of intraoral radiographs to enhance diagnosis in dental practice: a review.
    Wenzel A
    Int Dent J; 1993 Apr; 43(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 8320010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Typetesting of physical characteristics of digital mammography systems: first experiences within the Flemish breast cancer screening programme.
    Thierens H; Bosmans H; Buls N; Bacher K; De Hauwere A; Jacobs J; Clerinx P
    JBR-BTR; 2007; 90(3):159-62. PubMed ID: 17696080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital detectors in mammography. A technological overview.
    Dhaenens F
    JBR-BTR; 2000 Apr; 83(2):84-7. PubMed ID: 10859905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose.
    Seibert JA
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 18849693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toward clinically relevant standardization of image quality.
    Samei E; Rowberg A; Avraham E; Cornelius C
    J Digit Imaging; 2004 Dec; 17(4):271-8. PubMed ID: 15551103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Display quality of different monitors in feline digital radiography.
    Ludewig E; Boeltzig C; Gäbler K; Werrmann A; Oechtering G
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2011; 52(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 21322381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imaging: new versus traditional technological aids.
    Sanderink GC
    Int Dent J; 1993 Aug; 43(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 8276517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Review of image quality standards to control digital X-ray systems.
    Schreiner-Karoussou A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):23-5. PubMed ID: 16464831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.