These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Rotating item banks versus restriction of maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing. Barrada JR; Olea J; Abad FJ Span J Psychol; 2008 Nov; 11(2):618-25. PubMed ID: 18988447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Impact of Item Parameter Drift in Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT). Risk N J Appl Meas; 2016; 17(1):54-78. PubMed ID: 26784378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On initial item selection in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing. Xu G; Wang C; Shang Z Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):291-315. PubMed ID: 27435032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Varying the valuating function and the presentable bank in computerized adaptive testing. Barrada JR; Abad FJ; Olea J Span J Psychol; 2011 May; 14(1):500-8. PubMed ID: 21568205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Components of the item selection algorithm in computerized adaptive testing. Han KCT J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2018; 15():7. PubMed ID: 29575849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The maximum priority index method for severely constrained item selection in computerized adaptive testing. Cheng Y; Chang HH Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):369-83. PubMed ID: 18534047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimal Online Calibration Designs for Item Replenishment in Adaptive Testing. He Y; Chen P Psychometrika; 2020 Mar; 85(1):35-55. PubMed ID: 31531789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adaptive testing for psychological assessment: how many items are enough to run an adaptive testing algorithm? Wagner-Menghin MM; Masters GN J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):106-17. PubMed ID: 23816590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting item exposure parameters in computerized adaptive testing. Chen SY; Doong SH Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):75-91. PubMed ID: 18482476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Rate Function Approach to Computerized Adaptive Testing for Cognitive Diagnosis. Liu J; Ying Z; Zhang S Psychometrika; 2015 Jun; 80(2):468-90. PubMed ID: 24327068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times. Glas CA; van der Linden WJ Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of item pool restriction on the precision of ability measurement for a Rasch-based CAT: comparisons to traditional fixed length examinations. Halkitis PN J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(2):97-122. PubMed ID: 9661734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Statistical Foundations for Computerized Adaptive Testing with Response Revision. Wang S; Fellouris G; Chang HH Psychometrika; 2019 Jun; 84(2):375-394. PubMed ID: 30805879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maximum information stratification method for controlling item exposure in computerized adaptive testing. Barrada JR; Mazuela P; Olea J Psicothema; 2006 Feb; 18(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 17296025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimal Item Calibration for Computerized Achievement Tests. Ul Hassan M; Miller F Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):1101-1128. PubMed ID: 31183669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]