BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22380366)

  • 1. Accuracy of the electron transport in mcnp5 and its suitability for ionization chamber response simulations: A comparison with the egsnrc and penelope codes.
    Koivunoro H; Siiskonen T; Kotiluoto P; Auterinen I; Hippelainen E; Savolainen S
    Med Phys; 2012 Mar; 39(3):1335-44. PubMed ID: 22380366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of penh, fluka, and Geant4/topas for absorbed dose calculations in air cavities representing ionization chambers in high-energy photon and proton beams.
    Baumann KS; Horst F; Zink K; Gomà C
    Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 46(10):4639-4653. PubMed ID: 31350915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determining the effects of microsphere and surrounding material composition on (90)Y dose kernels using egsnrc and mcnp5.
    Paxton AB; Davis SD; Dewerd LA
    Med Phys; 2012 Mar; 39(3):1424-34. PubMed ID: 22380375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bone and mucosal dosimetry in skin radiation therapy: a Monte Carlo study using kilovoltage photon and megavoltage electron beams.
    Chow JC; Jiang R
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(12):3885-99. PubMed ID: 22642985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monte Carlo study of the depth-dependent fluence perturbation in parallel-plate ionization chambers in electron beams.
    Zink K; Czarnecki D; Looe HK; von Voigts-Rhetz P; Harder D
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111707. PubMed ID: 25370621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between EGSnrc, Geant4, MCNP5 and Penelope for mono-energetic electron beams.
    Archambault JP; Mainegra-Hing E
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 60(13):4951-62. PubMed ID: 26060927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monte Carlo study of in-field and out-of-field dose distributions from a linear accelerator operating with and without a flattening-filter.
    Almberg SS; Frengen J; Lindmo T
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5194-203. PubMed ID: 22894444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monte Carlo dose calculations in homogeneous media and at interfaces: a comparison between GEPTS, EGSnrc, MCNP, and measurements.
    Chibani O; Li XA
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):835-47. PubMed ID: 12033580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The response of a radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeter in megavoltage photon and electron beams.
    Araki F; Ohno T
    Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):122102. PubMed ID: 25471975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Determination of kQmsr,Q0fmsr,fref factors for ion chambers used in the calibration of Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion model using EGSnrc and PENELOPE Monte Carlo codes.
    Mirzakhanian L; Benmakhlouf H; Tessier F; Seuntjens J
    Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1748-1757. PubMed ID: 29468677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Energy-loss straggling algorithms for Monte Carlo electron transport.
    Chibani O
    Med Phys; 2002 Oct; 29(10):2374-83. PubMed ID: 12408312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monte Carlo calculations of electron beam quality conversion factors for several ion chamber types.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111701. PubMed ID: 25370615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Doppler broadening effect on low-energy photon dose calculations using MCNP5 and PENELOPE.
    Ye SJ; Ove R; Naqvi SA
    Health Phys; 2006 Oct; 91(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 16966879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monte Carlo calculations for reference dosimetry of electron beams with the PTW Roos and NE2571 ion chambers.
    Muir BR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121722. PubMed ID: 24320508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of PENELOPE Monte Carlo dose calculations with Fricke dosimeter and ionization chamber measurements in heterogeneous phantoms (18 MeV electron and 12 MV photon beams).
    Blazy L; Baltes D; Bordy JM; Cutarella D; Delaunay F; Gouriou J; Leroy E; Ostrowsky A; Beaumont S
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5951-65. PubMed ID: 17068376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dose discrepancies between Monte Carlo calculations and measurements in the buildup region for a high-energy photon beam.
    Ding GX
    Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2459-63. PubMed ID: 12462709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
    Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On the wall perturbation correction for a parallel-plate NACP-02 chamber in clinical electron beams.
    Zink K; Wulff J
    Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):1045-54. PubMed ID: 21452742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Technical note: Influence of the phantom material on the absorbed-dose energy dependence of the EBT3 radiochromic film for photons in the energy range 3 keV-18 MeV.
    Hermida-López M; Lüdemann L; Flühs A; Brualla L
    Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):112103. PubMed ID: 25370654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monte Carlo simulation of electron beams from an accelerator head using PENELOPE.
    Sempau J; Sánchez-Reyes A; Salvat F; ben Tahar HO; Jiang SB; Fernández-Varea JM
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Apr; 46(4):1163-86. PubMed ID: 11324958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.