These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22381488)

  • 1. Effects of thread depth, taper shape, and taper length on the mechanical properties of mini-implants.
    Chang JZ; Chen YJ; Tung YY; Chiang YY; Lai EH; Chen WP; Lin CP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Mar; 141(3):279-288. PubMed ID: 22381488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical evaluation of an orthodontic miniimplant used with revolving (translation and rotation) temporary anchorage device by finite element analysis and experimental testing.
    Lin YS; Yu JH; Chang YZ; Lin CL
    Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 23303268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of contributions of orthodontic mini-screw design factors based on FE analysis and the Taguchi method.
    Lin CL; Yu JH; Liu HL; Lin CH; Lin YS
    J Biomech; 2010 Aug; 43(11):2174-81. PubMed ID: 20466376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional modeling and finite element analysis in treatment planning for orthodontic tooth movement.
    Ammar HH; Ngan P; Crout RJ; Mucino VH; Mukdadi OM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):e59-71. PubMed ID: 21195258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of the taper shape, dual-thread, and length on the mechanical properties of mini-implants.
    Kim YK; Kim YJ; Yun PY; Kim JW
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Sep; 79(5):908-14. PubMed ID: 19705930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Finite element analysis of miniscrew implants used for orthodontic anchorage.
    Liu TC; Chang CH; Wong TY; Liu JK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):468-76. PubMed ID: 22464529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of mini-implant length and diameter on primary stability under loading with two force levels.
    Chatzigianni A; Keilig L; Reimann S; Eliades T; Bourauel C
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 21062964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis.
    Sung SJ; Jang GW; Chun YS; Moon YS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 20451784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants of different lengths.
    Pithon MM; Figueiredo DS; Oliveira DD
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 71(3):479-86. PubMed ID: 23273488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of different implant materials on the primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Pan CY; Chou ST; Tseng YC; Yang YH; Wu CY; Lan TH; Liu PH; Chang HP
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2012 Dec; 28(12):673-8. PubMed ID: 23217360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture resistance of commonly used self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants.
    Smith A; Hosein YK; Dunning CE; Tassi A
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 24869900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of bone architecture on the primary stability of different mini-implant designs.
    da Cunha AC; Marquezan M; Lima I; Lopes RT; Nojima LI; Sant'Anna EF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 25533071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strain of bone-implant interface and insertion torque regarding different miniscrew thread designs using an artificial bone model.
    Cha JY; Hwang CJ; Kwon SH; Jung HS; Kim KM; Yu HS
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):268-74. PubMed ID: 25296728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Micrographic study and torsional strength of grade 23 titanium mini-implants recycled for orthodontic purposes.
    Kaci N; Hakem K; Laraba S; Benrekaa N; Le Gall M
    Int Orthod; 2018 Jun; 16(2):246-257. PubMed ID: 29628423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of mechanical strengths of three types of mini-implants in artificial bones.
    Tseng YC; Wu JH; Ting CC; Chen HS; Chen CM
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2017 Feb; 33(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 28137418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stress distribution in the mini-screw and alveolar bone during orthodontic treatment: a finite element study analysis.
    Kuroda S; Nishii Y; Okano S; Sueishi K
    J Orthod; 2014 Dec; 41(4):275-84. PubMed ID: 24812100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture resistance of orthodontic mini-implants: a biomechanical in vitro study.
    Wilmes B; Panayotidis A; Drescher D
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):396-401. PubMed ID: 21310766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of bone quality, implant type, and implantation site preparation on insertion torques of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage.
    Wilmes B; Drescher D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 40(7):697-703. PubMed ID: 21458232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength, stability, and stress distribution in orthodontic anchorage: a conical, self-drilling miniscrew implant system.
    Singh S; Mogra S; Shetty VS; Shetty S; Philip P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Mar; 141(3):327-336. PubMed ID: 22381493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Morphological evaluation of the active tip of six types of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Kitahara-Céia FM; Assad-Loss TF; Mucha JN; Elias CN
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(2):36-41. PubMed ID: 23916430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.