111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22381563)
1. Digital image analysis versus clinical assessment of wound epithelialization: a validation study.
Bloemen MC; Boekema BK; Vlig M; van Zuijlen PP; Middelkoop E
Burns; 2012 Jun; 38(4):501-5. PubMed ID: 22381563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective observational study comparing burn surgeons' estimations of wound healing after skin grafting to photo-assisted methods.
Koetsier KS; Wong JN; Muffley LA; Carrougher GJ; Pham TN; Gibran NS
Burns; 2019 Nov; 45(7):1562-1570. PubMed ID: 31229300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of subjective wound assessment.
Bloemen MC; van Zuijlen PP; Middelkoop E
Burns; 2011 Jun; 37(4):566-71. PubMed ID: 21388743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wound debridement: Comparative reliability of three methods for measuring fibrin percentage in chronic wounds.
Laplaud AL; Blaizot X; Gaillard C; Morice A; Lebreuilly I; Clément C; Parienti JJ; Dompmartin A
Wound Repair Regen; 2010; 18(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 20082676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of photographic analysis of wound epithelialization assessed in human skin graft donor sites and epidermolysis bullosa wounds.
Rennekampff HO; Fimmers R; Metelmann HR; Schumann H; Tenenhaus M
Trials; 2015 May; 16():235. PubMed ID: 26018577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PVP-iodine in hydrosomes and hydrogel--a novel concept in wound therapy leads to enhanced epithelialization and reduced loss of skin grafts.
Vogt PM; Reimer K; Hauser J; Rossbach O; Steinau HU; Bosse B; Muller S; Schmidt T; Fleischer W
Burns; 2006 Sep; 32(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 16837138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Photoplanimetric evaluation and impedance measurement of split-thickness skin grafts: a new model for objective wound-healing assessment in clinical trials.
Hauser J; Lehnhardt M; Daigeler A; Langer S; Steinau HU; Vogt PM
Skin Res Technol; 2009 May; 15(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 19622126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative evaluation of elderly skin based on digital image analysis.
Tanaka H; Nakagami G; Sanada H; Sari Y; Kobayashi H; Kishi K; Konya C; Tadaka E
Skin Res Technol; 2008 May; 14(2):192-200. PubMed ID: 18412562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Concurrent validation and reliability of digital image analysis of granulation tissue color for clinical pressure ulcers.
Iizaka S; Sugama J; Nakagami G; Kaitani T; Naito A; Koyanagi H; Matsuo J; Kadono T; Konya C; Sanada H
Wound Repair Regen; 2011; 19(4):455-63. PubMed ID: 21518090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An assessment of the accuracy and usability of a novel optical wound measurement system.
Bowling FL; King L; Fadavi H; Paterson JA; Preece K; Daniel RW; Matthews DJ; Boulton AJ
Diabet Med; 2009 Jan; 26(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 19125768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital imaging of wounds: are measurements reproducible among observers?
Quan SY; Lazarus GS; Kohli AR; Kapoor R; Margolis DJ
Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2007 Dec; 6(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 18048869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experience with the modified Meek technique.
Raff T; Hartmann B; Wagner H; Germann G
Acta Chir Plast; 1996; 38(4):142-6. PubMed ID: 9037792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A study of the efficiency and convenience of an advanced portable Wound Measurement System (VISITRAK).
Sugama J; Matsui Y; Sanada H; Konya C; Okuwa M; Kitagawa A
J Clin Nurs; 2007 Jul; 16(7):1265-9. PubMed ID: 17584344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Wound status evaluation using color image processing.
Hansen GL; Sparrow EM; Kokate JY; Leland KJ; Iaizzo PA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Feb; 16(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 9050410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new digital image analysis system useful for surface assessment of vitiligo lesions in transplantation studies.
Van Geel N; Vander Haeghen Y; Ongenae K; Naeyaert JM
Eur J Dermatol; 2004; 14(3):150-5. PubMed ID: 15246939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of computer-assisted and manual wound size measurement.
Thawer HA; Houghton PE; Woodbury MG; Keast D; Campbell K
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2002 Oct; 48(10):46-53. PubMed ID: 12378003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 3D photography is as accurate as digital planimetry tracing in determining burn wound area.
Stockton KA; McMillan CM; Storey KJ; David MC; Kimble RM
Burns; 2015 Feb; 41(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 24877886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The FLIR ONE thermal imager for the assessment of burn wounds: Reliability and validity study.
Jaspers MEH; Carrière ME; Meij-de Vries A; Klaessens JHGM; van Zuijlen PPM
Burns; 2017 Nov; 43(7):1516-1523. PubMed ID: 28536040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of burn depth and burn wound healing potential.
Monstrey S; Hoeksema H; Verbelen J; Pirayesh A; Blondeel P
Burns; 2008 Sep; 34(6):761-9. PubMed ID: 18511202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The reliability of digital images when used to assess burn wounds.
Jones OC; Wilson DI; Andrews S
J Telemed Telecare; 2003; 9 Suppl 1():S22-4. PubMed ID: 12952710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
