BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22381663)

  • 1. Low radiation coronary calcium scoring by dual-source CT with tube current optimization based on patient body size.
    Dey D; Nakazato R; Pimentel R; Paz W; Hayes SW; Friedman JD; Cheng VY; Thomson LE; Slomka PJ; Berman DS
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2012; 6(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 22381663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Very low-dose coronary artery calcium scanning with high-pitch spiral acquisition mode: comparison between 120-kV and 100-kV tube voltage protocols.
    Marwan M; Mettin C; Pflederer T; Seltmann M; Schuhbäck A; Muschiol G; Ropers D; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 23333186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coronary artery calcium scoring using a reduced tube voltage and radiation dose protocol with dual-source computed tomography.
    Nakazato R; Dey D; Gutstein A; Le Meunier L; Cheng VY; Pimentel R; Paz W; Hayes SW; Thomson LE; Friedman JD; Berman DS
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2009; 3(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 20083060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiation dose reduction by using 100-kV tube voltage in cardiac 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study.
    Feuchtner GM; Jodocy D; Klauser A; Haberfellner B; Aglan I; Spoeck A; Hiehs S; Soegner P; Jaschke W
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e51-6. PubMed ID: 19671491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated attenuation-based selection of tube voltage and tube current for coronary CT angiography: reduction of radiation exposure versus a BMI-based strategy with an expert investigator.
    Layritz C; Muschiol G; Flohr T; Bietau C; Marwan M; Schuhbaeck A; Schmid J; Ropers D; Achenbach S; Pflederer T
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(5):303-10. PubMed ID: 24268117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Radiation and contrast agent doses reductions by using 80-kV tube voltage in coronary computed tomographic angiography: a comparative study.
    Cao JX; Wang YM; Lu JG; Zhang Y; Wang P; Yang C
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):309-14. PubMed ID: 24315475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary angiography with third-generation dual-source CT at 70 kVp tube voltage: feasibility, image quality, radiation dose, and effect of iterative reconstruction.
    Hell MM; Bittner D; Schuhbaeck A; Muschiol G; Brand M; Lell M; Uder M; Achenbach S; Marwan M
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(6):418-25. PubMed ID: 25439789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective evaluation of the influence of iterative reconstruction on the reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in reduced radiation dose 320 detector row CT.
    Choi AD; Leifer ES; Yu J; Shanbhag SM; Bronson K; Arai AE; Chen MY
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 27591767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feasibility of coronary artery calcium scoring on virtual unenhanced images derived from single-source fast kVp-switching dual-energy coronary CT angiography.
    Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Okamura T; Yamada M; Tanami Y; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(5):391-400. PubMed ID: 25301045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiation dose reduction for coronary artery calcium scoring at 320-detector CT with adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D.
    Tatsugami F; Higaki T; Fukumoto W; Kaichi Y; Fujioka C; Kiguchi M; Yamamoto H; Kihara Y; Awai K
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jun; 31(5):1045-52. PubMed ID: 25754302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of reduced x-ray tube voltage, low iodine concentration contrast medium, and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction on image quality and radiation dose at coronary CT angiography: results of the prospective multicenter REALISE trial.
    Yin WH; Lu B; Gao JB; Li PL; Sun K; Wu ZF; Yang WJ; Zhang XQ; Zheng MW; McQuiston AD; Meinel FG; Schoepf UJ
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 25843243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Achieving consistent image quality and overall radiation dose reduction for coronary CT angiography with body mass index-dependent tube voltage and tube current selection.
    Wang G; Gao J; Zhao S; Sun X; Chen X; Cui X
    Clin Radiol; 2014 Sep; 69(9):945-51. PubMed ID: 24909505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Coronary calcium scoring from contrast coronary CT angiography using a semiautomated standardized method.
    Schuhbaeck A; Otaki Y; Achenbach S; Schneider C; Slomka P; Berman DS; Dey D
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(5):446-53. PubMed ID: 26169700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective randomized controlled trial to assess the diagnostic performance of reduced tube voltage for coronary CT angiography.
    Leipsic J; LaBounty TM; Mancini GB; Heilbron B; Taylor C; Johnson MA; Hague C; Earls JP; Ajlan A; Min JK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Apr; 196(4):801-6. PubMed ID: 21427328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of attenuation-based tube current control in coronary artery calcium scoring on prospective ECG-triggered 64-detector CT.
    Horiguchi J; Matsuura N; Yamamoto H; Kitagawa T; Sato K; Kihara Y; Ito K
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1231-40. PubMed ID: 19515586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Body mass index-adapted prospective coronary computed tomography angiography. Determining the lowest limit for diagnostic purposes.
    Hosch W; Hofmann NP; Mueller D; Iwan J; Gitsioudis G; Siebert S; Giannitsis E; Kauczor HU; Katus HA; Korosoglou G
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):e232-9. PubMed ID: 23332891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultra-low-dose coronary artery calcium scoring using novel scoring thresholds for low tube voltage protocols-a pilot study.
    Gräni C; Vontobel J; Benz DC; Bacanovic S; Giannopoulos AA; Messerli M; Grossmann M; Gebhard C; Pazhenkottil AP; Gaemperli O; Kaufmann PA; Buechel RR
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Dec; 19(12):1362-1371. PubMed ID: 29432592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low- vs. standard-dose coronary artery calcium scanning.
    Hecht HS; de Siqueira ME; Cham M; Yip R; Narula J; Henschke C; Yankelevitz D
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Apr; 16(4):358-63. PubMed ID: 25381303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Finding the optimal dose reduction and iterative reconstruction level for coronary calcium scoring.
    Willemink MJ; den Harder AM; Foppen W; Schilham AM; Rienks R; Laufer EM; Nieman K; de Jong PA; Budde RP; Nathoe HM; Leiner T
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 26342405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiation dose of cardiac dual-source CT: the effect of tailoring the protocol to patient-specific parameters.
    Alkadhi H; Stolzmann P; Scheffel H; Desbiolles L; Baumüller S; Plass A; Genoni M; Marincek B; Leschka S
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3):385-91. PubMed ID: 18976876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.