584 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22382748)
1. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists consensus report.
Benavides E; Rios HF; Ganz SD; An CH; Resnik R; Reardon GT; Feldman SJ; Mah JK; Hatcher D; Kim MJ; Sohn DS; Palti A; Perel ML; Judy KW; Misch CE; Wang HL
Implant Dent; 2012 Apr; 21(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 22382748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use.
Jacobs R; Salmon B; Codari M; Hassan B; Bornstein MM
BMC Oral Health; 2018 May; 18(1):88. PubMed ID: 29764458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implant-guided volumetric analysis of edentulous maxillary bone with cone-beam computerized tomography scan. Maxillary sinus pneumatization classification.
Tolstunov L; Thai D; Arellano L
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Aug; 38(4):377-90. PubMed ID: 22913308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of cone-beam computed tomography in early detection of implant failure.
Yepes JF; Al-Sabbagh M
Dent Clin North Am; 2015 Jan; 59(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 25434558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Management of Patients Requiring Dental Implants: An American Academy of Periodontology Best Evidence Review.
Rios HF; Borgnakke WS; Benavides E
J Periodontol; 2017 Oct; 88(10):946-959. PubMed ID: 28967330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cone Beam Computed Tomography vs Multislice Computed Tomography in Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacture Guided Implant Surgery Based on Three-Dimensional Optical Scanning and Stereolithographic Guides: Does Image Modality Matter?
Widmann G; Fischer B; Berggren JP; Dennhardt A; Schullian P; Reto B; Puelacher W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):527-33. PubMed ID: 27183061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dental imaging in implant treatment planning.
Chan HL; Misch K; Wang HL
Implant Dent; 2010 Aug; 19(4):288-98. PubMed ID: 20683285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Group 5 ITI Consensus Report: Digital technologies.
Wismeijer D; Joda T; Flügge T; Fokas G; Tahmaseb A; Bechelli D; Bohner L; Bornstein M; Burgoyne A; Caram S; Carmichael R; Chen CY; Coucke W; Derksen W; Donos N; El Kholy K; Evans C; Fehmer V; Fickl S; Fragola G; Gimenez Gonzales B; Gholami H; Hashim D; Hui Y; Kökat A; Vazouras K; Kühl S; Lanis A; Leesungbok R; van der Meer J; Liu Z; Sato T; De Souza A; Scarfe WC; Tosta M; van Zyl P; Vach K; Vaughn V; Vucetic M; Wang P; Wen B; Wu V
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():436-442. PubMed ID: 30328201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Morphology of the nasopalatine canal and dental implant surgery: a radiographic analysis of 100 consecutive patients using limited cone-beam computed tomography.
Bornstein MM; Balsiger R; Sendi P; von Arx T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Mar; 22(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 21039896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The reliability of cone-beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: a histomorphometric analysis by micro-CT.
González-García R; Monje F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):871-9. PubMed ID: 22250839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of restoratively projected and surgically acceptable virtual implant position for mandibular overdentures.
Scarfe W; Vaughn WS; Farman AG; Harris BT; Paris MM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 22299087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites.
Hatcher DC; Dial C; Mayorga C
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2003 Nov; 31(11):825-33. PubMed ID: 14696834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Should Cone Beam Computed Tomography Be Routinely Obtained in Implant Planning?
Omami G; Al Yafi F
Dent Clin North Am; 2019 Jul; 63(3):363-379. PubMed ID: 31097132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
Lofthag-Hansen S
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography.
Tyndall DA; Price JB; Tetradis S; Ganz SD; Hildebolt C; Scarfe WC;
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Jun; 113(6):817-26. PubMed ID: 22668710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing validity of actual tooth height and width from cone beam images of cadavers with subsequent dissection to aid oral surgery.
Benninger B; Peterson A; Cook V
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):302-6. PubMed ID: 21684648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of linear measurements on CBCT images related to presurgical implant treatment planning: A systematic review.
Fokas G; Vaughn VM; Scarfe WC; Bornstein MM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():393-415. PubMed ID: 30328204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning.
Dreiseidler T; Neugebauer J; Ritter L; Lingohr T; Rothamel D; Mischkowski RA; Zöller JE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1191-9. PubMed ID: 19681962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Presurgical planning in implant restorations: correct interpretation of cone-beam computed tomography for improved imaging.
Kourtis S; Skondra E; Roussou I; Skondras EV
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2012 Oct; 24(5):321-32. PubMed ID: 23025315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cone beam computed tomography-assisted treatment planning concepts.
Ganz SD
Dent Clin North Am; 2011 Jul; 55(3):515-36, viii. PubMed ID: 21726687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
