250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22382754)
1. Accuracy of linear measurements in cone beam computed tomography with different voxel sizes.
Torres MG; Campos PS; Segundo NP; Navarro M; Crusoé-Rebello I
Implant Dent; 2012 Apr; 21(2):150-5. PubMed ID: 22382754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
Timock AM; Cook V; McDonald T; Leo MC; Crowe J; Benninger BL; Covell DA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):734-44. PubMed ID: 22051495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of scan mode (180°/360°) of the cone beam computed tomography for preoperative dental implant measurements.
Neves FS; Vasconcelos TV; Campos PS; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):e155-8. PubMed ID: 23231370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of bone surface size and cortical layer thickness measurements using cone beam computerized tomography.
Gerlach NL; Meijer GJ; Borstlap WA; Bronkhorst EM; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jul; 24(7):793-7. PubMed ID: 22469137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of linear measurements and visibility of the mandibular canal of cone-beam computed tomography images with different voxel sizes: an in vitro study.
Waltrick KB; Nunes de Abreu Junior MJ; Corrêa M; Zastrow MD; Dutra VD
J Periodontol; 2013 Jan; 84(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 22390549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vertical bone measurements from cone beam computed tomography images using different software packages.
Vasconcelos TV; Neves FS; Moraes LA; Freitas DQ
Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of assessing the mandibular canal on cone-beam computed tomography: a validation study.
Gerlach NL; Ghaeminia H; Bronkhorst EM; Bergé SJ; Meijer GJ; Maal TJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 72(4):666-71. PubMed ID: 24480773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of bone width lateral to the mandibular canal as an alternative approach for implant installation.
Daróz SR; Cardoso ES; Manso MC; Vidigal GM
Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23303270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of anterior loop length for the mandibular canal and diameter of the mandibular incisive canal to avoid nerve damage when installing endosseous implants in the interforaminal region: a second attempt introducing cone beam computed tomography.
Uchida Y; Noguchi N; Goto M; Yamashita Y; Hanihara T; Takamori H; Sato I; Kawai T; Yosue T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):744-50. PubMed ID: 19304029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The reliability of using postero-anterior cephalometry and cone-beam CT to determine transverse dimensions in clinical practice.
Tai B; Goonewardene MS; Murray K; Koong B; Islam SM
Aust Orthod J; 2014 Nov; 30(2):132-42. PubMed ID: 25549515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of linear measurements from cone-beam computed tomography-derived surface models of different voxel sizes.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; Huddleston Slater JJ; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jan; 137(1):16.e1-6; discussion 16-7. PubMed ID: 20122425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of reliability and reproducibility of linear measurements of cone-beam-computed tomography.
Santos Tde S; Gomes AC; de Melo DG; Melo AR; Cavalcante JR; de Araújo LC; Travassos RM; Martins-Filho PR; Piva MR; Silva HF
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):473-8. PubMed ID: 23257480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of linear measurements using dental cone beam and conventional multislice computed tomography.
Suomalainen A; Vehmas T; Kortesniemi M; Robinson S; Peltola J
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jan; 37(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 18195249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anatomical landmarks of mandibular interforaminal region related to dental implant placement with 3D CBCT: comparison between edentulous and dental mandibles.
Sener E; Onem E; Akar GC; Govsa F; Ozer MA; Pinar Y; Mert A; Baksi Sen BG
Surg Radiol Anat; 2018 Jun; 40(6):615-623. PubMed ID: 29124343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of dentoskeletal changes after asymmetric rapid maxillary expansion.
Baka ZM; Akin M; Ucar FI; Ileri Z
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 25533073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in dental implant treatment planning.
Luangchana P; Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S; Kiattavorncharoen S; Jirajariyavej B
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1287-94. PubMed ID: 26574854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationships between bone density values from cone beam computed tomography, maximum insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis at implant placement: a pilot study.
Fuster-Torres MÁ; Peñarrocha-Diago M; Peñarrocha-Oltra D; Peñarrocha-Diago M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):1051-6. PubMed ID: 22010089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Using cone beam computed tomography to determine safe regions for implant placement.
Sokhn S; Nasseh I; Noujeim M
Gen Dent; 2011; 59(2):e72-7. PubMed ID: 21903512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Availability of Software-Based Correction of Mandibular Plane for the Vertical Measurement of the Mandible in Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Han SS; Lee KM; Kim KD
Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():808625. PubMed ID: 26579540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of 64-Detector-Multislice and Cone Beam Computed Tomographies in the Evaluation of Linear Measurements in the Alveolar Ridge.
Pena de Andrade JG; Valerio CS; de Oliveira Monteiro MA; de Carvalho Machado V; Manzi FR
Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(2):132-4. PubMed ID: 26929949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
