These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22382754)

  • 21. Subjective image quality assessment of cross sectional imaging methods for the symphyseal region of the mandible prior to dental implant placement.
    Shelley AM; Brunton P; Horner K
    J Dent; 2011 Nov; 39(11):764-70. PubMed ID: 21875641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of Head Orientation in Linear Measurement for Implant Planning in Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A; Tabari S; Yarmohammadi S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Jul; 16(7):542-6. PubMed ID: 26329408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A new, highly precise measurement technology for the in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of digital imaging data.
    von Wilmowsky C; Bergauer B; Nkenke E; Neukam FW; Neuhuber W; Lell M; Keller A; Eitner S; Matta RE
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1335-9. PubMed ID: 26189144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and medical computed tomography: implications for clinical diagnostics with guided surgery.
    Abboud M; Calvo-Guirado JL; Orentlicher G; Wahl G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):536-42. PubMed ID: 23527357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reliability of voxel gray values in cone beam computed tomography for preoperative implant planning assessment.
    Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; Motroni A; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1438-42. PubMed ID: 23189294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Precision and accuracy of suggested maxillary and mandibular landmarks with cone-beam computed tomography for regional superimpositions: An in vitro study.
    Lemieux G; Carey JP; Flores-Mir C; Secanell M; Hart A; Lagravère MO
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 26718380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of linear measurements of bone for implant sites in the presence of metallic artefacts using cone beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography.
    Cremonini CC; Dumas M; Pannuti CM; Neto JB; Cavalcanti MG; Lima LA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(8):845-50. PubMed ID: 21621979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of CBCT imaging when placing dental implants in the anterior edentulous mandible: a before-after study.
    Shelley AM; Ferrero A; Brunton P; Goodwin M; Horner K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(4):20140316. PubMed ID: 25472617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging compared with computed tomography for implant planning.
    Aguiar MF; Marques AP; Carvalho AC; Cavalcanti MG
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Apr; 19(4):362-5. PubMed ID: 18266874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models.
    Akyalcin S; Cozad BE; English JD; Colville CD; Laman S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Dec; 144(6):916-22. PubMed ID: 24286915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position.
    Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Sanderink G
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 19106265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison between 3D volumetric rendering and multiplanar slices on the reliability of linear measurements on CBCT images: an in vitro study.
    Fernandes TM; Adamczyk J; Poleti ML; Henriques JF; Friedland B; Garib DG
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2015; 23(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 25004053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of cone-beam and conventional multislice computed tomography for image-guided dental implant planning.
    Poeschl PW; Schmidt N; Guevara-Rojas G; Seemann R; Ewers R; Zipko HT; Schicho K
    Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):317-24. PubMed ID: 22411262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of the potential of automatic segmentation of the mandibular canal using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Gerlach NL; Meijer GJ; Kroon DJ; Bronkhorst EM; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Nov; 52(9):838-44. PubMed ID: 25156043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
    Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of linear measurements on CBCT images related to presurgical implant treatment planning: A systematic review.
    Fokas G; Vaughn VM; Scarfe WC; Bornstein MM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():393-415. PubMed ID: 30328204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on multi-slice and cone beam computed tomography scans to detect the mandibular canal during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible.
    Freire-Maia B; Machado VD; Valerio CS; Custódio AL; Manzi FR; Junqueira JL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Mar; 46(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 27939592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
    Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Morphometric analysis - Cone beam computed tomography to predict bone quality and quantity.
    Hohlweg-Majert B; Metzger MC; Kummer T; Schulze D
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 39(5):330-4. PubMed ID: 21030266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluating craniofacial asymmetry with digital cephalometric images and cone-beam computed tomography.
    de Moraes ME; Hollender LG; Chen CS; Moraes LC; Balducci I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):e523-31. PubMed ID: 21640864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.