197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22383208)
61. Efficacy of peracetic acid in rapid disinfection of Resilon and gutta-percha cones compared with sodium hypochlorite, chlorhexidine, and povidone-iodine.
Subha N; Prabhakar V; Koshy M; Abinaya K; Prabu M; Thangavelu L
J Endod; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1261-4. PubMed ID: 24041388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Evaluation of two alternative methods for disinfection of toothbrushes and tongue scrapers.
Spolidorio DM; Tardivo TA; dos Reis Derceli J; Neppelenbroek KH; Duque C; Spolidorio LC; Pires JR
Int J Dent Hyg; 2011 Nov; 9(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 21356033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Susceptibility of MRSA biofilms to denture-cleansing agents.
Lee D; Howlett J; Pratten J; Mordan N; McDonald A; Wilson M; Ready D
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2009 Feb; 291(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 19146578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. A statistical comparison of denture sanitation using a commercially available denture cleaner with and without microwaving.
Goodson LB; Glass RT; Bullard JW; Conrad RS
Gen Dent; 2003; 51(2):148-51. PubMed ID: 15055687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Immersion disinfection of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions with sodium hypochlorite. Part I: Microbiology.
Beyerle MP; Hensley DM; Bradley DV; Schwartz RS; Hilton TJ
Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(3):234-8. PubMed ID: 7916888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Effectiveness of two methods of denture sterilization.
Webb BC; Thomas CJ; Harty DW; Willcox MD
J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Jun; 25(6):416-23. PubMed ID: 9687113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Laboratory evaluation of anti-biofilm agents for use in dental unit waterlines.
Meiller TF; Kelley JI; Baqui AA; DePaola LG
J Clin Dent; 2001; 12(4):97-103. PubMed ID: 11507923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Effectiveness of different chemical agents for disinfection of gutta-percha cones.
Nabeshima CK; Machado ME; Britto ML; Pallotta RC
Aust Endod J; 2011 Dec; 37(3):118-21. PubMed ID: 22117718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Surface Disinfectants for Burn Units Evaluated by a New Double Method, Using Microorganisms Recently Isolated From Patients, on a Surface Germ-Carrier Model.
Herruzo R; Vizcaino MJ; Herruzo I; Sanchez M
J Burn Care Res; 2017; 38(3):e663-e669. PubMed ID: 27685810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Comparison of the effectiveness of several denture sanitizing systems: a clinical study.
Glass RT; Goodson LB; Bullard JW; Conrad RS
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2001 Dec; 22(12):1093-6, 1098, 1100-2 passim; quiz 1108. PubMed ID: 11887672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Antimicrobial action of sodium hypochlorite and castor oil solutions for denture cleaning - in vitro evaluation.
Salles MM; Oliveira Vde C; Souza RF; Silva CH; Paranhos Hde F
Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():1-6. PubMed ID: 26313346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Candida albicans adherence to denture base material: chemical disinfection and the effect of acquired salivary pellicle formation.
Rodríguez Acosta EJ; da Silva PM; Jacobina M; Lara VS; Neppelenbroek KH; Porto VC
J Prosthodont; 2015 Apr; 24(3):200-6. PubMed ID: 25142962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Use of atmospheric non-thermal plasma as a disinfectant for objects contaminated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Burts ML; Alexeff I; Meek ET; McCullers JA
Am J Infect Control; 2009 Nov; 37(9):729-33. PubMed ID: 19559504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Disinfection protocols to prevent cross-contamination between dental offices and prosthetic laboratories.
Salvia AC; Matilde Fdos S; Rosa FC; Kimpara ET; Jorge AO; Balducci I; Koga-Ito CY
J Infect Public Health; 2013 Oct; 6(5):377-82. PubMed ID: 23999338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Efficacy of different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine in disinfection of contaminated Resilon cones.
Zand V; Salem-Milani A; Shahi S; Akhi MT; Vazifekhah S
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2012 Mar; 17(2):e352-5. PubMed ID: 22143703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Effect of disposable barriers, disinfection, and cleaning on controlling methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus environmental contamination.
Petti S; Polimeni A; Dancer SJ
Am J Infect Control; 2013 Sep; 41(9):836-40. PubMed ID: 23375575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Comparison of the efficacy of a hydrogen peroxide dry-mist disinfection system and sodium hypochlorite solution for eradication of Clostridium difficile spores.
Barbut F; Menuet D; Verachten M; Girou E
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 30(6):507-14. PubMed ID: 19379098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Suitability of two commercial preparations for disinfections against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in veterinary medicine.
Yilmaz A; Kaleta EF
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2009 May; 116(5):180-5. PubMed ID: 19462641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Disinfection of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms using a remote non-thermal gas plasma.
Cotter JJ; Maguire P; Soberon F; Daniels S; O'Gara JP; Casey E
J Hosp Infect; 2011 Jul; 78(3):204-7. PubMed ID: 21601949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Effect of disinfectants on the hardness and roughness of reline acrylic resins.
Azevedo A; Machado AL; Vergani CE; Giampaolo ET; Pavarina AC; Magnani R
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(4):235-42. PubMed ID: 16827736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
