These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22383324)

  • 1. The Burch-Schneider cage: 9-year survival in Paprosky type 3 acetabular defects. Clinical and radiological follow-up.
    Jones L; Grammatopoulos G; Singer G
    Hip Int; 2012; 22(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 22383324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone defects using Burch-Schneider cage].
    Gallo J; Rozkydal Z; Sklenský M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2006 Jun; 73(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 16846560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Total hip arthroplasty revision in elderly people with cement and Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage.
    Gaiani L; Bertelli R; Palmonari M; Vicenzi G
    Chir Organi Mov; 2009 May; 93(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 19711157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Promising Mid-term Results With a Cup-cage Construct for Large Acetabular Defects and Pelvic Discontinuity.
    Amenabar T; Rahman WA; Hetaimish BM; Kuzyk PR; Safir OA; Gross AE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):408-14. PubMed ID: 25712864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The midterm and long-term effects of acetabular roof ring and Burch-Schneider anti-protusio cages in acetabular revisions for patients with acetabular bone deficiency.
    Demir MT; Pirinççi Y; Salih M; Erdoğan F; Güney N
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2015; 49(6):597-605. PubMed ID: 26511685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The modern Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage for the treatment of acetabular defects: is it still an option? A systematic review.
    Malahias MA; Sarantis M; Gkiatas I; Jang SJ; Gu A; Thorey F; Alexiades MM; Nikolaou VS
    Hip Int; 2023 Jul; 33(4):705-715. PubMed ID: 35658595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Müller acetabular reinforcement ring--still an option in acetabular revision of Paprosky 2 defects? Longterm results after 10 years.
    Kösters C; Schliemann B; Decking D; Simon U; Zurstegge M; Decking J
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2015 Jun; 81(2):257-63. PubMed ID: 26280965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of the Burch-Schneider cage and structural allografts in complex acetabular deficiency: 3- to 10-year follow up.
    Hsu CC; Hsu CH; Yen SH; Wang JW
    Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2015 Oct; 31(10):540-7. PubMed ID: 26520694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The medium term outcome of the Omnifit constrained acetabular cup.
    Bigsby E; Whitehouse MR; Bannister GC; Blom AW
    Hip Int; 2012; 22(5):505-10. PubMed ID: 23100150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acetabular reconstruction with the Burch-Schneider ring: an EBRA analysis of 40 cup revisions.
    Ilchmann T; Gelzer JP; Winter E; Weise K
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Feb; 77(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 16534705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revision of type III and type IVB acetabular defects with Burch-Schneider anti-Protrusio cages.
    Ilyas I; Alrumaih HA; Kashif S; Rabbani SA; Faqihi AH
    J Arthroplasty; 2015 Feb; 30(2):259-64. PubMed ID: 25280395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical and radiological outcomes of acetabular revision with the Delta Revision TT cup.
    Munegato D; Bigoni M; Sotiri R; Bruschetta A; Omeljaniuk RJ; Turati M; Andrea R; Zatti G
    Hip Int; 2018 Nov; 28(2_suppl):54-60. PubMed ID: 30755123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Evolution of the Cup-Cage Technique for Major Acetabular Defects: Full and Half Cup-Cage Reconstruction.
    Sculco PK; Ledford CK; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Jul; 99(13):1104-1110. PubMed ID: 28678123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcome and EBRA migration analysis of a reconstruction cage in acetabular revision arthroplasty: a clinical and radiological study.
    Dammerer D; Blum P; Putzer D; van Beeck A; Nogler M; Thaler M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2021 Mar; 141(3):509-516. PubMed ID: 33354743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Major acetabular defects treated with the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusion cage and impaction bone allograft in a large series: a 5- to 7- year follow-up study.
    Marx A; Beier A; Richter A; Lohmann CH; Halder AM
    Hip Int; 2016 Nov; 26(6):585-590. PubMed ID: 27646509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcome of porous tantalum acetabular components for Paprosky type 3 and 4 acetabular defects.
    Batuyong ED; Brock HS; Thiruvengadam N; Maloney WJ; Goodman SB; Huddleston JI
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1318-22. PubMed ID: 24405625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. LUMiC
    Bus MP; Szafranski A; Sellevold S; Goryn T; Jutte PC; Bramer JA; Fiocco M; Streitbürger A; Kotrych D; van de Sande MA; Dijkstra PD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):686-695. PubMed ID: 27020434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bone defect determines acetabular revision surgery.
    García-Cimbrelo E; García-Rey E
    Hip Int; 2014 Oct; 24 Suppl 10():S33-6. PubMed ID: 24970036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Limits in cementless hip revision total hip arthroplasty. Midterm experience with an oblong revision cup].
    Götze C; Sippel C; Wendt G; Steinbeck J
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 12695955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of cementless acetabular component with a hook and iliac flanges in revision arthroplasty for massive acetabular defect.
    Kim KC; Ha YC; Kang BJ; Lee YK; Ji HM; Koo KH
    J Orthop Sci; 2012 Jan; 17(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 22094605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.