These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

476 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22384016)

  • 1. Assessment of metagenomic assembly using simulated next generation sequencing data.
    Mende DR; Waller AS; Sunagawa S; Järvelin AI; Chan MM; Arumugam M; Raes J; Bork P
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e31386. PubMed ID: 22384016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of short read metagenomic assembly.
    Charuvaka A; Rangwala H
    BMC Genomics; 2011; 12 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S8. PubMed ID: 21989307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved assemblies using a source-agnostic pipeline for MetaGenomic Assembly by Merging (MeGAMerge) of contigs.
    Scholz M; Lo CC; Chain PS
    Sci Rep; 2014 Oct; 4():6480. PubMed ID: 25270300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MinION™ nanopore sequencing of environmental metagenomes: a synthetic approach.
    Brown BL; Watson M; Minot SS; Rivera MC; Franklin RB
    Gigascience; 2017 Mar; 6(3):1-10. PubMed ID: 28327976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of different assembly and annotation tools on analysis of simulated viral metagenomic communities in the gut.
    Vázquez-Castellanos JF; García-López R; Pérez-Brocal V; Pignatelli M; Moya A
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jan; 15():37. PubMed ID: 24438450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comprehensive investigation of metagenome assembly by linked-read sequencing.
    Zhang L; Fang X; Liao H; Zhang Z; Zhou X; Han L; Chen Y; Qiu Q; Li SC
    Microbiome; 2020 Nov; 8(1):156. PubMed ID: 33176883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metagenomic Assembly: Reconstructing Genomes from Metagenomes.
    Wang Z; Liang JL; Huang LN; Mengoni A; Shu WS
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2242():139-152. PubMed ID: 33961222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of metagenomic assemblers based on hybrid reads of real and simulated metagenomic sequences.
    Wang Z; Wang Y; Fuhrman JA; Sun F; Zhu S
    Brief Bioinform; 2020 May; 21(3):777-790. PubMed ID: 30860572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fragmentation and Coverage Variation in Viral Metagenome Assemblies, and Their Effect in Diversity Calculations.
    García-López R; Vázquez-Castellanos JF; Moya A
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2015; 3():141. PubMed ID: 26442255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Subset selection of high-depth next generation sequencing reads for de novo genome assembly using MapReduce framework.
    Fang CH; Chang YJ; Chung WC; Hsieh PH; Lin CY; Ho JM
    BMC Genomics; 2015; 16 Suppl 12(Suppl 12):S9. PubMed ID: 26678408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. METAMVGL: a multi-view graph-based metagenomic contig binning algorithm by integrating assembly and paired-end graphs.
    Zhang Z; Zhang L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Jul; 22(Suppl 10):378. PubMed ID: 34294039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of viral genome assembly and diversity estimation in deep metagenomes.
    Aguirre de Cárcer D; Angly FE; Alcamí A
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Nov; 15(1):989. PubMed ID: 25407630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of simulated data sets to evaluate the fidelity of metagenomic processing methods.
    Mavromatis K; Ivanova N; Barry K; Shapiro H; Goltsman E; McHardy AC; Rigoutsos I; Salamov A; Korzeniewski F; Land M; Lapidus A; Grigoriev I; Richardson P; Hugenholtz P; Kyrpides NC
    Nat Methods; 2007 Jun; 4(6):495-500. PubMed ID: 17468765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct comparisons of Illumina vs. Roche 454 sequencing technologies on the same microbial community DNA sample.
    Luo C; Tsementzi D; Kyrpides N; Read T; Konstantinidis KT
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e30087. PubMed ID: 22347999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benchmarking genome assembly methods on metagenomic sequencing data.
    Zhang Z; Yang C; Veldsman WP; Fang X; Zhang L
    Brief Bioinform; 2023 Mar; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 36917471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High quality draft sequences for prokaryotic genomes using a mix of new sequencing technologies.
    Aury JM; Cruaud C; Barbe V; Rogier O; Mangenot S; Samson G; Poulain J; Anthouard V; Scarpelli C; Artiguenave F; Wincker P
    BMC Genomics; 2008 Dec; 9():603. PubMed ID: 19087275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Metagenomic assembly through the lens of validation: recent advances in assessing and improving the quality of genomes assembled from metagenomes.
    Olson ND; Treangen TJ; Hill CM; Cepeda-Espinoza V; Ghurye J; Koren S; Pop M
    Brief Bioinform; 2019 Jul; 20(4):1140-1150. PubMed ID: 28968737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved metagenome assemblies and taxonomic binning using long-read circular consensus sequence data.
    Frank JA; Pan Y; Tooming-Klunderud A; Eijsink VGH; McHardy AC; Nederbragt AJ; Pope PB
    Sci Rep; 2016 May; 6():25373. PubMed ID: 27156482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sequence assembly using next generation sequencing data--challenges and solutions.
    Chin FY; Leung HC; Yiu SM
    Sci China Life Sci; 2014 Nov; 57(11):1140-8. PubMed ID: 25326069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. BIGMAC : breaking inaccurate genomes and merging assembled contigs for long read metagenomic assembly.
    Lam KK; Hall R; Clum A; Rao S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):435. PubMed ID: 27793084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.