318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22384018)
1. Evaluating characteristics of de novo assembly software on 454 transcriptome data: a simulation approach.
Mundry M; Bornberg-Bauer E; Sammeth M; Feulner PG
PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e31410. PubMed ID: 22384018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing de novo assemblers for 454 transcriptome data.
Kumar S; Blaxter ML
BMC Genomics; 2010 Oct; 11():571. PubMed ID: 20950480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. De novo transcriptome assembly for a non-model species, the blood-sucking bug Triatoma brasiliensis, a vector of Chagas disease.
Marchant A; Mougel F; Almeida C; Jacquin-Joly E; Costa J; Harry M
Genetica; 2015 Apr; 143(2):225-39. PubMed ID: 25233990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short read Illumina data for the de novo assembly of a non-model snail species transcriptome (Radix balthica, Basommatophora, Pulmonata), and a comparison of assembler performance.
Feldmeyer B; Wheat CW; Krezdorn N; Rotter B; Pfenninger M
BMC Genomics; 2011 Jun; 12():317. PubMed ID: 21679424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Challenges and advances for transcriptome assembly in non-model species.
Ungaro A; Pech N; Martin JF; McCairns RJS; Mévy JP; Chappaz R; Gilles A
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0185020. PubMed ID: 28931057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of De Novo Transcriptome Assemblers and k-mer Strategies Using the Killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus.
Rana SB; Zadlock FJ; Zhang Z; Murphy WR; Bentivegna CS
PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153104. PubMed ID: 27054874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative performance of transcriptome assembly methods for non-model organisms.
Huang X; Chen XG; Armbruster PA
BMC Genomics; 2016 Jul; 17():523. PubMed ID: 27464550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of different assembly and annotation tools on analysis of simulated viral metagenomic communities in the gut.
Vázquez-Castellanos JF; García-López R; Pérez-Brocal V; Pignatelli M; Moya A
BMC Genomics; 2014 Jan; 15():37. PubMed ID: 24438450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assembly and annotation of a non-model gastropod (Nerita melanotragus) transcriptome: a comparison of de novo assemblers.
Amin S; Prentis PJ; Gilding EK; Pavasovic A
BMC Res Notes; 2014 Aug; 7():488. PubMed ID: 25084827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of short read metagenomic assembly.
Charuvaka A; Rangwala H
BMC Genomics; 2011; 12 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S8. PubMed ID: 21989307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identifying wrong assemblies in de novo short read primary sequence assembly contigs.
Chawla V; Kumar R; Shankar R
J Biosci; 2016 Sep; 41(3):455-74. PubMed ID: 27581937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CAP3: A DNA sequence assembly program.
Huang X; Madan A
Genome Res; 1999 Sep; 9(9):868-77. PubMed ID: 10508846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of short read quality and quantity on a de novo vertebrate transcriptome assembly.
Garcia TI; Shen Y; Catchen J; Amores A; Schartl M; Postlethwait J; Walter RB
Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol; 2012 Jan; 155(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 21651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimization of de novo transcriptome assembly from high-throughput short read sequencing data improves functional annotation for non-model organisms.
Haznedaroglu BZ; Reeves D; Rismani-Yazdi H; Peccia J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jul; 13():170. PubMed ID: 22808927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. TransFlow: a modular framework for assembling and assessing accurate de novo transcriptomes in non-model organisms.
Seoane P; Espigares M; Carmona R; Polonio Á; Quintana J; Cretazzo E; Bota J; Pérez-García A; Dios Alché J; Gómez L; Claros MG
BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Nov; 19(Suppl 14):416. PubMed ID: 30453874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. iAssembler: a package for de novo assembly of Roche-454/Sanger transcriptome sequences.
Zheng Y; Zhao L; Gao J; Fei Z
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Nov; 12():453. PubMed ID: 22111509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Compacta: a fast contig clustering tool for de novo assembled transcriptomes.
Razo-Mendivil FG; Martínez O; Hayano-Kanashiro C
BMC Genomics; 2020 Feb; 21(1):148. PubMed ID: 32046653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative analysis of de novo transcriptome assembly.
Clarke K; Yang Y; Marsh R; Xie L; Zhang KK
Sci China Life Sci; 2013 Feb; 56(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 23393031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Critical assessment of assembly strategies for non-model species mRNA-Seq data and application of next-generation sequencing to the comparison of C(3) and C(4) species.
Bräutigam A; Mullick T; Schliesky S; Weber AP
J Exp Bot; 2011 May; 62(9):3093-102. PubMed ID: 21398430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. LR_Gapcloser: a tiling path-based gap closer that uses long reads to complete genome assembly.
Xu GC; Xu TJ; Zhu R; Zhang Y; Li SQ; Wang HW; Li JT
Gigascience; 2019 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 30576505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
