These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22384069)

  • 1. Time in a bottle: the evolutionary fate of species discrimination in sibling Drosophila species.
    Myers EM; Frankino WA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e31759. PubMed ID: 22384069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Asymmetrical patterns of speciation uniquely support reinforcement in Drosophila.
    Yukilevich R
    Evolution; 2012 May; 66(5):1430-46. PubMed ID: 22519782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Postmating-prezygotic isolation is not an important source of selection for reinforcement within and between species in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Lorch PD; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2005 May; 59(5):1039-45. PubMed ID: 16136803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reinforcement shapes clines in female mate discrimination in Drosophila subquinaria.
    Bewick ER; Dyer KA
    Evolution; 2014 Nov; 68(11):3082-94. PubMed ID: 25163510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Asymmetrical reinforcement and Wolbachia infection in Drosophila.
    Jaenike J; Dyer KA; Cornish C; Minhas MS
    PLoS Biol; 2006 Oct; 4(10):e325. PubMed ID: 17032063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the Coyne and Orr-igin of species: effects of intrinsic postzygotic isolation, ecological differentiation, x chromosome size, and sympatry on Drosophila speciation.
    Turelli M; Lipkowitz JR; Brandvain Y
    Evolution; 2014 Apr; 68(4):1176-87. PubMed ID: 24325145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reinforcement of gametic isolation in Drosophila.
    Matute DR
    PLoS Biol; 2010 Mar; 8(3):e1000341. PubMed ID: 20351771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. REINFORCEMENT OF STICKLEBACK MATE PREFERENCES: SYMPATRY BREEDS CONTEMPT.
    Rundle HD; Schluter D
    Evolution; 1998 Feb; 52(1):200-208. PubMed ID: 28568163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of prezygotic isolation mechanisms in the divergence of two parasite species.
    Henrich T; Kalbe M
    BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):245. PubMed ID: 27829374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reproductive character displacement of epicuticular compounds and their contribution to mate choice in Drosophila subquinaria and Drosophila recens.
    Dyer KA; White BE; Sztepanacz JL; Bewick ER; Rundle HD
    Evolution; 2014 Apr; 68(4):1163-75. PubMed ID: 24351014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing potential mechanisms of conspecific sperm precedence in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Peckenpaugh B; Castillo DM; Moyle LC
    J Evol Biol; 2021 Dec; 34(12):1970-1980. PubMed ID: 34653290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reproductive character displacement of female mate preferences for male cuticular hydrocarbons in Drosophila subquinaria.
    Rundle HD; Dyer KA
    Evolution; 2015 Oct; 69(10):2625-37. PubMed ID: 26299584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The evolution of male and female mating preferences in Drosophila speciation.
    Yukilevich R; Peterson EK
    Evolution; 2019 Sep; 73(9):1759-1773. PubMed ID: 31077339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reinforcement can overcome gene flow during speciation in Drosophila.
    Matute DR
    Curr Biol; 2010 Dec; 20(24):2229-33. PubMed ID: 21129972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A test of the chromosomal rearrangement model of speciation in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Brown KM; Burk LM; Henagan LM; Noor MA
    Evolution; 2004 Aug; 58(8):1856-60. PubMed ID: 15446438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Geographic contrasts between pre- and postzygotic barriers are consistent with reinforcement in Heliconius butterflies.
    Rosser N; Queste LM; Cama B; Edelman NB; Mann F; Mori Pezo R; Morris J; Segami C; Velado P; Schulz S; Mallet JLB; Dasmahapatra KK
    Evolution; 2019 Sep; 73(9):1821-1838. PubMed ID: 31334832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sympatry, allopatry and sexual isolation between Drosophila mojavensis and D. arizonae.
    Massie KR; Markow TA
    Hereditas; 2005 Feb; 142(2005):51-5. PubMed ID: 16970612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental evidence for asymmetric mate preference and aggression: behavioral interactions in a woodrat (Neotoma) hybrid zone.
    Shurtliff QR; Murphy PJ; Yeiter JD; Matocq MD
    BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Oct; 13():220. PubMed ID: 24093823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A biogeographic genetic approach for testing the role of reinforcement: the case of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.
    Kulathinal RJ; Singh RS
    Evolution; 2000 Feb; 54(1):210-7. PubMed ID: 10937197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strength of sexual and postmating prezygotic barriers varies between sympatric populations with different histories and species abundances.
    Poikela N; Kinnunen J; Wurdack M; Kauranen H; Schmitt T; Kankare M; Snook RR; Hoikkala A
    Evolution; 2019 Jun; 73(6):1182-1199. PubMed ID: 30957216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.