These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22384129)
1. Psychometric properties of the Danish Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire: the SDQ assessed for more than 70,000 raters in four different cohorts. Niclasen J; Teasdale TW; Andersen AM; Skovgaard AM; Elberling H; Obel C PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e32025. PubMed ID: 22384129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A confirmatory approach to examining the factor structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): a large scale cohort study. Niclasen J; Skovgaard AM; Andersen AM; Sømhovd MJ; Obel C J Abnorm Child Psychol; 2013 Apr; 41(3):355-65. PubMed ID: 23008011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Normative Data of the Self-Report Version of the German Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in an Epidemiological Setting. Becker A; Wang B; Kunze B; Otto C; Schlack R; Hölling H; Ravens-Sieberer U; Klasen F; Rogge J; Isensee C; Rothenberger A; Bella Study Group T Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother; 2018 Nov; 46(6):523-533. PubMed ID: 29846123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dutch norms for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) - parent form for children aged 2-18 years. Maurice-Stam H; Haverman L; Splinter A; van Oers HA; Schepers SA; Grootenhuis MA Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Jun; 16(1):123. PubMed ID: 29898729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher forms of the Japanese version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Shibata Y; Okada K; Fukumoto R; Nomura K Brain Dev; 2015 May; 37(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 25172302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Agreement between mothers', fathers', and teachers' ratings of behavioural and emotional problems in 3-5-year-old children. Fält E; Wallby T; Sarkadi A; Salari R; Fabian H PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206752. PubMed ID: 30383861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity and reliability of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in 5-6 year olds: differences by gender or by parental education? Mieloo C; Raat H; van Oort F; Bevaart F; Vogel I; Donker M; Jansen W PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e36805. PubMed ID: 22629332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychometric properties of the parent strengths and difficulties questionnaire in the general population of German children and adolescents: results of the BELLA study. Rothenberger A; Becker A; Erhart M; Wille N; Ravens-Sieberer U; Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2008 Dec; 17 Suppl 1():99-105. PubMed ID: 19132309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Further examination of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Magy) in a community sample of young adolescents]. Turi E; Tóth I; Gervai J Psychiatr Hung; 2011; 26(6):415-26. PubMed ID: 22354700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for preschool children-a Swedish validation. Gustafsson BM; Gustafsson PA; Proczkowska-Björklund M Nord J Psychiatry; 2016 Nov; 70(8):567-74. PubMed ID: 27241951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Emotional and behavioural problems in Swedish preschool children rated by preschool teachers with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Gustafsson BM; Proczkowska-Björklund M; Gustafsson PA BMC Pediatr; 2017 Apr; 17(1):110. PubMed ID: 28431506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Danish norms for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Arnfred J; Svendsen K; Rask C; Jeppesen P; Fensbo L; Houmann T; Obel C; Niclasen J; Bilenberg N Dan Med J; 2019 Jun; 66(6):. PubMed ID: 31256773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Differential Stability and Interrater-Dependencies in the Assessment of Psychopathological Symptoms: Longitudinal Analyses Based on the SDQ in Children with and without Specific Learning Disabilities]. Brandenburg J; Hartmann D; Visser L; Schwenck C; Hasselhorn M Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 2021 May; 70(4):282-297. PubMed ID: 33977880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Parent Ratings of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: What Is the Optimum Factor Model? Gomez R; Stavropoulos V Assessment; 2019 Sep; 26(6):1142-1153. PubMed ID: 28735555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire among Finnish school-aged children and adolescents. Koskelainen M; Sourander A; Kaljonen A Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2000 Dec; 9(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 11202103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of a bifactor model of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Caci H; Morin AJ; Tran A Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2015 Oct; 24(10):1291-301. PubMed ID: 25631690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of the parent and teacher SDQ in a clinical sample. Becker A; Woerner W; Hasselhorn M; Banaschewski T; Rothenberger A Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2004; 13 Suppl 2():II11-6. PubMed ID: 15243781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Australian data and psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. Hawes DJ; Dadds MR Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2004 Aug; 38(8):644-51. PubMed ID: 15298588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the psychometric properties of the parent-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a nationally representative sample of Canadian children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 years. Hoffmann MD; Lang JJ; Guerrero MD; Cameron JD; Goldfield GS; Orpana HM; de Groh M Health Rep; 2020 Aug; 31(8):13-20. PubMed ID: 32816414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Self-Report: A Valid Instrument for the Identification of Emotional and Behavioral Problems. Theunissen MHC; de Wolff MS; Reijneveld SA Acad Pediatr; 2019; 19(4):471-476. PubMed ID: 30639760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]