156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22384325)
1. Quantitative genetics of genomic imprinting: a comparison of simple variance derivations, the effects of inbreeding, and response to selection.
Santure AW; Spencer HG
G3 (Bethesda); 2011 Jul; 1(2):131-42. PubMed ID: 22384325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of mom and dad: quantitative genetic models for maternal effects and genomic imprinting.
Santure AW; Spencer HG
Genetics; 2006 Aug; 173(4):2297-316. PubMed ID: 16751674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An exact form of the breeder's equation for the evolution of a quantitative trait under natural selection.
Heywood JS
Evolution; 2005 Nov; 59(11):2287-98. PubMed ID: 16396170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of genomic imprinting on quantitative traits.
Spencer HG
Genetica; 2009 Jun; 136(2):285-93. PubMed ID: 18690543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dissecting total genetic variance into additive and dominance components of purebred and crossbred pig traits.
Tusell L; Gilbert H; Vitezica ZG; Mercat MJ; Legarra A; Larzul C
Animal; 2019 Nov; 13(11):2429-2439. PubMed ID: 31120005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. EVOLUTIONARY PREDICTABILITY IN NATURAL POPULATIONS: DO MATING SYSTEM AND NONADDITIVE GENETIC VARIANCE INTERACT TO AFFECT HERITABILITIES IN PLANTAGO LANCEOLATA?
Tonsor SJ; Goodnight CJ
Evolution; 1997 Dec; 51(6):1773-1784. PubMed ID: 28565103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genomic dissection of maternal, additive and non-additive genetic effects for growth and carcass traits in Nile tilapia.
Joshi R; Meuwissen THE; Woolliams JA; Gjøen HM
Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Jan; 52(1):1. PubMed ID: 31941436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pedigree-based estimation of covariance between dominance deviations and additive genetic effects in closed rabbit lines considering inbreeding and using a computationally simpler equivalent model.
Fernández EN; Legarra A; Martínez R; Sánchez JP; Baselga M
J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Jun; 134(3):184-195. PubMed ID: 28508486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The correlation between relatives on the supposition of genomic imprinting.
Spencer HG
Genetics; 2002 May; 161(1):411-7. PubMed ID: 12019254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evolutionary Quantitative Genetics of Genomic Imprinting.
O'Brien EK; Wolf JB
Genetics; 2019 Jan; 211(1):75-88. PubMed ID: 30389806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetic evaluation methods for populations with dominance and inbreeding.
de Boer IJ; Hoeschele I
Theor Appl Genet; 1993 Apr; 86(2-3):245-58. PubMed ID: 24193467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative genetics model as the unifying model for defining genomic relationship and inbreeding coefficient.
Wang C; Da Y
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114484. PubMed ID: 25517971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gametic gene flow method accounts for genomic imprinting.
Börner V; Reinsch N
J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Jun; 127(3):215-29. PubMed ID: 20536639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Price equation as a bridge between animal breeding and evolutionary biology.
Bijma P
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2020 Apr; 375(1797):20190360. PubMed ID: 32146890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The contribution of dominance to the understanding of quantitative genetic variation.
Wellmann R; Bennewitz J
Genet Res (Camb); 2011 Apr; 93(2):139-54. PubMed ID: 21481291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Significance of linkage disequilibrium and epistasis on genetic variances in noninbred and inbred populations.
Viana JMS; Garcia AAF
BMC Genomics; 2022 Apr; 23(1):286. PubMed ID: 35397494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Direct and indirect genetic and fine-scale location effects on breeding date in song sparrows.
Germain RR; Wolak ME; Arcese P; Losdat S; Reid JM
J Anim Ecol; 2016 Nov; 85(6):1613-1624. PubMed ID: 27448623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative analysis of parent-of-origin effect in reproductive and morphological selection criteria in the Pura Raza Española horse.
Perdomo-González DI; Varona L; Molina A; Laseca N; Valera M
J Anim Breed Genet; 2023 Nov; 140(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 37287409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dominance and epistatic genetic variances for litter size in pigs using genomic models.
Vitezica ZG; Reverter A; Herring W; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):71. PubMed ID: 30577727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genomic evaluation by including dominance effects and inbreeding depression for purebred and crossbred performance with an application in pigs.
Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Nov; 48(1):92. PubMed ID: 27887565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
