These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

495 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22385213)

  • 1. Automated Retinal Imaging System (ARIS) compared with ETDRS protocol color stereoscopic retinal photography to assess level of diabetic retinopathy.
    Maker MP; Noble J; Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Murtha TJ; Sun JK; Aiello LM; Bursell SE; Aiello LP
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Jun; 14(6):515-22. PubMed ID: 22385213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonmydriatic ultrawide field retinal imaging compared with dilated standard 7-field 35-mm photography and retinal specialist examination for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy.
    Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Noble J; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 154(3):549-559.e2. PubMed ID: 22626617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stereo nonmydriatic digital-video color retinal imaging compared with Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study seven standard field 35-mm stereo color photos for determining level of diabetic retinopathy.
    Bursell SE; Cavallerano JD; Cavallerano AA; Clermont AC; Birkmire-Peters D; Aiello LP; Aiello LM;
    Ophthalmology; 2001 Mar; 108(3):572-85. PubMed ID: 11237913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hemorrhage and/or Microaneurysm Severity and Count in Ultrawide Field Images and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Photography.
    Silva PS; El-Rami H; Barham R; Gupta A; Fleming A; van Hemert J; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Aiello LP
    Ophthalmology; 2017 Jul; 124(7):970-976. PubMed ID: 28336057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
    Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. One-field, two-field and five-field handheld retinal imaging compared with standard seven-field Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study photography for diabetic retinopathy screening.
    Salongcay RP; Jacoba CMP; Salva CMG; Rageh A; Aquino LAC; Saunar AV; Alog GP; Ashraf M; Peto T; Silva PS
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2024 May; 108(5):735-741. PubMed ID: 37094836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peripheral lesions identified by mydriatic ultrawide field imaging: distribution and potential impact on diabetic retinopathy severity.
    Silva PS; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Soliman AZ; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Dec; 120(12):2587-2595. PubMed ID: 23778092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of low-light nonmydriatic digital imaging with 35-mm ETDRS seven-standard field stereo color fundus photographs and clinical examination.
    Silva PS; Walia S; Cavallerano JD; Sun JK; Dunn C; Bursell SE; Aiello LM; Aiello LP
    Telemed J E Health; 2012 Sep; 18(7):492-9. PubMed ID: 22827402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison between Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study 7-field retinal photos and non-mydriatic, mydriatic and mydriatic steered widefield scanning laser ophthalmoscopy for assessment of diabetic retinopathy.
    Rasmussen ML; Broe R; Frydkjaer-Olsen U; Olsen BS; Mortensen HB; Peto T; Grauslund J
    J Diabetes Complications; 2015; 29(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 25240716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of a digital retinal imaging system and seven-field stereo color fundus photography to detect diabetic retinopathy in the primary care environment.
    Schiffman RM; Jacobsen G; Nussbaum JJ; Desai UR; Carey JD; Glasser D; Zimmer-Galler IE; Zeimer R; Goldberg MF
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 15688971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonmydriatic digital imaging alternative for annual retinal examination in persons with previously documented no or mild diabetic retinopathy.
    Cavallerano JD; Aiello LP; Cavallerano AA; Katalinic P; Hock K; Kirby R; Aiello LM;
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Oct; 140(4):667-73. PubMed ID: 16083842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Standard 7-Field Imaging With Ultrawide-Field Imaging for Determining Severity of Diabetic Retinopathy.
    Aiello LP; Odia I; Glassman AR; Melia M; Jampol LM; Bressler NM; Kiss S; Silva PS; Wykoff CC; Sun JK;
    JAMA Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan; 137(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 30347105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging versus dilated ophthalmic examination for nondiabetic eye disease in persons with diabetes.
    Chow SP; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Katalinic P; Hock K; Tolson A; Kirby R; Bursell SE; Aiello LP
    Ophthalmology; 2006 May; 113(5):833-40. PubMed ID: 16650680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: 1 and 3 nonmydriatic 45-degree digital fundus photographs vs 7 standard early treatment diabetic retinopathy study fields.
    Vujosevic S; Benetti E; Massignan F; Pilotto E; Varano M; Cavarzeran F; Avogaro A; Midena E
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jul; 148(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 19406376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparability of digital photography with the ETDRS film protocol for evaluation of diabetic retinopathy severity.
    Li HK; Danis RP; Hubbard LD; Florez-Arango JF; Esquivel A; Krupinski EA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jul; 52(7):4717-25. PubMed ID: 21345979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monoscopic versus stereoscopic retinal photography for grading diabetic retinopathy severity.
    Li HK; Hubbard LD; Danis RP; Esquivel A; Florez-Arango JF; Krupinski EA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jun; 51(6):3184-92. PubMed ID: 20053978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Handheld Retinal Imaging with ETDRS 7-Standard Field Photography for Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema.
    Salongcay RP; Aquino LAC; Salva CMG; Saunar AV; Alog GP; Sun JK; Peto T; Silva PS
    Ophthalmol Retina; 2022 Jul; 6(7):548-556. PubMed ID: 35278726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy and reliability of retinal photo grading for diabetic retinopathy: Remote graders from a developing country and standard retinal photo grader in Australia.
    Islam FMA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179310. PubMed ID: 28632764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness and safety of screening for diabetic retinopathy with two nonmydriatic digital images compared with the seven standard stereoscopic photographic fields.
    Boucher MC; Gresset JA; Angioi K; Olivier S
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2003 Dec; 38(7):557-68. PubMed ID: 14740797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of diabetic retinopathy using two ultra-wide-field fundus imaging systems, the Clarus® and Optos™ systems.
    Hirano T; Imai A; Kasamatsu H; Kakihara S; Toriyama Y; Murata T
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):332. PubMed ID: 30572870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.