BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

651 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22386392)

  • 1. Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes.
    Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
    Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):532-6. PubMed ID: 22386392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pelvic floor function before and after robotic sacrocolpopexy: one-year outcomes.
    Geller EJ; Parnell BA; Dunivan GC
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):322-7. PubMed ID: 21458389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy on symptoms, health-related quality of life and sexuality: a medium-term analysis.
    Thibault F; Costa P; Thanigasalam R; Seni G; Brouzyine M; Cayzergues L; De Tayrac R; Droupy S; Wagner L
    BJU Int; 2013 Dec; 112(8):1143-9. PubMed ID: 24007194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Siddiqui NY; Geller EJ; Visco AG
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 206(5):435.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22397900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responsiveness of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) in women undergoing vaginal surgery and pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Barber MD; Walters MD; Cundiff GW;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 May; 194(5):1492-8. PubMed ID: 16647933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic abdominal sacrocolpopexy/sacrouteropexy repair of advanced female pelvic organ prolaspe (POP): utilizing POP-quantification-based staging and outcomes.
    Daneshgari F; Kefer JC; Moore C; Kaouk J
    BJU Int; 2007 Oct; 100(4):875-9. PubMed ID: 17822467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mid-term outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with anterior and posterior polyester mesh for treatment of genito-urinary prolapse.
    Sergent F; Resch B; Loisel C; Bisson V; Schaal JP; Marpeau L
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Jun; 156(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 21353736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Comparison outcomes of three surgical procedures in treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse and analysis of risk factors for genital prolapse recurrence].
    Hu CD; Chen YS; Yi XF; Ding JX; Feng WW; Yao LQ; Huang J; Zhang Y; Hu WG; Zhu ZL; Hua KQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21426765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic approaches to prolapse surgery.
    Rosenblum N
    Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jul; 22(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 22647648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laparoscopic extraperitoneal uterine suspension to anterior abdominal wall bilaterally using synthetic mesh to treat uterovaginal prolapse.
    Chen G; Ling B; Li J; Xu P; Hu W; Zhao W; Wu D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(5):631-6. PubMed ID: 20598651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders.
    Barber MD; Kuchibhatla MN; Pieper CF; Bump RC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 185(6):1388-95. PubMed ID: 11744914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Anatomic and functional results after surgical treatment of uro genital prolapse: prospective study about 93 cases].
    Mathlouthi N; Elloumi J; Trabelsi H; Ben Ali I; Dhouib M; Chaabene K; Amouri H; Ben Ayed B; Guermazi M
    Tunis Med; 2011 Dec; 89(12):896-901. PubMed ID: 22198889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for management of pelvic organ prolapse enhances quality of life at one year: a prospective observational study.
    Perez T; Crochet P; Descargues G; Tribondeau P; Soffray F; Gadonneix P; Loundou A; Baumstarck-Barrau K
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(6):747-54. PubMed ID: 22024261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Midterm prospective comparison of vaginal repair with mesh vs Prolift system devices for prolapse.
    Chen YS; Cao Q; Ding JX; Hu CD; Feng WW; Hua KQ
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Oct; 164(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 22771224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Impact of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy on symptoms, health-related quality of life and sexuality: A 3-year prospective study].
    Chevrot A; Droupy S; Linares E; de Tayrac R; Costa P; Wagner L
    Prog Urol; 2016 Sep; 26(10):558-65. PubMed ID: 27052819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long-term quality-of-life outcome after mesh sacrocolpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse.
    Thomas AZ; Giri SK; Cox AM; Creagh T
    BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1676-9. PubMed ID: 19522867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Study on mesh-augmented vaginal reconstructive surgery in treatment of pelvic organ prolapse].
    Han JS; Zhang K; Zhu FL; Yao Y; Liang HM; Zhou LF; Guo HY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 46(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 21426766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Impact of vaginal mesh exposure on quality of life in patients undergoing transvaginal reconstructive pelvic surgery with polypropylene mesh].
    Zhang YH; Lu YX; Liu X; Shen WJ; Liu JX
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Aug; 47(8):608-11. PubMed ID: 23141182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7).
    Barber MD; Walters MD; Bump RC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jul; 193(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 16021067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.