These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
8. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Kumar A; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Mouraviev V; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27435701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retrograde versus antegrade nerve sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better for achieving early functional recovery? Ko YH; Coelho RF; Sivaraman A; Schatloff O; Chauhan S; Abdul-Muhsin HM; Carrion RJ; Palmer KJ; Cheon J; Patel VR Eur Urol; 2013 Jan; 63(1):169-77. PubMed ID: 23092543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preserved postoperative penile size correlates well with maintained erectile function after bilateral nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Briganti A; Fabbri F; Salonia A; Gallina A; Chun FK; Dehò F; Zanni G; Suardi N; Karakiewicz PI; Rigatti P; Montorsi F Eur Urol; 2007 Sep; 52(3):702-7. PubMed ID: 17418936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dissociation of sexual function and sexual bother following autologous sural nerve grafting during radical prostatectomy. Kuwata Y; Muneuchi G; Igawa HH; Tsukuda F; Inui M; Kakehi Y Int J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):510-4. PubMed ID: 17593095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is residual neurovascular tissue on prostatectomy specimens associated with surgeon intent at nerve-sparing and postoperative quality of life measures? Bradford TJ; Weizer AZ; Gilbert SM; Dunn RL; Wojno K; Shah R; Wood DP Urol Oncol; 2010; 28(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 19110450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nocturnal tumescence: a parameter for postoperative erectile integrity after nerve sparing radical prostatectomy. Bannowsky A; Schulze H; van der Horst C; Seif C; Braun PM; Jünemann KP J Urol; 2006 Jun; 175(6):2214-7. PubMed ID: 16697842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nerve-sparing techniques in open and laparoscopic prostatectomy. Rodriguez E; Melamud O; Ahlering TE Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2008 Mar; 8(3):475-9. PubMed ID: 18366294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic. Kim SC; Song C; Kim W; Kang T; Park J; Jeong IG; Lee S; Cho YM; Ahn H Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 21612859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Kumar A; Tandon S; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Patel VR J Robot Surg; 2016 Sep; 10(3):187-200. PubMed ID: 27251473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of outcomes between pure laparoscopic vs robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a study of comparative effectiveness based upon validated quality of life outcomes. Willis DL; Gonzalgo ML; Brotzman M; Feng Z; Trock B; Su LM BJU Int; 2012 Mar; 109(6):898-905. PubMed ID: 21933328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Functional outcomes and oncological efficacy of Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy with Veil of Aphrodite nerve-sparing: an analysis of 154 consecutive patients. Kaul S; Savera A; Badani K; Fumo M; Bhandari A; Menon M BJU Int; 2006 Mar; 97(3):467-72. PubMed ID: 16469009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cancer control and the preservation of neurovascular tissue: how to meet competing goals during robotic radical prostatectomy. Tewari A; Rao S; Martinez-Salamanca JI; Leung R; Ramanathan R; Mandhani A; Vaughan ED; Menon M; Horninger W; Tu J; Bartsch G BJU Int; 2008 Apr; 101(8):1013-8. PubMed ID: 18261153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]