132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22386424)
1. Editorial comment.
Turna B; Stein RJ
Urology; 2012 Mar; 79(3):694. PubMed ID: 22386424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Editorial comment.
Schlussel R
J Urol; 2011 Oct; 186(4 Suppl):1667. PubMed ID: 21862069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Editorial comment.
Farhat WA
J Urol; 2011 Apr; 185(4):1460. PubMed ID: 21334644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Partial ureteropelvic junction obstruction managed by robotic excision and ureteropyelostomy.
Richards KA; Singh I; Hemal AK
Can J Urol; 2009 Dec; 16(6):4932-5. PubMed ID: 20003672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Editorial Comment.
McAleer IM
Urology; 2016 Apr; 90():110. PubMed ID: 27036680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Editorial comment.
Hindley RG; Barber N
Urology; 2009 Nov; 74(5):1040; author reply 1041. PubMed ID: 19883816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic reconstruction of lower ureteral strictures.
Windsperger AP; Duchene DA
Urol Clin North Am; 2013 Aug; 40(3):363-70. PubMed ID: 23905934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robot assisted transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Jin XB; Li P; Jiang SB; Wang MW; Xia QH; Zhao Y; Xiong H; Sun P; Chen XD
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Feb; 121(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 18304474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of robotics for ureteral pelvic junction obstruction and ureteral pathology.
Leveillee RJ; Williams SK
Curr Opin Urol; 2009 Jan; 19(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 19057222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Editorial comment on: Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: effect on operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and success rate.
Novara G
Eur Urol; 2009 Nov; 56(5):857-8. PubMed ID: 19359085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotically assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Murphy D; Challacombe B; Elhage O; Khan MS; Dasgupta P
BJU Int; 2008 Jul; 102(1):136-51. PubMed ID: 18564236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Editorial comment.
Kass EJ
J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2433; discussion 2434. PubMed ID: 19765767
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Editorial comment.
Castagnetti M
J Urol; 2009 Nov; 182(5):2432-3; discussion 2434. PubMed ID: 19765750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. One-knot pyeloplasty.
Eichel L; Khonsari S; Lee DI; Basillote J; Shanberg A; Duel B; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Endourol; 2004 Apr; 18(3):201-4; discussion 204. PubMed ID: 15225380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic pyeloplasty: a critical appraisal.
Badwan K; Bhayani S
Int J Med Robot; 2007 Mar; 3():20-2. PubMed ID: 17441021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Editorial comment.
Wolf JS
Urology; 2009 Nov; 74(5):1034; author reply 1034-5. PubMed ID: 19883815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Editorial comment.
Farhat WA
J Urol; 2011 Apr; 185(4):1467; author reply 1468. PubMed ID: 21334646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot-assisted laparoscopic reconstruction of retrocaval ureter: description and video of technique.
LeRoy TJ; Thiel DD; Igel TC
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2011 May; 21(4):349-51. PubMed ID: 21486152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Laparoscopic pyeloplasty].
Komiakov BK; Guliev BG; Aliev RV
Urologiia; 2014; (1):79-83. PubMed ID: 24772780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Editorial comment.
Koh CJ
J Urol; 2013 Mar; 189(3):1086. PubMed ID: 23228521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
