212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22386723)
21. Image-guided intracavitary high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervix cancer: A single institutional experience with three-dimensional CT-based planning.
Wang B; Kwon A; Zhu Y; Yeo I; Henson CF
Brachytherapy; 2009; 8(2):240-247. PubMed ID: 19230789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Direction-modulated brachytherapy for high-dose-rate treatment of cervical cancer. I: theoretical design.
Han DY; Webster MJ; Scanderbeg DJ; Yashar C; Choi D; Song B; Devic S; Ravi A; Song WY
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Jul; 89(3):666-73. PubMed ID: 24751413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of DVH parameters and loading patterns of standard loading, manual and inverse optimization for intracavitary brachytherapy on a subset of tandem/ovoid cases.
Jamema SV; Kirisits C; Mahantshetty U; Trnkova P; Deshpande DD; Shrivastava SK; Pötter R
Radiother Oncol; 2010 Dec; 97(3):501-6. PubMed ID: 20846734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of conventional and CT-based planning for intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: target volume coverage and organs at risk doses.
Onal C; Arslan G; Topkan E; Pehlivan B; Yavuz M; Oymak E; Yavuz A
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2009 Jul; 28(1):95. PubMed ID: 19570212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided intracavitary brachytherapy for cancer of the cervix.
Zwahlen D; Jezioranski J; Chan P; Haider MA; Cho YB; Yeung I; Levin W; Manchul L; Fyles A; Milosevic M
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Jul; 74(4):1157-64. PubMed ID: 19101097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of CT-based volumetric dosimetry with traditional prescription points in the treatment of cervical cancer with PDR brachytherapy.
Lowrey N; Nilsson S; Moutrie Z; Chan P; Cheuk R
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Oct; 59(5):640-5. PubMed ID: 26223554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Dosimetric analysis of 3D image-guided HDR brachytherapy planning for the treatment of cervical cancer: is point A-based dose prescription still valid in image-guided brachytherapy?
Kim H; Beriwal S; Houser C; Huq MS
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 20488690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Image and laparoscopic guided interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced primary or recurrent gynaecological cancer using the adaptive GEC ESTRO target concept.
Fokdal L; Tanderup K; Nielsen SK; Christensen HK; Røhl L; Pedersen EM; Schønemann NK; Lindegaard JC
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Sep; 100(3):473-9. PubMed ID: 21924784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. MRI-guided 3D optimization significantly improves DVH parameters of pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer.
Lindegaard JC; Tanderup K; Nielsen SK; Haack S; Gelineck J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jul; 71(3):756-64. PubMed ID: 18191335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effects of bladder distension on organs at risk in 3D image-based planning of intracavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer.
Kim RY; Shen S; Lin HY; Spencer SA; De Los Santos J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Feb; 76(2):485-9. PubMed ID: 19467797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Exploring the potential of mixed-source brachytherapy for the treatment of cervical cancer using high-dose rate 192Ir and/or 50 kV electronic sources.
Cohen DM; Hiatt JR; O'Connor B; Curran B; Sternick ES; Wazer DE
Brachytherapy; 2011; 10(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 20889390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Should the organs at risk be contoured in vaginal cuff brachytherapy?
Holloway CL; Macklin EA; Cormack RA; Viswanathan AN
Brachytherapy; 2011; 10(4):313-7. PubMed ID: 21193355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical transition to model-based dose calculation algorithm: A retrospective analysis of high-dose-rate tandem and ring brachytherapy of the cervix.
Jacob D; Lamberto M; DeSouza Lawrence L; Mourtada F
Brachytherapy; 2017; 16(3):624-629. PubMed ID: 28365083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Additional rectal and sigmoid mucosal points and doses in high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy for carcinoma cervix: a dosimetric study.
Mahantshetty U; Tiwana MS; Jamema S; Mishra S; Engineer R; Deshpande D; Shrivastava S
J Cancer Res Ther; 2011; 7(3):298-303. PubMed ID: 22044811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. 3D inverse treatment planning for the tandem and ovoid applicator in cervical cancer.
Dewitt KD; Hsu IC; Speight J; Weinberg VK; Lessard E; Pouliot J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Nov; 63(4):1270-4. PubMed ID: 16253782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of Axxent-Xoft, (192)Ir and (60)Co high-dose-rate brachytherapy sources for image-guided brachytherapy treatment planning for cervical cancer.
Mobit PN; Packianathan S; He R; Yang CC
Br J Radiol; 2015 Aug; 88(1052):20150010. PubMed ID: 25996576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Direction modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) for treatment of cervical cancer: A planning study with
Safigholi H; Han DY; Mashouf S; Soliman A; Meigooni AS; Owrangi A; Song WY
Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6538-6547. PubMed ID: 28940520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Intercomparison of treatment concepts for MR image assisted brachytherapy of cervical carcinoma based on GYN GEC-ESTRO recommendations.
Lang S; Nulens A; Briot E; Kirisits C; De Brabandere M; Dumas I; Dimopoulos J; Petrow P; Georg D; Van Limbergen E; Haie-Meder C; Pötter R
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Feb; 78(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 16466820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cone beam CT-based three-dimensional planning in high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer.
Al-Halabi H; Portelance L; Duclos M; Reniers B; Bahoric B; Souhami L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Jul; 77(4):1092-7. PubMed ID: 19879059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Anatomy-based definition of point A utilizing three-dimensional volumetric imaging approach for high-dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy dose prescription when treating cervical cancer using limited resources.
Goyal MK; Rai DV; Kehwar TS; Manjhi J; Heintz BH; Shide KL; Barker JL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(6):69-77. PubMed ID: 27929482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
