These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2238690)

  • 1. The Wisconsin mammography quality assurance program.
    Bunge M; Zvara JA; Remington PL
    Wis Med J; 1990 Sep; 89(9):527-8. PubMed ID: 2238690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Legislative and regulatory mandates for mammography quality assurance.
    Fintor L; Alciati MH; Fischer R
    J Public Health Policy; 1995; 16(1):81-107. PubMed ID: 7738160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Assessment of mammographic units in Poland in the view of current requirements of radiation protection regulations].
    Bekas M; Pachocki KA; Rózycki Z; Wieprzowski K; Fabiszewska E
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2006; 57(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 16900867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Quality criteria and quality control in mammography].
    Friedrich M
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1985; 123():63-75. PubMed ID: 2860867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Confrontation of mammography systems in flanders with the European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in mammography screening. Analysis of initial results.
    Bosmans H; Carton AK; Deprez T; Rogge F; Van Steen A; Van Limbergen E; Marchal G
    JBR-BTR; 1999 Dec; 82(6):288-93. PubMed ID: 10670170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [As always, human quality takes precedence over equipment quality. Reflections on quality assurance of screening mammography and the ineluctable evolution towards digital systems].
    Stines J
    J Radiol; 2003 Mar; 84(3):267-8. PubMed ID: 12736584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The quality of mammography scrutinized. Ongoing control mass screenings for breast cancer is necessary].
    Andersson I; Rydén S; Karlberg I
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Aug; 92(35):3106-9. PubMed ID: 7658762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The procedures and results of a quality control program in mammography carried out on a regional basis].
    Milano F; Rosselli Del Turco M; Maggi E; Certo N; Morrone D; Lazzeri B
    Radiol Med; 1996 Mar; 91(3):187-93. PubMed ID: 8628928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Quality assurance of mammographic devices].
    Nowotny R; Semturs F
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2001; 151(21-23):556-9. PubMed ID: 11762254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammography. Part 2. Evaluation of equipment and guidelines for quality assurance.
    Zamenhof RG; Homer MJ
    Appl Radiol; 1984; 13(6):51-4. PubMed ID: 10268876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality assurance breast phantoms for screen-film mammography: design and use.
    Stanton L; Villafana T
    Appl Radiol; 1989 Nov; 18(11):41-8. PubMed ID: 10304413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mammography instrumentation: recent developments.
    Rothenberg LN
    Med Prog Technol; 1993; 19(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 8302209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose.
    Ng KH; Jamal N; DeWerd L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 121(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 16709704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Who's monitoring the quality of mammograms? The Mammography Quality Standards Act of 1992 could finally provide the answer.
    Cocca SV
    Am J Law Med; 1993; 19(3):313-44. PubMed ID: 8010307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MQSA (Mammography Quality Standards Act) update--focusing on quality assurance.
    Butler PF
    Radiol Manage; 1998; 20(4):40-50. PubMed ID: 10181471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality control in mammography. Everyone has a role. American College of Radiology.
    Haus A
    Adm Radiol; 1992 Nov; 11(11):123, 125-6, 129-30. PubMed ID: 10123210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality mammography standards--FDA. Proposed rule.
    Fed Regist; 1998 Nov; 63(214):59750-1. PubMed ID: 10187387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors affecting decreasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina after 2002: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveys.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Chung Y; Britt GG; Burns B; Cole E
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):685-91. PubMed ID: 17502258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality standards and certification requirements for mammography facilities--FDA. Interim rule with request for comments.
    Fed Regist; 1993 Dec; 58(243):67565-72. PubMed ID: 10131225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation and quality assurance of equipment in radiation oncology].
    Bull Cancer Radiother; 1996; 83 Suppl 2():242s-272s. PubMed ID: 9084494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.