113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22387401)
1. The NASS lumbar spine outcome assessment instrument: Large sample assessment and sub-scale identification.
Morlock RJ; Nerenz DR;
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil; 2002 Jan; 16(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 22387401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factor analysis of the North American Spine Society outcome assessment instrument: a study based on a spine registry of patients treated with lumbar and cervical disc arthroplasty.
Aghayev E; Elfering A; Schizas C; Mannion AF;
Spine J; 2014 Jun; 14(6):916-24. PubMed ID: 24200412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The North American Spine Society Lumbar Spine Outcome Assessment Instrument: translation and psychometric analysis of the German version in rehabilitation patients with chronic back pain].
Schochat T; Rehberg W; von Kempis J; Stucki G; Jäckel WH
Z Rheumatol; 2000 Oct; 59(5):303-13. PubMed ID: 11142925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Validation of the North American Spine Society Instrument for assessment of health status in patients with chronic backache].
Pose B; Sangha O; Peters A; Wildner M
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1999; 137(5):437-41. PubMed ID: 10549122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Maine-Seattle back questionnaire: a 12-item disability questionnaire for evaluating patients with lumbar sciatica or stenosis: results of a derivation and validation cohort analysis.
Atlas SJ; Deyo RA; van den Ancker M; Singer DE; Keller RB; Patrick DL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1869-76. PubMed ID: 12923478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measuring the outcome of health resort programs.
Weigl M; Ewert T; Kleinschmidt J; Stucki G
J Rheumatol; 2006 Apr; 33(4):764-70. PubMed ID: 16583479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the correlation and responsiveness of patient-reported pain with function and quality-of-life outcomes after spine surgery.
DeVine J; Norvell DC; Ecker E; Fourney DR; Vaccaro A; Wang J; Andersson G
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S69-74. PubMed ID: 21897347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of cervical spine surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2015 Jun; 15(6):1203-9. PubMed ID: 24076442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A critical appraisal of the North American Spine Society guidelines with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument.
Yaman ME; Gudeloglu A; Senturk S; Yaman ND; Tolunay T; Ozturk Y; Arslan AK
Spine J; 2015 Apr; 15(4):777-81. PubMed ID: 25614152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36.
Walsh TL; Hanscom B; Lurie JD; Weinstein JN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):607-15. PubMed ID: 12642770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
Willems P
Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Women fare best following surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparison of the most and least satisfied patients utilizing data from the Quality Outcomes Database.
Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Chotai S; DiGiorgio AM; Chan AY; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E3. PubMed ID: 29290130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outcome assessment in lumbar spine surgery.
Zanoli G
Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Jun; 76(318):5-47. PubMed ID: 16175972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales.
Copay AG; Glassman SD; Subach BR; Berven S; Schuler TC; Carreon LY
Spine J; 2008; 8(6):968-74. PubMed ID: 18201937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accurately measuring the quality and effectiveness of lumbar surgery in registry efforts: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; Glassman SD; McGirt MJ
Spine J; 2014 Dec; 14(12):2885-91. PubMed ID: 24768731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of a multidimensional measure for recurrent abdominal pain in children: population-based studies in three settings.
Malaty HM; Abudayyeh S; O'Malley KJ; Wilsey MJ; Fraley K; Gilger MA; Hollier D; Graham DY; Rabeneck L
Pediatrics; 2005 Feb; 115(2):e210-5. PubMed ID: 15687428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical guidelines and payer policies on fusion for the treatment of chronic low back pain.
Cheng JS; Lee MJ; Massicotte E; Ashman B; Gruenberg M; Pilcher LE; Skelly AC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Oct; 36(21 Suppl):S144-63. PubMed ID: 21952186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Lumbar disc nomenclature: version 2.0: Recommendations of the combined task forces of the North American Spine Society, the American Society of Spine Radiology and the American Society of Neuroradiology.
Fardon DF; Williams AL; Dohring EJ; Murtagh FR; Gabriel Rothman SL; Sze GK
Spine J; 2014 Nov; 14(11):2525-45. PubMed ID: 24768732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
