268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22387522)
1. Short- and long-term morbidity and outcomes after robotic surgery for comprehensive endometrial cancer staging.
Backes FJ; Brudie LA; Farrell MR; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ; Bigsby GE; O'Malley D; Cohn DE; Holloway RW; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jun; 125(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 22387522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.
DeNardis SA; Holloway RW; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):412-7. PubMed ID: 18834620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A cohort study evaluating robotic versus laparotomy surgical outcomes of obese women with endometrial carcinoma.
Subramaniam A; Kim KH; Bryant SA; Zhang B; Sikes C; Kimball KJ; Kilgore LC; Huh WK; Straughn JM; Alvarez RD
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Sep; 122(3):604-7. PubMed ID: 21658752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging.
Veljovich DS; Paley PJ; Drescher CW; Everett EN; Shah C; Peters WA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 198(6):679.e1-9; discussion 679.e9-10. PubMed ID: 18538151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reducing readmissions after robotic surgical management of endometrial cancer: a potential for improved quality care.
Liang MI; Rosen MA; Rath KS; Clements AE; Backes FJ; Eisenhauer EL; Salani R; O'Malley DM; Fowler JM; Cohn DE
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Dec; 131(3):508-11. PubMed ID: 24096114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies.
Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perioperative outcomes of total laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy versus total robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients: a multicentre study.
Fagotti A; Gagliardi ML; Fanfani F; Salerno MG; Ercoli A; D'Asta M; Tortorella L; Turco LC; Escobar P; Scambia G
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jun; 125(3):552-5. PubMed ID: 22391483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A cost analysis of postoperative management in endometrial cancer patients treated by robotics versus laparoscopic approach.
Martino MA; Shubella J; Thomas MB; Morcrette RM; Schindler J; Williams S; Boulay R
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Dec; 123(3):528-31. PubMed ID: 21968341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between 155 cases of robotic vs. 150 cases of open surgical staging for endometrial cancer.
ElSahwi KS; Hooper C; De Leon MC; Gallo TN; Ratner E; Silasi DA; Santin AD; Schwartz PE; Rutherford TJ; Azodi M
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Feb; 124(2):260-4. PubMed ID: 22036203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.
Seamon LG; Fowler JM; Richardson DL; Carlson MJ; Valmadre S; Phillips GS; Cohn DE
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 19428096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy.
Boggess JF; Gehrig PA; Cantrell L; Shafer A; Ridgway M; Skinner EN; Fowler WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 199(4):360.e1-9. PubMed ID: 18928974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman?
Gehrig PA; Cantrell LA; Shafer A; Abaid LN; Mendivil A; Boggess JF
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Oct; 111(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18694588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: Analysis of surgical performance.
Holloway RW; Ahmad S; DeNardis SA; Peterson LB; Sultana N; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Finkler NJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Dec; 115(3):447-52. PubMed ID: 19765807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report.
Fader AN; Escobar PF
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 19481243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic surgical staging for obese patients with endometrial cancer.
Tang KY; Gardiner SK; Gould C; Osmundsen B; Collins M; Winter WE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 206(6):513.e1-6. PubMed ID: 22409959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combined laparoscopic and vaginal radical surgery in cervical cancer.
Renaud MC; Plante M; Roy M
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Oct; 79(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 11006032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.
Corrado G; Cutillo G; Pomati G; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Vincenzoni C; Baiocco E; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1074-81. PubMed ID: 26002986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
