These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22387522)
1. Short- and long-term morbidity and outcomes after robotic surgery for comprehensive endometrial cancer staging. Backes FJ; Brudie LA; Farrell MR; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ; Bigsby GE; O'Malley D; Cohn DE; Holloway RW; Fowler JM Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jun; 125(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 22387522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. DeNardis SA; Holloway RW; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):412-7. PubMed ID: 18834620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy? Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A cohort study evaluating robotic versus laparotomy surgical outcomes of obese women with endometrial carcinoma. Subramaniam A; Kim KH; Bryant SA; Zhang B; Sikes C; Kimball KJ; Kilgore LC; Huh WK; Straughn JM; Alvarez RD Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Sep; 122(3):604-7. PubMed ID: 21658752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging. Veljovich DS; Paley PJ; Drescher CW; Everett EN; Shah C; Peters WA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 198(6):679.e1-9; discussion 679.e9-10. PubMed ID: 18538151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reducing readmissions after robotic surgical management of endometrial cancer: a potential for improved quality care. Liang MI; Rosen MA; Rath KS; Clements AE; Backes FJ; Eisenhauer EL; Salani R; O'Malley DM; Fowler JM; Cohn DE Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Dec; 131(3):508-11. PubMed ID: 24096114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies. Penner KR; Fleming ND; Barlavi L; Axtell AE; Lentz SE Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):186.e1-8. PubMed ID: 25132462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perioperative outcomes of total laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy versus total robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients: a multicentre study. Fagotti A; Gagliardi ML; Fanfani F; Salerno MG; Ercoli A; D'Asta M; Tortorella L; Turco LC; Escobar P; Scambia G Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jun; 125(3):552-5. PubMed ID: 22391483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A cost analysis of postoperative management in endometrial cancer patients treated by robotics versus laparoscopic approach. Martino MA; Shubella J; Thomas MB; Morcrette RM; Schindler J; Williams S; Boulay R Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Dec; 123(3):528-31. PubMed ID: 21968341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between 155 cases of robotic vs. 150 cases of open surgical staging for endometrial cancer. ElSahwi KS; Hooper C; De Leon MC; Gallo TN; Ratner E; Silasi DA; Santin AD; Schwartz PE; Rutherford TJ; Azodi M Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Feb; 124(2):260-4. PubMed ID: 22036203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Seamon LG; Fowler JM; Richardson DL; Carlson MJ; Valmadre S; Phillips GS; Cohn DE Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 19428096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Boggess JF; Gehrig PA; Cantrell L; Shafer A; Ridgway M; Skinner EN; Fowler WC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 199(4):360.e1-9. PubMed ID: 18928974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman? Gehrig PA; Cantrell LA; Shafer A; Abaid LN; Mendivil A; Boggess JF Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Oct; 111(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18694588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in gynecologic oncology: technique and initial report. Fader AN; Escobar PF Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2):157-61. PubMed ID: 19481243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic surgical staging for obese patients with endometrial cancer. Tang KY; Gardiner SK; Gould C; Osmundsen B; Collins M; Winter WE Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 206(6):513.e1-6. PubMed ID: 22409959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combined laparoscopic and vaginal radical surgery in cervical cancer. Renaud MC; Plante M; Roy M Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Oct; 79(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 11006032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer. Corrado G; Cutillo G; Pomati G; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Vincenzoni C; Baiocco E; Vizza E Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1074-81. PubMed ID: 26002986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]