These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22387708)

  • 1. Validity of hearing impairment calculation methods for prediction of self-reported hearing handicap.
    John AB; Kreisman BM; Pallett S
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(56):13-20. PubMed ID: 22387708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hearing impairment among workers exposed to excessive levels of noise in ginning industries.
    Dube KJ; Ingale LT; Ingale ST
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(54):348-55. PubMed ID: 21959115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
    Saunders GH; Forsline A
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of a questionnaire to identify hearing loss among farm operators.
    McCullagh MC
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(56):32-8. PubMed ID: 22387711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validity of self-rated hearing compared with audiometric measurement among construction workers.
    Hong O; Ronis DL; Antonakos CL
    Nurs Res; 2011; 60(5):326-32. PubMed ID: 21873915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The risk of tinnitus following occupational noise exposure in workers with hearing loss or normal hearing.
    Rubak T; Kock S; Koefoed-Nielsen B; Lund SP; Bonde JP; Kolstad HA
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Mar; 47(3):109-14. PubMed ID: 18307090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Noise exposure and hearing conservation practices in an industry with high incidence of workers' compensation claims for hearing loss.
    Daniell WE; Swan SS; McDaniel MM; Stebbins JG; Seixas NS; Morgan MS
    Am J Ind Med; 2002 Oct; 42(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 12271478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [From the expert's office: Occupational hearing impairment never progresses after noise exposition].
    Brusis T
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2010 Nov; 89(11):666-8. PubMed ID: 21058234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prevalence of hearing loss and accuracy of self-report among factory workers.
    McCullagh MC; Raymond D; Kerr MJ; Lusk SL
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(54):340-7. PubMed ID: 21959114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Deterioration of noise-induced hearing loss among bottling factory workers.
    Ologe FE; Olajide TG; Nwawolo CC; Oyejola BA
    J Laryngol Otol; 2008 Aug; 122(8):786-94. PubMed ID: 17666128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The burdens of age-related and occupational noise-induced hearing loss in the United States.
    Dobie RA
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):565-77. PubMed ID: 18469718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of various methods of evaluating auditory damage caused by chronic acoustic injury].
    Marcer G; Bizzotto R; Bartolucci GB; Saia BO
    G Ital Med Lav; 1985; 7(2-3):75-80. PubMed ID: 3836911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Findings of standard and high-frequency audiometry in workers exposed to occupational noise for long durations].
    Türkkahraman S; Gök U; Karlidağ T; Keleş E; Oztürk A
    Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg; 2003 Apr; 10(4):137-42. PubMed ID: 12941983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pure-tone threshold description of an elderly French screened population.
    Blanchet C; Pommie C; Mondain M; Berr C; Hillaire D; Puel JL
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jun; 29(4):432-40. PubMed ID: 18520580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increased reporting of occupational hearing loss: workers' compensation in Washington State, 1984-1998.
    Daniell WE; Fulton-Kehoe D; Cohen M; Swan SS; Franklin GM
    Am J Ind Med; 2002 Dec; 42(6):502-10. PubMed ID: 12439873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methodological issues when comparing hearing thresholds of a group with population standards: the case of the ferry engineers.
    Dobie RA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):526-37. PubMed ID: 16957502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of low frequency noise on the echocardiographic parameter E/A ratio.
    Chao PC; Yeh CY; Juang YJ; Hu CY; Chen CJ
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(59):155-8. PubMed ID: 22918145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Audiometric evaluation in extended high frequencies of individuals exposed to occupational noise].
    Porto MA; Gahyva DL; Lauris JR; Lopes AC
    Pro Fono; 2004; 16(3):237-50. PubMed ID: 15609579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of hearing conservation programs on incidence of noise-induced hearing loss in Canadian workers.
    Davies H; Marion S; Teschke K
    Am J Ind Med; 2008 Dec; 51(12):923-31. PubMed ID: 18726988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.