These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22387757)

  • 1. Autonomic nervous system correlates to readiness state and negative outcome during visual discrimination tasks.
    Salvia E; Guillot A; Collet C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 May; 84(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 22387757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Information transmission for one-dimensional stimuli: the role of strategies.
    De Sanctis P; Sommer W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 May; 131(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 19268876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Where action impairs visual encoding: an event-related fMRI study.
    Danielmeier C; Zysset S; Müsseler J; von Cramon DY
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 21(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 15325411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. P3a from visual stimuli: task difficulty effects.
    Hagen GF; Gatherwright JR; Lopez BA; Polich J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jan; 59(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 16253363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Real-time tracking of motor response activation and response competition in a Stroop task in young children: a lateralized readiness potential study.
    Szucs D; Soltész F; Bryce D; Whitebread D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 21(11):2195-206. PubMed ID: 19296726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attention and the readiness for action.
    Baker KS; Mattingley JB; Chambers CD; Cunnington R
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Oct; 49(12):3303-13. PubMed ID: 21856320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual discrimination learning in dwarf goats and associated changes in heart rate and heart rate variability.
    Langbein J; Nürnberg G; Manteuffel G
    Physiol Behav; 2004 Sep; 82(4):601-9. PubMed ID: 15327907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The nature of switch cost: task set configuration or carry-over effect?
    Hsieh S; Liu LC
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 22(2):165-75. PubMed ID: 15653291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An ERP investigation of task switching using a flanker paradigm.
    Umebayashi K; Okita T
    Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 1346():165-73. PubMed ID: 20573600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How does error correction differ from error signaling? An event-related potential study.
    Ullsperger M; von Cramon DY
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 16483557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What does ipsilateral delay activity reflect? Inferences from slow potentials in a lateralized visual working memory task.
    Arend AM; Zimmer HD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 23(12):4048-56. PubMed ID: 21671741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The interaction of task-relevant and task-irrelevant stimulus features in the number/size congruency paradigm: an ERP study.
    Szucs D; Soltész F
    Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1190():143-58. PubMed ID: 18076868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feedforward and quick recurrent processes in early visual cortex revealed by TMS?
    de Graaf TA; Goebel R; Sack AT
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jul; 61(3):651-9. PubMed ID: 22032946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociation of the N2pc and sustained posterior contralateral negativity in a choice response task.
    Jolicoeur P; Brisson B; Robitaille N
    Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():160-72. PubMed ID: 18482718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of temporal difficulty on cerebrocerebellar interaction during visual duration discrimination.
    Shih LY; Yeh TC; Kuo WJ; Tzeng OJ; Hsieh JC
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Feb; 207(1):155-60. PubMed ID: 19818807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The valence strength of negative stimuli modulates visual novelty processing: electrophysiological evidence from an event-related potential study.
    Yuan JJ; Yang JM; Meng XX; Yu FQ; Li H
    Neuroscience; 2008 Dec; 157(3):524-31. PubMed ID: 18926886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual basis of redundancy gains in visual pop-out search.
    Töllner T; Zehetleitner M; Krummenacher J; Müller HJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):137-50. PubMed ID: 20044891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Autonomic nervous system responses as performance indicators among volleyball players.
    Collet C; Roure R; Delhomme G; Dittmar A; Rada H; Vernet-Maury E
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1999 Jun; 80(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 10367722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.