160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22388302)
1. In vivo comparison of Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasonography.
Ramesh S; Papayannis A; Abdel-karim AR; Banerjee S; Brilakis E
J Invasive Cardiol; 2012 Mar; 24(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 22388302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optical coherence tomography versus intravascular ultrasound to evaluate coronary artery disease and percutaneous coronary intervention.
Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Sirbu V; Musumeci G; Lortkipanidze N; Fujino Y; Wang W; Nakamura S; Erglis A; Guagliumi G; Costa MA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Mar; 6(3):228-36. PubMed ID: 23517833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. OCT compared with IVUS in a coronary lesion assessment: the OPUS-CLASS study.
Kubo T; Akasaka T; Shite J; Suzuki T; Uemura S; Yu B; Kozuma K; Kitabata H; Shinke T; Habara M; Saito Y; Hou J; Suzuki N; Zhang S
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1095-1104. PubMed ID: 24011777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Discrepancy between frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in human coronary arteries and in a phantom in vitro coronary model.
Kim IC; Nam CW; Cho YK; Park HS; Yoon HJ; Kim H; Chung IS; Han S; Hur SH; Kim YN; Kim KB
Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 221():860-6. PubMed ID: 27434362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vivo comparison of lumen dimensions measured by time domain-, and frequency domain-optical coherence tomography, and intravascular ultrasound.
Kim SJ; Lee H; Kato K; Yonetsu T; Jang IK
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jun; 29(5):967-75. PubMed ID: 23292151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease-a comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
Fujino Y; Bezerra HG; Attizzani GF; Wang W; Yamamoto H; Chamié D; Kanaya T; Mehanna E; Tahara S; Nakamura S; Costa MA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E173-83. PubMed ID: 23359350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of frequency-domain optical coherence tomography guidance for optimal coronary stent implantation in comparison with intravascular ultrasound guidance.
Habara M; Nasu K; Terashima M; Kaneda H; Yokota D; Ko E; Ito T; Kurita T; Tanaka N; Kimura M; Ito T; Kinoshita Y; Tsuchikane E; Asakura K; Asakura Y; Katoh O; Suzuki T
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Apr; 5(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 22456026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography in identifying functionally significant coronary stenosis according to vessel diameter: A meta-analysis of 2,581 patients and 2,807 lesions.
D'Ascenzo F; Barbero U; Cerrato E; Lipinski MJ; Omedè P; Montefusco A; Taha S; Naganuma T; Reith S; Voros S; Latib A; Gonzalo N; Quadri G; Colombo A; Biondi-Zoccai G; Escaned J; Moretti C; Gaita F
Am Heart J; 2015 May; 169(5):663-73. PubMed ID: 25965714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interstudy reproducibility of the second generation, Fourier domain optical coherence tomography in patients with coronary artery disease and comparison with intravascular ultrasound: a study applying automated contour detection.
Jamil Z; Tearney G; Bruining N; Sihan K; van Soest G; Ligthart J; van Domburg R; Bouma B; Regar E
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 29(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 22639296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative precision of optical frequency domain imaging: direct comparison with frequency domain optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound.
Kobayashi Y; Kitahara H; Tanaka S; Okada K; Kimura T; Ikeno F; Yock PG; Fitzgerald PJ; Honda Y
Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2016 Apr; 31(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 26271203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of hemodynamically severe coronary stenosis as determined by fractional flow reserve with frequency domain optical coherence tomography measured anatomical parameters.
Zafar H; Ullah I; Dinneen K; Matiullah S; Hanley A; Leahy MJ; Sharif F
J Cardiol; 2014 Jul; 64(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 24368093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in detecting neointimal healing patterns after stent implantation.
Kochman J; Pietrasik A; Rdzanak A; Jąkała J; Zasada W; Scibisz A; Kołtowski L; Proniewska K; Pociask E; Legutko J
Kardiol Pol; 2014; 72(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 24293141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Safety and feasibility of an intravascular optical coherence tomography image wire system in the clinical setting.
Yamaguchi T; Terashima M; Akasaka T; Hayashi T; Mizuno K; Muramatsu T; Nakamura M; Nakamura S; Saito S; Takano M; Takayama T; Yoshikawa J; Suzuki T
Am J Cardiol; 2008 Mar; 101(5):562-7. PubMed ID: 18307999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anatomically correct three-dimensional coronary artery reconstruction using frequency domain optical coherence tomographic and angiographic data: head-to-head comparison with intravascular ultrasound for endothelial shear stress assessment in humans.
Papafaklis MI; Bourantas CV; Yonetsu T; Vergallo R; Kotsia A; Nakatani S; Lakkas LS; Athanasiou LS; Naka KK; Fotiadis DI; Feldman CL; Stone PH; Serruys PW; Jang IK; Michalis LK
EuroIntervention; 2015 Aug; 11(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 24974809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Morphometric assessment of coronary stenosis relevance with optical coherence tomography: a comparison with fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound.
Gonzalo N; Escaned J; Alfonso F; Nolte C; Rodriguez V; Jimenez-Quevedo P; Bañuelos C; Fernández-Ortiz A; Garcia E; Hernandez-Antolin R; Macaya C
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Mar; 59(12):1080-9. PubMed ID: 22421301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optical coherence tomography-derived anatomical criteria for functionally significant coronary stenosis assessed by fractional flow reserve.
Shiono Y; Kitabata H; Kubo T; Masuno T; Ohta S; Ozaki Y; Sougawa H; Orii M; Shimamura K; Ishibashi K; Komukai K; Yamano T; Tanimoto T; Ino Y; Yamaguchi T; Hirata K; Mizukoshi M; Imanishi T; Akasaka T
Circ J; 2012; 76(9):2218-25. PubMed ID: 22785153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproducibility of coronary optical coherence tomography for lumen and length measurements in humans (The CLI-VAR [Centro per la Lotta contro l'Infarto-VARiability] study).
Fedele S; Biondi-Zoccai G; Kwiatkowski P; Di Vito L; Occhipinti M; Cremonesi A; Albertucci M; Materia L; Paoletti G; Prati F
Am J Cardiol; 2012 Oct; 110(8):1106-12. PubMed ID: 22748353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The ability of optical coherence tomography to monitor percutaneous coronary intervention: detailed comparison with intravascular ultrasound.
Kawamori H; Shite J; Shinke T; Otake H; Sawada T; Kato H; Miyoshi N; Yoshino N; Kozuki A; Hariki H; Inoue T; Hirata K
J Invasive Cardiol; 2010 Nov; 22(11):541-5. PubMed ID: 21041851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography to intravascular ultrasound in the assessment of intermediate left main stenosis.
Porto I; Dato I; Todaro D; Calabrese M; Rigattieri S; Leone AM; Niccoli G; Burzotta F; Trani C; Crea F
Am J Cardiol; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1600-7. PubMed ID: 22424580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variability in quantitative and qualitative analysis of intravascular ultrasound and frequency domain optical coherence tomography.
Abnousi F; Waseda K; Kume T; Otake H; Kawarada O; Yong CM; Fitzgerald PJ; Honda Y; Yeung AC; Fearon WF
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Sep; 82(3):E192-9. PubMed ID: 23412754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
