BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22389519)

  • 1. Dip listening and the cocktail party problem in grey treefrogs: Signal recognition in temporally fluctuating noise.
    Vélez A; Bee MA
    Anim Behav; 2011 Dec; 82(6):1319-1327. PubMed ID: 22389519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Signal recognition by green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) and Cope's gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis) in naturally fluctuating noise.
    Vélez A; Bee MA
    J Comp Psychol; 2013 May; 127(2):166-78. PubMed ID: 23106802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dip listening or modulation masking? Call recognition by green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea) in temporally fluctuating noise.
    Vélez A; Höbel G; Gordon NM; Bee MA
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2012 Dec; 198(12):891-904. PubMed ID: 23069882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Signal recognition by frogs in the presence of temporally fluctuating chorus-shaped noise.
    Vélez A; Bee MA
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol; 2010 Oct; 64(10):1695-1709. PubMed ID: 21170157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finding a mate at a cocktail party: Spatial release from masking improves acoustic mate recognition in grey treefrogs.
    Bee MA
    Anim Behav; 2008 May; 75(5):1781-1791. PubMed ID: 19412318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frogs Exploit Statistical Regularities in Noisy Acoustic Scenes to Solve Cocktail-Party-like Problems.
    Lee N; Ward JL; Vélez A; Micheyl C; Bee MA
    Curr Biol; 2017 Mar; 27(5):743-750. PubMed ID: 28238657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treefrogs as animal models for research on auditory scene analysis and the cocktail party problem.
    Bee MA
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Feb; 95(2):216-37. PubMed ID: 24424243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pulse-number discrimination by Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis) in modulated and unmodulated noise.
    Vélez A; Linehan-Skillings BJ; Gu Y; Sun Y; Bee MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3079-89. PubMed ID: 24116442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial release from masking improves sound pattern discrimination along a biologically relevant pulse-rate continuum in gray treefrogs.
    Ward JL; Buerkle NP; Bee MA
    Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():63-75. PubMed ID: 24055623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Finding your mate at a cocktail party: frequency separation promotes auditory stream segregation of concurrent voices in multi-species frog choruses.
    Nityananda V; Bee MA
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(6):e21191. PubMed ID: 21698268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advertisement-call preferences in diploid-tetraploid treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor): implications for mate choice and the evolution of communication systems.
    Gerhardt HC
    Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 15807424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of Binaural Temporal Fine Structure and Envelope Cues in Cocktail-Party Listening.
    Swaminathan J; Mason CR; Streeter TM; Best V; Roverud E; Kidd G
    J Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 36(31):8250-7. PubMed ID: 27488643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatial release from masking in a free-field source identification task by gray treefrogs.
    Nityananda V; Bee MA
    Hear Res; 2012 Mar; 285(1-2):86-97. PubMed ID: 22240459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An experimental test of noise-dependent voice amplitude regulation in Cope's grey treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis).
    Love EK; Bee MA
    Anim Behav; 2010 Sep; 80(3):509-515. PubMed ID: 20823939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.
    Wendt D; Koelewijn T; Książek P; Kramer SE; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Testing an auditory illusion in frogs: Perceptual restoration or sensory bias?
    Seeba F; Schwartz JJ; Bee MA
    Anim Behav; 2010 Jun; 79(6):1317-1328. PubMed ID: 20514342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sound level discrimination by gray treefrogs in the presence and absence of chorus-shaped noise.
    Bee MA; Vélez A; Forester JD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):4188-95. PubMed ID: 22559390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The fluctuating masker benefit for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners with equal audibility at a fixed signal-to-noise ratio.
    Jensen KK; Bernstein JGW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Apr; 145(4):2113. PubMed ID: 31046298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does common spatial origin promote the auditory grouping of temporally separated signal elements in grey treefrogs?
    Bee MA; Riemersma KK
    Anim Behav; 2008 Sep; 76(3):831-843. PubMed ID: 19727419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sentence Recognition in Steady-State Speech-Shaped Noise versus Four-Talker Babble.
    Vermiglio AJ; Herring CC; Heeke P; Post CE; Fang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 30461388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.