These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22389720)

  • 1. Setting an optimal α that minimizes errors in null hypothesis significance tests.
    Mudge JF; Baker LF; Edge CB; Houlahan JE
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e32734. PubMed ID: 22389720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Negative consequences of using α = 0.05 for environmental monitoring decisions: a case study from a decade of Canada's Environmental Effects Monitoring Program.
    Mudge JF; Barrett TJ; Munkittrick KR; Houlahan JE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(17):9249-55. PubMed ID: 22873710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimizing α for better statistical decisions: a case study involving the pace-of-life syndrome hypothesis: optimal α levels set to minimize Type I and II errors frequently result in different conclusions from those using α = 0.05.
    Mudge JF; Penny FM; Houlahan JE
    Bioessays; 2012 Dec; 34(12):1045-9. PubMed ID: 23080550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical reasoning in clinical trials: hypothesis testing.
    Kelen GD; Brown CG; Ashton J
    Am J Emerg Med; 1988 Jan; 6(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 3275456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hypothesis testing.
    Yarandi HN
    Clin Nurse Spec; 1996 Jul; 10(4):186-8. PubMed ID: 8900794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Explicit consideration of critical effect sizes and costs of errors can improve decision-making in plant science.
    Mudge JF
    New Phytol; 2013 Sep; 199(4):876-878. PubMed ID: 23834752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical Power in Plant Pathology Research.
    Gent DH; Esker PD; Kriss AB
    Phytopathology; 2018 Jan; 108(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 28876210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Beyond statistical inference: a decision theory for science.
    Killeen PR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Aug; 13(4):549-62. PubMed ID: 17201351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Significance, Errors, Power, and Sample Size: The Blocking and Tackling of Statistics.
    Mascha EJ; Vetter TR
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Feb; 126(2):691-698. PubMed ID: 29346210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. P value and the theory of hypothesis testing: an explanation for new researchers.
    Biau DJ; Jolles BM; Porcher R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 468(3):885-92. PubMed ID: 19921345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiplicity, directional (type III) errors, and the null hypothesis.
    Shaffer JP
    Psychol Methods; 2002 Sep; 7(3):356-69. PubMed ID: 12243306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why and how we should join the shift from significance testing to estimation.
    Berner D; Amrhein V
    J Evol Biol; 2022 Jun; 35(6):777-787. PubMed ID: 35582935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Errors in Statistical Inference Under Model Misspecification: Evidence, Hypothesis Testing, and AIC.
    Dennis B; Ponciano JM; Taper ML; Lele SR
    Front Ecol Evol; 2019; 7():. PubMed ID: 34295904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Issues in biomedical statistics: statistical inference.
    Ludbrook J; Dudley H
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1994 Sep; 64(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 8085981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The probabilities of type I and II error of null of cointegration tests: A Monte Carlo comparison.
    Aysan AF; Guney I; Isac N; Khan AUI
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0259994. PubMed ID: 34982763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistics in ophthalmology revisited: the (effect) size matters.
    Grzybowski A; Mianowany M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 96(7):e885-e888. PubMed ID: 30187631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Not significant--what now?].
    Gerss J
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2006 Dec; 128(6):307-10. PubMed ID: 17213967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decision-making when data and inferences are not conclusive: risk-benefit and acceptable regret approach.
    Hozo I; Schell MJ; Djulbegovic B
    Semin Hematol; 2008 Jul; 45(3):150-9. PubMed ID: 18582621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Principles of tests of hypotheses in statistics: alpha, beta and P].
    Riou B; Landais P
    Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 1998; 17(9):1168-80. PubMed ID: 9835991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy when inferential statistics are used as measurement tools.
    Bradley MT; Brand A
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Apr; 9():241. PubMed ID: 27112752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.