These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

575 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22390284)

  • 1. Serrated polyp detection rate during screening colonoscopy.
    Liang J; Kalady MF; Appau K; Church J
    Colorectal Dis; 2012 Nov; 14(11):1323-7. PubMed ID: 22390284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy.
    Kahi CJ; Hewett DG; Norton DL; Eckert GJ; Rex DK
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Jan; 9(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 20888435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.
    Yen AW; Leung JW; Leung FW
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):944-8. PubMed ID: 23473001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adenoma and sessile serrated polyp detection rates: variation by patient sex and colonic segment but not specialty of the endoscopist.
    Sanaka MR; Gohel T; Podugu A; Kiran RP; Thota PN; Lopez R; Church JM; Burke CA
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Sep; 57(9):1113-9. PubMed ID: 25101608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High colonoscopic prevalence of proximal colon serrated polyps in average-risk men and women.
    Kahi CJ; Li X; Eckert GJ; Rex DK
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Mar; 75(3):515-20. PubMed ID: 22018551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection rate and proximal shift tendency of adenomas and serrated polyps: a retrospective study of 62,560 colonoscopies.
    Chen S; Sun K; Chao K; Sun Y; Hong L; Weng Z; Cui Y; Chen M; Zhang S
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Feb; 33(2):131-139. PubMed ID: 29282495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simple proxies for detection of clinically significant serrated polyps and data for their benchmarks.
    Park SK; Park SH; Yang HJ; Jung YS; Park JH; Sohn CI; Park DI
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Aug; 35(8):1365-1371. PubMed ID: 31907971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The proximal serrated polyp detection rate is an easy-to-measure proxy for the detection rate of clinically relevant serrated polyps.
    IJspeert JE; van Doorn SC; van der Brug YM; Bastiaansen BA; Fockens P; Dekker E
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):870-7. PubMed ID: 25935704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enhanced flat adenoma detection rate with high definition colonoscopy plus i-scan for average-risk colorectal cancer screening.
    Rodríguez-D Jesus A; Saperas E
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2016 May; 108(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 27023867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
    Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection rates of proximal or large serrated polyps in Chinese patients undergoing screening colonoscopy.
    Leung WK; Tang V; Lui PC
    J Dig Dis; 2012 Sep; 13(9):466-71. PubMed ID: 22908972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Serrated and adenomatous polyp detection increases with longer withdrawal time: results from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
    Butterly L; Robinson CM; Anderson JC; Weiss JE; Goodrich M; Onega TL; Amos CI; Beach ML
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 109(3):417-26. PubMed ID: 24394752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time.
    Simmons DT; Harewood GC; Baron TH; Petersen BT; Wang KK; Boyd-Enders F; Ott BJ
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Sep; 24(6):965-71. PubMed ID: 16948808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proximal and large hyperplastic and nondysplastic serrated polyps detected by colonoscopy are associated with neoplasia.
    Schreiner MA; Weiss DG; Lieberman DA
    Gastroenterology; 2010 Nov; 139(5):1497-502. PubMed ID: 20633561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Does endoscopist fatigue play a role in incomplete colonoscopies and detection of polypoid lesions?].
    Borda F; Borda A; Jiménez FJ; Fernández-Urién I; Vila JJ; Zozaya JM
    Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Jan; 37(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 24342118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recommended intervals between screening and surveillance colonoscopies.
    Baron TH; Smyrk TC; Rex DK
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2013 Aug; 88(8):854-8. PubMed ID: 23910411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endoscopic detection of proximal serrated lesions and pathologic identification of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps vary on the basis of center.
    Payne SR; Church TR; Wandell M; Rösch T; Osborn N; Snover D; Day RW; Ransohoff DF; Rex DK
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Jul; 12(7):1119-26. PubMed ID: 24333512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.
    Madhoun MF; Tierney WM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 21963062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy.
    Millan MS; Gross P; Manilich E; Church JM
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Aug; 51(8):1217-20. PubMed ID: 18500502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Editorial: Detection targets for colonoscopy: from variable detection to validation.
    Rex DK; Hewett DG; Snover DC
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Dec; 105(12):2665-9. PubMed ID: 21131934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.