578 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22390284)
1. Serrated polyp detection rate during screening colonoscopy.
Liang J; Kalady MF; Appau K; Church J
Colorectal Dis; 2012 Nov; 14(11):1323-7. PubMed ID: 22390284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy.
Kahi CJ; Hewett DG; Norton DL; Eckert GJ; Rex DK
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2011 Jan; 9(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 20888435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel method with significant impact on adenoma detection: combined water-exchange and cap-assisted colonoscopy.
Yen AW; Leung JW; Leung FW
Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):944-8. PubMed ID: 23473001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adenoma and sessile serrated polyp detection rates: variation by patient sex and colonic segment but not specialty of the endoscopist.
Sanaka MR; Gohel T; Podugu A; Kiran RP; Thota PN; Lopez R; Church JM; Burke CA
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Sep; 57(9):1113-9. PubMed ID: 25101608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High colonoscopic prevalence of proximal colon serrated polyps in average-risk men and women.
Kahi CJ; Li X; Eckert GJ; Rex DK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Mar; 75(3):515-20. PubMed ID: 22018551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection rate and proximal shift tendency of adenomas and serrated polyps: a retrospective study of 62,560 colonoscopies.
Chen S; Sun K; Chao K; Sun Y; Hong L; Weng Z; Cui Y; Chen M; Zhang S
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Feb; 33(2):131-139. PubMed ID: 29282495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Simple proxies for detection of clinically significant serrated polyps and data for their benchmarks.
Park SK; Park SH; Yang HJ; Jung YS; Park JH; Sohn CI; Park DI
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Aug; 35(8):1365-1371. PubMed ID: 31907971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The proximal serrated polyp detection rate is an easy-to-measure proxy for the detection rate of clinically relevant serrated polyps.
IJspeert JE; van Doorn SC; van der Brug YM; Bastiaansen BA; Fockens P; Dekker E
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):870-7. PubMed ID: 25935704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enhanced flat adenoma detection rate with high definition colonoscopy plus i-scan for average-risk colorectal cancer screening.
Rodríguez-D Jesus A; Saperas E
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2016 May; 108(5):257-62. PubMed ID: 27023867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Providing data for serrated polyp detection rate benchmarks: an analysis of the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Weiss JE; Robinson CM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 28153571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection rates of proximal or large serrated polyps in Chinese patients undergoing screening colonoscopy.
Leung WK; Tang V; Lui PC
J Dig Dis; 2012 Sep; 13(9):466-71. PubMed ID: 22908972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Serrated and adenomatous polyp detection increases with longer withdrawal time: results from the New Hampshire Colonoscopy Registry.
Butterly L; Robinson CM; Anderson JC; Weiss JE; Goodrich M; Onega TL; Amos CI; Beach ML
Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 109(3):417-26. PubMed ID: 24394752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time.
Simmons DT; Harewood GC; Baron TH; Petersen BT; Wang KK; Boyd-Enders F; Ott BJ
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Sep; 24(6):965-71. PubMed ID: 16948808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Proximal and large hyperplastic and nondysplastic serrated polyps detected by colonoscopy are associated with neoplasia.
Schreiner MA; Weiss DG; Lieberman DA
Gastroenterology; 2010 Nov; 139(5):1497-502. PubMed ID: 20633561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Does endoscopist fatigue play a role in incomplete colonoscopies and detection of polypoid lesions?].
Borda F; Borda A; Jiménez FJ; Fernández-Urién I; Vila JJ; Zozaya JM
Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Jan; 37(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 24342118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recommended intervals between screening and surveillance colonoscopies.
Baron TH; Smyrk TC; Rex DK
Mayo Clin Proc; 2013 Aug; 88(8):854-8. PubMed ID: 23910411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endoscopic detection of proximal serrated lesions and pathologic identification of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps vary on the basis of center.
Payne SR; Church TR; Wandell M; Rösch T; Osborn N; Snover D; Day RW; Ransohoff DF; Rex DK
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Jul; 12(7):1119-26. PubMed ID: 24333512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates.
Madhoun MF; Tierney WM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Jan; 75(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 21963062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy.
Millan MS; Gross P; Manilich E; Church JM
Dis Colon Rectum; 2008 Aug; 51(8):1217-20. PubMed ID: 18500502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Editorial: Detection targets for colonoscopy: from variable detection to validation.
Rex DK; Hewett DG; Snover DC
Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Dec; 105(12):2665-9. PubMed ID: 21131934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
