These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22390323)

  • 1. Three tests and three corrections: comment on Koen and Yonelinas (2010).
    Jang Y; Mickes L; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):513-23. PubMed ID: 22390323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mixing strong and weak targets provides no evidence against the unequal-variance explanation of ʐROC slope: a comment on Koen and Yonelinas (2010).
    Starns JJ; Rotello CM; Ratcliff R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):793-801. PubMed ID: 22545617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The unequal variance signal-detection model of recognition memory: Investigating the encoding variability hypothesis.
    Spanton RW; Berry CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Aug; 73(8):1242-1260. PubMed ID: 31986982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does variability in recognition memory scale with mean memory strength or encoding variability in the UVSD model?
    Spanton RW; Berry CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Sep; 76(9):2037-2052. PubMed ID: 36274514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Probability of target recollection varies with target-lure relatedness under the dual process signal detection model.
    Dopkins S; Galyer D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Oct; 201():102933. PubMed ID: 31739089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the unequal-variance and dual-process explanations of zROC slopes with response time data and the diffusion model.
    Starns JJ; Ratcliff R; McKoon G
    Cogn Psychol; 2012 Feb; 64(1-2):1-34. PubMed ID: 22079870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Memory variability is due to the contribution of recollection and familiarity, not to encoding variability.
    Koen JD; Yonelinas AP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1536-42. PubMed ID: 20854009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Still no evidence for the encoding variability hypothesis: a reply to Jang, Mickes, and Wixted (2012) and Starns, Rotello, and Ratcliff (2012).
    Koen JD; Yonelinas AP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):304-12. PubMed ID: 23339375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examining the causes of memory strength variability: recollection, attention failure, or encoding variability?
    Koen JD; Aly M; Wang WC; Yonelinas AP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1726-41. PubMed ID: 23834057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The unitary zROC slope in amnesics does not reflect the absence of recollection: critical simulations in healthy participants of the zROC slope.
    Didi-Barnea C; Peremen Z; Goshen-Gottstein Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Sep; 90():94-109. PubMed ID: 27235569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A differentiation account of recognition memory: evidence from fMRI.
    Criss AH; Wheeler ME; McClelland JL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Mar; 25(3):421-35. PubMed ID: 23092213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unequal-strength source zROC slopes reflect criteria placement and not (necessarily) memory processes.
    Starns JJ; Pazzaglia AM; Rotello CM; Hautus MJ; Macmillan NA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1377-92. PubMed ID: 23565789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recognition receiver operating characteristic asymmetry: Increased noise or information?
    Dobbins IG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Feb; 49(2):216-229. PubMed ID: 36996188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dissociative effects of orthographic distinctiveness in pure and mixed lists: an item-order account.
    McDaniel MA; Cahill M; Bugg JM; Meadow NG
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Oct; 39(7):1162-73. PubMed ID: 21584853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing a Strategy-Disruption Account of the List-Strength Effect.
    Ensor TM; Bancroft TD; Guitard D; Bireta TJ; Hockley WE; Surprenant AM
    Exp Psychol; 2020 Jul; 67(4):255-275. PubMed ID: 33111659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The strength-based mirror effect in subjective strength ratings: the evidence for differentiation can be produced without differentiation.
    Starns JJ; White CN; Ratcliff R
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Nov; 40(8):1189-99. PubMed ID: 22736423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recognition memory zROC slopes for items with correct versus incorrect source decisions discriminate the dual process and unequal variance signal detection models.
    Starns JJ; Rotello CM; Hautus MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Sep; 40(5):1205-25. PubMed ID: 24820667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validating the unequal-variance assumption in recognition memory using response time distributions instead of ROC functions: A diffusion model analysis.
    Starns JJ; Ratcliff R
    J Mem Lang; 2014 Jan; 70():36-52. PubMed ID: 24459327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Source-constrained retrieval influences the encoding of new information.
    Danckert SL; MacLeod CM; Fernandes MA
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Nov; 39(8):1374-86. PubMed ID: 21647810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using response time modeling to distinguish memory and decision processes in recognition and source tasks.
    Starns JJ
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Nov; 42(8):1357-72. PubMed ID: 25102773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.