These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

335 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22390477)

  • 21. Word Senses as Clusters of Meaning Modulations: A Computational Model of Polysemy.
    Li J; Joanisse MF
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Apr; 45(4):e12955. PubMed ID: 33873247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: the role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading.
    Davis CJ; Perea M; Acha J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1550-70. PubMed ID: 19803656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Emotion, Etmnooi, or Emitoon?--Faster lexical access to emotional than to neutral words during reading.
    Kissler J; Herbert C
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Mar; 92(3):464-79. PubMed ID: 23059636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effects of homonymy and polysemy on lexical access: an MEG study.
    Beretta A; Fiorentino R; Poeppel D
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 15922158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Memory for emotional words: The role of semantic relatedness, encoding task and affective valence.
    Ferré P; Fraga I; Comesaña M; Sánchez-Casas R
    Cogn Emot; 2015; 29(8):1401-10. PubMed ID: 25435268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Get rich quick: the signal to respond procedure reveals the time course of semantic richness effects during visual word recognition.
    Hargreaves IS; Pexman PM
    Cognition; 2014 May; 131(2):216-42. PubMed ID: 24556702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [The effect of taboo word on language processing].
    Huszár T; Makra E; Hallgató E; Janacsek K; Németh D
    Psychiatr Hung; 2010; 25(6):525-37. PubMed ID: 21300999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Orthographic neighborhood effects in reading Chinese two-character words.
    Huang HW; Lee CY; Tsai JL; Lee CL; Hung DL; Tzeng OJ
    Neuroreport; 2006 Jul; 17(10):1061-5. PubMed ID: 16791104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Semantic category effect and emotional valence in female university students.
    Brousseau G; Buchanan L
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):241-8. PubMed ID: 15172542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Does emotional valence affect performance in non-emotional categorization tasks?
    Rinck M; Becker ES
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2009 Sep; 40(3):385-98. PubMed ID: 19362704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Emotional valence and arousal affect reading in an interactive way: neuroimaging evidence for an approach-withdrawal framework.
    Citron FM; Gray MA; Critchley HD; Weekes BS; Ferstl EC
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Apr; 56(100):79-89. PubMed ID: 24440410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Polysemy Advantage with Abstract But Not Concrete Words.
    Jager B; Cleland AA
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Feb; 45(1):143-56. PubMed ID: 25373555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Task effects on eye movements during reading.
    Kaakinen JK; Hyönä J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 20854008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Understanding words in context: the role of Broca's area in word comprehension.
    Bedny M; Hulbert JC; Thompson-Schill SL
    Brain Res; 2007 May; 1146():101-14. PubMed ID: 17123486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Emotional and semantic networks in visual word processing: insights from ERP studies.
    Kissler J; Assadollahi R; Herbert C
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 156():147-83. PubMed ID: 17015079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The complex interactions of context availability, polysemy, word frequency, and orthographic variables during lexical processing.
    Rice CA; Tokowicz N; Fraundorf SH; Liburd TL
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Oct; 47(7):1297-1313. PubMed ID: 31001796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The representation of polysemy: MEG evidence.
    Pylkkänen L; Llinás R; Murphy GL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Jan; 18(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 16417686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Can the emotional connotation of concepts modulate the lexico-semantic deficits in Alzheimer's disease?
    Giffard B; Laisney M; Eustache F; Desgranges B
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):258-67. PubMed ID: 18692515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Interplay of emotional valence and concreteness in word processing: an event-related potential study with verbs.
    Palazova M; Sommer W; Schacht A
    Brain Lang; 2013 Jun; 125(3):264-71. PubMed ID: 23578815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Automatic semantic association between emotional valence and brightness in the right hemisphere.
    Okubo M; Ishikawa K
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Nov; 25(7):1273-80. PubMed ID: 21432631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.