392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22390549)
1. Accuracy of linear measurements and visibility of the mandibular canal of cone-beam computed tomography images with different voxel sizes: an in vitro study.
Waltrick KB; Nunes de Abreu Junior MJ; Corrêa M; Zastrow MD; Dutra VD
J Periodontol; 2013 Jan; 84(1):68-77. PubMed ID: 22390549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors affecting the accuracy of buccal alveolar bone height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images.
Wood R; Sun Z; Chaudhry J; Tee BC; Kim DG; Leblebicioglu B; England G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Mar; 143(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 23452969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull.
Berco M; Rigali PH; Miner RM; DeLuca S; Anderson NK; Will LA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):17.e1-9; discussion 17-8. PubMed ID: 19577142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of linear measurements in cone beam computed tomography with different voxel sizes.
Torres MG; Campos PS; Segundo NP; Navarro M; Crusoé-Rebello I
Implant Dent; 2012 Apr; 21(2):150-5. PubMed ID: 22382754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic images.
Moreira CR; Sales MA; Lopes PM; Cavalcanti MG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 19386521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional accuracy of measurements made with software on cone-beam computed tomography images.
Lagravère MO; Carey J; Toogood RW; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):112-6. PubMed ID: 18617110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Availability of Software-Based Correction of Mandibular Plane for the Vertical Measurement of the Mandible in Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Han SS; Lee KM; Kim KD
Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():808625. PubMed ID: 26579540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements.
Baumgaertel S; Palomo JM; Palomo L; Hans MG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):19-25; discussion 25-8. PubMed ID: 19577143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and direct measurement in the examination of the mandibular canal and adjacent structures.
Kim TS; Caruso JM; Christensen H; Torabinejad M
J Endod; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1191-4. PubMed ID: 20630297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of in vitro mandibular volumetric measurements from CBCT of different voxel sizes with different segmentation threshold settings.
Dong T; Xia L; Cai C; Yuan L; Ye N; Fang B
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Sep; 19(1):206. PubMed ID: 31484529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An In Vivo and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Investigation of the Accuracy in Measuring Alveolar Bone Height and Detecting Dehiscence and Fenestration Defects.
Peterson AG; Wang M; Gonzalez S; Covell DA; Katancik J; Sehgal HS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(6):1296-1304. PubMed ID: 30427960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements obtained from cone beam computed tomography surface-rendered images for cephalometric analysis: influence of patient scanning position.
Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Sanderink G
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 19106265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of voxel size on the accuracy of 3D reconstructions with cone beam CT.
Maret D; Telmon N; Peters OA; Lepage B; Treil J; Inglèse JM; Peyre A; Kahn JL; Sixou M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Dec; 41(8):649-55. PubMed ID: 23166362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy and reliability of buccal bone height and thickness measurements from cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
Timock AM; Cook V; McDonald T; Leo MC; Crowe J; Benninger BL; Covell DA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):734-44. PubMed ID: 22051495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cone beam computed tomography radiation dose and image quality assessments.
Lofthag-Hansen S
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2010; (209):4-55. PubMed ID: 21229915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of reliability and reproducibility of linear measurements of cone-beam-computed tomography.
Santos Tde S; Gomes AC; de Melo DG; Melo AR; Cavalcante JR; de Araújo LC; Travassos RM; Martins-Filho PR; Piva MR; Silva HF
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):473-8. PubMed ID: 23257480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CBCT for the assessment of second mesiobuccal (MB2) canals in maxillary molar teeth: effect of voxel size and presence of root filling.
Vizzotto MB; Silveira PF; Arús NA; Montagner F; Gomes BP; da Silveira HE
Int Endod J; 2013 Sep; 46(9):870-6. PubMed ID: 23442087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone dimensions in the posterior mandible: a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Part 1--analysis of dentate sites.
Braut V; Bornstein MM; Lauber R; Buser D
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Apr; 32(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 22292147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cone beam computed tomography and SimPlant materialize dental software versus direct measurement of the width and height of the posterior mandible: an anatomic study.
Maloney K; Bastidas J; Freeman K; Olson TR; Kraut RA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):1923-9. PubMed ID: 21496995
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT images of different voxel resolutions used to detect simulated small internal resorption cavities.
Kamburoğlu K; Kursun S
Int Endod J; 2010 Sep; 43(9):798-807. PubMed ID: 20609023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
