These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22390549)

  • 61. A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) Part I. On subjective image quality.
    Liang X; Jacobs R; Hassan B; Li L; Pauwels R; Corpas L; Souza PC; Martens W; Shahbazian M; Alonso A; Lambrichts I
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Aug; 75(2):265-9. PubMed ID: 19410409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Measurements of mandibular canal region obtained by cone-beam computed tomography: a cadaveric study.
    Kamburoğlu K; Kiliç C; Ozen T; Yüksel SP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Feb; 107(2):e34-42. PubMed ID: 19138636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Radiographic study of the mandibular retromolar canal: an anatomic structure with clinical importance.
    von Arx T; Hänni A; Sendi P; Buser D; Bornstein MM
    J Endod; 2011 Dec; 37(12):1630-5. PubMed ID: 22099895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Comparison of pharyngeal airway changes on plain radiography and cone-beam computed tomography after orthognathic surgery.
    Sears CR; Miller AJ; Chang MK; Huang JC; Lee JS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 69(11):e385-94. PubMed ID: 21778015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Effect of Resolution and Bit Depth on Inferior Alveolar Canal Visualization on Exported Mandibular Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images.
    Pour DG; Sedaghati A; Shamshiri AR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 May; 78(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 32006490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Accuracy of linear measurements using cone beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in dental implant treatment planning.
    Luangchana P; Pornprasertsuk-Damrongsri S; Kiattavorncharoen S; Jirajariyavej B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(6):1287-94. PubMed ID: 26574854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Comparative evaluation of mandibular canal visibility on cross-sectional cone-beam CT images: a retrospective study.
    Miles MS; Parks ET; Eckert GJ; Blanchard SB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(2):20150296. PubMed ID: 26545046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of simulated small osseous defects in the mandibular condyle.
    Patel A; Tee BC; Fields H; Jones E; Chaudhry J; Sun Z
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 24485728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Precision, reproducibility, and accuracy of bone crest level measurements of CBCT cross sections using different resolutions.
    Menezes CC; Janson G; da Silveira Massaro C; Cambiaghi L; Garib DG
    Angle Orthod; 2016 Jul; 86(4):535-42. PubMed ID: 26488463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Maal T; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 20044238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of dentoskeletal changes after asymmetric rapid maxillary expansion.
    Baka ZM; Akin M; Ucar FI; Ileri Z
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 25533073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Measurement of anterior loop length for the mandibular canal and diameter of the mandibular incisive canal to avoid nerve damage when installing endosseous implants in the interforaminal region: a second attempt introducing cone beam computed tomography.
    Uchida Y; Noguchi N; Goto M; Yamashita Y; Hanihara T; Takamori H; Sato I; Kawai T; Yosue T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):744-50. PubMed ID: 19304029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography images.
    Ludlow JB; Laster WS; See M; Bailey LJ; Hershey HG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Apr; 103(4):534-42. PubMed ID: 17395068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Measurement accuracy of reconstructed 2-D images obtained by multi-slice helical computed tomography.
    Naitoh M; Katsumata A; Nohara E; Ohsaki C; Ariji E
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Oct; 15(5):570-4. PubMed ID: 15355399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Influence of the milliamperage settings on cone beam computed tomography imaging for implant planning.
    Vasconcelos TV; Neves FS; Queiroz de Freitas D; Campos PS; Watanabe PC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(6):1364-8. PubMed ID: 25265127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Effect of voxel size in cone-beam computed tomography on surface area measurements of dehiscences and fenestrations in the lower anterior buccal region.
    van Leeuwen BJ; Dijkstra PU; Dieters JA; Verbeek HPJ; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Ren Y
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Sep; 26(9):5663-5672. PubMed ID: 35513582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. An evaluation of condylar and ramal vertical asymmetry in adolescents with unilateral and bilateral posterior crossbite using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
    Halicioglu K; Celikoglu M; Yavuz I; Sekerci AE; Buyuk SK
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 24968641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Detection of alveolar bone defects with three different voxel sizes of cone-beam computed tomography: an in vitro study.
    Dong T; Yuan L; Liu L; Qian Y; Xia L; Ye N; Fang B
    Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):8146. PubMed ID: 31148581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Vertical bone measurements from cone beam computed tomography images using different software packages.
    Vasconcelos TV; Neves FS; Moraes LA; Freitas DQ
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.